Actions Speak Louder Than (Even Ugly) Words


By Rafael Medoff

Published June 24, 2009, issue of July 03, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Newly released tapes of President Richard Nixon’s private conversations in 1973 include a remark that antisemitism will increase in the United States if American Jews “don’t start behaving.” As outrageous as that comment was, it should be kept in mind that Nixon was not the first American president to privately express antisemitic sentiments — nor is it clear how such views affected those presidents’ policies regarding Jewish concerns.

Friend or Foe? President Richard Nixon meets with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir in Washington in November 1973.
Getty Images
Friend or Foe? President Richard Nixon meets with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir in Washington in November 1973.

Nixon made the statement in a February 21, 1973 telephone call with the evangelist Billy Graham, in which Graham claimed Jewish opposition to Christian missionizing was causing antisemitism.

“Antisemitism is stronger than we think,” Nixon commented. “You know, it’s unfortunate. But this has happened to the Jews. It happened in Spain, it happened in Germany, it’s happening — and now it’s going to happen in America if these people don’t start behaving… it may be they have a death wish. You know that’s been the problem with our Jewish friends for centuries.”

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt embraced a bizarre blame-the-Jews theory of his own. At the Casablanca Conference in 1943, Roosevelt told Free French leaders that the number of Jews entering some professions in liberated North Africa “should definitely be limited,” lest there be a recurrence of “the understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.”

Nor was that FDR’s only unkind remark about Jews. A recently discovered account of a 1939 conversation between Roosevelt and then-senator Burton Wheeler quoted FDR as saying, “You and I, Burt, are old English and Dutch stock. We know who our ancestors are. We know there is no Jewish blood in our veins….” And a recent book about the owners of The New York Times, by scholars Susan Tifft and Alex Jones, quoted FDR complaining about a “dirty Jewish trick,” which he claimed the Times’ owners had used to keep their newspaper within the family.

Roosevelt’s successor also evidently harbored less than pleasant sentiments about Jews. A diary by then-president Harry Truman, discovered in 2003, included this passage from 1947: “The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[erson]s as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog.”

The diary entry was consistent with earlier evidence that Truman had privately described New York City as a “kike town,” referred to his Jewish friend and business partner, Eddie Jacobson, as his “Jew clerk,” and wrote to his wife Bess about someone in a poker game who had “screamed like a Jewish merchant.”

Across the Atlantic, another democratic leader seems to have concurred with the blame-the-Jews theory. An unpublished article by Winston Churchill, written in 1937 and discovered in the Churchill archives by Cambridge University historian Richard Toye in 2007, claimed that Jews were “partly responsible” for the mistreatment that they suffered. Churchill denounced the “cruel and relentless” persecution of the Jews but then criticized German Jewish refugees in England for their willingness to work for less pay than non-Jewish laborers, which — he claimed — caused antisemitism.

Some of Churchill’s earlier statements about Jews and communism indulged in antisemitic stereotypes, such as referring to the Russian Bolshevik leadership as “Semitic conspirators” and “Jew Commissars.”

Yet, paradoxically, Churchill seems to have sympathized with Russian Jewish pogrom victims and strongly endorsed Zionism. Did the private statements by Churchill, Roosevelt, Truman or Nixon affect their public positions on Jewish issues?

Roosevelt expressed sympathy for the Jews being massacred by the Nazis but refrained from taking meaningful steps to help them. He expressed support for the idea of creating a Jewish national home in British Mandatory Palestine, but he took few concrete actions to advance that goal.

Churchill supported the Zionist cause throughout his career, often vigorously so and in the face of fierce opposition within his own Cabinet. Yet when it mattered most, his support was more in the realm of rhetoric than action. As prime minister during the Holocaust years, Churchill left in place the harsh White Paper policy that kept all but a handful of Jews from entering Palestine, thus trapping them in Hitler’s inferno.

Truman, for his part, urged the British to admit Holocaust survivors to Palestine, but he never seriously pressured London to do so (for example, he opposed any linkage between England’s Palestine policies and its request for a huge postwar American loan). Truman is fondly remembered for granting diplomatic recognition to the State of Israel minutes after the state was created, yet he refused to send Israel weapons to defend itself against the invading Arab armies.

Nixon is remembered for authorizing the crucial airlift of arms to Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Yet his administration was also responsible for pressuring Israel to refrain from launching a pre-emptive strike when it was clear that an Arab invasion was imminent, thus causing Israel’s setbacks during the first week of the war — and necessitating the subsequent airlift.

A president’s policies are dictated, first and foremost, by practical considerations of perceived national interest and political risk. A president might personally dislike Jews and yet implement policies favorable to Jewish concerns if it suits his interests to do so; the reverse is also true. Thus in the end, it may not matter what Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill or Nixon privately felt about Jews. Their policies spoke for themselves.

Rafael Medoff is director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • You wouldn't think that a Soviet-Jewish immigrant would find much in common with Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But the famed novelist once helped one man find his first love.
  • Can you relate?
  • The Forverts' "Bintel Brief" advice column ran for more than 65 years. Now it's getting a second life — as a cartoon.
  • Half of this Hillel's members believe Jesus was the Messiah.
  • Vinyl isn't just for hipsters and hippies. Israeli photographer Eilan Paz documents the most astonishing record collections from around the world:
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.