Liberal Jewish activists profess a great regard for the prophetic tradition and its message to the modern world. In these weeks leading up to our traditional day of mourning, Tisha B’Av, our weekly haftarot are peppered with messages of disapproval for a society deaf to God’s word. And it is hard to read those messages — delivered by Jeremiah, Isaiah and Ezekiel — and not feel a chill of recognition.
But should we therefore approach all matters of public policy — health care, taxes, crime and punishment, the environment and so on — by asking WWJD (What Would Jeremiah Do)? From reading through the reams of policy statements and speeches issued by the Jewish community’s most reliably liberal organizations, it’s clear that the thundering words of the prophets count for a lot.
When a flock of religious leaders, including several rabbis, called for a major expansion of public health insurance recently, they cited Isaiah 1:17. Other calls for health reform are supported, supposedly, in Ezekiel 34:4. Environmentalists heed the words of Hosea 4:1-3 or Micah 4:1-4. Reducing the jail sentences of drug offenders is evidently the theme of Ezekiel 33:1. And no call for “social justice” is complete without a tip of the hat to Isaiah 58.
Justifying modern positions with a few sound bites from ancient texts is one of the oldest tricks in the book, used liberally by both right and left and by adherents of all faiths. Borrowing a few phrases from the prophets is a surefire way to connect the faithful to an issue they would not otherwise understand, and give to it the poetry lacking in floor speeches on C-Span.
But that doesn’t mean it’s wise. The prophets are a little thin on the details. Isaiah talks of “buying food without money, wine and milk without cost.” Tell that to the grocer.
Prophets were by definition lousy leaders: Nobody listened to them, and their predictions of doom fell on deaf ears. They railed against things like vanity and pride, lust and greed, idol-makers and the uncircumcised. Their calls for fealty to God were straight from the “do this or die” school of scare mongering. And on balance, they were a dreary, anti-social lot. I doubt seriously that Jeremiah or Amos could have gotten elected to city council, let alone Congress.
Good thing, too. The world inhabited by the prophets was one of dark and light, good versus evil. If we ever need a prophet to guide us, it would probably signal that something truly terrible had happened in our own time — a massive plague, a reign of terror imposed by an enemy, the exiling of our people to distant lands.
And so perhaps the prophets are not quite up to the task of informing our health care reform debate. Yes, our health care system is an expensive and messy jumble of state and federal mandates, private insurance rules and practices and a remarkable level of specialization — so we could use all the help we can get. But do we really want a few phrases uttered more than 2,500 years ago to determine the course of reforming our health system?
Those few phrases — and trust me, the lines cited by policy advocates are very few among screeds that run for several pages at a time — don’t really deal with the thorny issue of, say, providing publicly paid health insurance to well-off people who don’t want to pay for private insurance themselves. Amos didn’t deal with drug re-imports from Canada, and Hosea didn’t address the right income cutoff level for public health subsidies. If God had wanted us to have the answer to that one, it would probably be found in Leviticus anyway — and last I checked, social-justice types typically don’t want much to do with Leviticus, because that’s where God gets into what we eat, and with whom we sleep.
God, through his prophets, commands us to care for the sick and the needy. He says choose life. The rest is up to us. If He wanted the prophets to actually implement a health care reform agenda, we would know it by now. After all, God is very specific about so many other things in our life, you’d think He would care to send a message through one of his minions about whether He prefers a public co-op health insurance exchange to a public health insurance option.
It’s fine to argue, as liberal Jewish organizations often do, that Jewish texts place great value on care for the sick. But it’s not as if opponents of taxpayer-funded universal health insurance are agents of evil. Rather, many simply recognize that private medicine is superior to socialized medicine in more than a few important respects.
People around the world now survive heart attacks largely because of the innovations created by America’s health marketplace. New medical procedures, new knowledge, new drugs — all have been made possible by our current health care system. True, health care is still expensive, and not everyone enjoys its benefits equally, but in many respects it’s better in America than anywhere else — and if that’s not a way of honoring the prophetic call, what is?
