The Power of One Voice

The Hour

By Leonard Fein

Published June 13, 2007, issue of June 15, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The bad news drives out the good. Or, as I prefer, Elef’s Law: Every ounce of promising idea one can articulate will beget at least a pound of dismissive refutation.

Here comes a promising idea. It will immediately be thought implausible, but not because it lacks merit. It will be thought implausible because we have witnessed so many fruitless ideas and that we find it hard to accept that any idea can be fruitful.

The idea? Most broadly, that since there are many more moderates than there are extremists — we’re talking here about Israelis and Palestinians — if only we could mobilize the moderates, they could reverse the deteriorating course of history, write “finis” to the conflict.

Now, so many conversations about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict begin with a wishful, even fantastical, “if only” that one’s guard is immediately alerted. Oh oh, here comes Rodney King again: “Can’t we all just get along?”

But a Mexican Jew named Daniel Lubetzky who graduated from Stanford Law School in 1993 was not deterred by the fear of being thought sappy. Instead, he founded an organization called “One Voice,” and maybe — just maybe — it’s the most practical idea around.

Suppose, Lubetzky thought, we can get a lot of people — say, for example, 1 million — on both sides, Palestinians and Israelis, to sign a joint statement of principle. And suppose we were then to put before all who’ve signed a set of policy propositions and ask them to vote on each. And suppose a broad consensus could be generated regarding the propositions.

Might that not shift the current imbalance of power between extremism and moderation? Might not sufficient momentum thereby be generated to impel politicians to heed the express will of their people?

It turns out that so far, 380,000 people — 200,000 Palestinians and 180,000 Israelis — have signed on to the framing pledge. More than that: Last month, smack in the middle of the ongoing mayhem in Gaza, 14,000 Gazans added their names to the list.

The pledge? In its most basic version, an affirmation of the rights of both peoples to independence, national security, personal safety, sovereignty, freedom, dignity, respect, and economic viability and a call on the political leadership “to immediately commence negotiations and implement a two-state solution” to the conflict.

And the vote? There are 10 propositions; the first and arguably the most important, endorsed by 76% of both Palestinians and Israelis, says “Israel will be the state of the Jewish people and Palestine the state of the Palestinian people, each recognizing the other as such, both democratic and respecting human rights, including minority rights.” Together, the propositions follow, roughly, “the Clinton parameters.”

Lubetzky and his colleagues appear to have touched most if not all bases. They have successfully reached across partisan and ideological constituencies.

Their 37 member Honorary Board of Advisors includes such disparate people as Avishai Braverman, former president of Ben Gurion University of the Negev; Muhammad Ali; Stuart Eisenstat; Dennis Ross; Thomas Pickering; Jim Zogby, executive director of the Arab American Institute; Sheik Taysir al Tamimi, chief Palestinian Islamic justice; and Jonathan Sacks, chief rabbi of the United Kingdom.

Its trustees advisory council, drawn principally from business leaders, includes the founders of Craig’s List and Travelocity. It has an entertainment council that is growing too rapidly to keep accurate track, but that includes Jason Alexander, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman and Danny DeVito.

Most of all, however, it engages in extensive grass-roots organizing, training youth leaders in both societies to recruit others, to organize town meetings, to help grow One Voice into a genuine mass movement. It is One Voice’s success at mobilizing and training some thousands of young people that earned it an appearance at this year’s World Economic Forum at Davos, where Shimon Peres, Mahmoud Abbas and Tzipi Livni shared the stage with videocasts of One Voice town hall meetings in Jerusalem, Ramallah and Tel Aviv.

The mantra of the videocasts, put forward by young Arabs and Jews pledged to live in mutual regard: “What are you willing to do to end the conflict?”

For now, all this is not yet a new wind. But it is more than a wisp, and One Voice is planning what it hopes will be a huge demonstration in early September, an endorsement of its grass-roots approach to conflict resolution, a demonstration that will take place simultaneously in Ramallah, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Jericho and Gaza City.

What lessons can we derive from what has so far happened?

First, there really are few limits, others than those we impose on ourselves, to what one person can achieve. In this instance, one person can initiate and build a mass movement — if others are prepared to listen, to take him seriously and hopefully.

Second, and more startling: There is someone to talk to. There is a partner.

There is no reason not to believe that for every 1,000 people who have so far signed the framing pledge there are 5,000 more who would — and will — gladly add their signatures. There is no reason not to believe that for every 1,000 youth leaders who have been trained to lend an active hand at mobilizing a voice for peace, there are 10,000 more who have the will and can muster the courage to add their hand to the effort.

Those signatures, those hands, are not sufficient to make peace. But they are sufficient to say to the leaders of both sides, “What are you willing to do to end the conflict? Do it, and we will be with you. That is what we can do. That is what we are doing.”

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.