So let’s leave the cloaks of the prophets in our closets and set aside the dog-eared pages of our biblical concordances. The serious work of policy-making involves difficult choices and competing claims — all morally grounded. The prophets did their work. Now let us do ours.
Noam Neusner is the principal of Neusner Communications, LLC. He served as a speech writer and Jewish liaison for President George W. Bush.
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.
Copyright © 2013, Forward Association, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
As First Maharats Graduate, Orthodox Women Leap Forward
Why a Rabbi Should Not Marry Outside the Faith
Why I Only Date Jewish Guys
Taking Aim at Corporate Jewish Burial Business
Barbra Streisand Visits Western Wall After Landing in Israel With Puppy
You've successfully signed up!
Why does the Forward print such Social Darwinist crap? In every other Western country, health insurance is a right, not a privilege. The upshot is that most other Western countries have longer life expectancies while spending less money on healthcare. People without means shouldn't have to go to an emergency room to get treatment. Preventive medicine can save lives and healthcare costs.
america has it's own problems. why are so many people sick anyway? what would Jesus do?
We know what Neusner opposes but not what he wants. Suffice it to say that in the days of W he would have written the screed, prophetic citations and all, to justify the reactionary policies of l'ancien regime. Sauce for the goose and all that...
Healthcare is not - nor has ever been - a "right." It is an "industry," both in terms of the medical profession and, more importantly, the insurance/coverage business. The more government "covers" people, the less rights they have to necessary care as "caps" and "limitations" take effect for those who don't have the money for private services (I know this both by research and personal experience). The government would best serve the public by working to make fair-market, private insurance affordable to all via a regulated economic structure and by vigorously cracking down on "padding" and out-and-out fraud.
Regardless of what one thinks about Healthcare, the question Neusner first raises is it legitimate to invoke Biblical prophets in support of liberal causes. The prophets spoke about the need to assist those in need, not how to do it. It is not so much that these leaders are espousing a form of Judaism that conformed to the the worldview of the prophets, but simply wish to give some religious authenticity to their own liberal agenda. Who knows if Micah were alive to day, would he say, "It has been taught you what is good, support Sotomayor for Supreme Court Justice, love mercy killing for terminally ill and walk humbly with your G-d given right to forbid firearms?"
Noam Neusner, you make me think of the first man, Adam you are much like him. Adam sinned and then blamed G-D for it. Adam, "you G-D gave me the woman, that made me eat of tree." Nice guy this Adam, you Noam Neusner,remind me of Adam when after he sinned, the way he talked to G-D, you speak of the prophets that were given us. I love G-D's prophets, Isaiah 1 Ah, sinful nation, people laden with iniquity, offspring, who do evil, children who deal corruptly, who have forsaken the LORD, who have despised the Holy One of Israel, who are utterly estranged! Why do you seek further beatings? Why do you continue to rebel?. The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even to the head, there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and bleeding wounds; they have not been frained, or bound up, or softened with oil. Your country lies desolate.....
The debate always focuses on the 40 million people without insurance, not the 260 million who have it and mostly like it - and whose system is about to get dismantled by the well-meaning in pursuit of their emotional social justice agenda. Emotional? Yes, just look at the responses of those above who find Neusner despicable just for disagreeing with them - but then these are Jewish liberals we're talking abuot.
The first rule of health care reform should be "Do no harm". Tell that to the vast majority of Americans who will face some form or another of health-care rationing, whose doctors will start drifting out of medicine once they lose their professional independence, when medicine's new civil-service status attracts exactly whom you'd expect to replace them.
GOD is definitely for MORALS and life. That's what Healthcare is all about. I've always been scared NOT to obey him! Terrible things I've seen that eventually happens to those who don't....Too bad we don't have any doctors that are compassionate and moral as Jesus. There would be fewer health problems if we had some.
Bravo Mr. Neusner, you're the first person I've seen try to promote a conservative cause by dissing Biblical figures. Can't imagine this will help your street credibility on the right, but maybe you can align yourself with some right-wing atheists.