Europe Turns Toward Mideast With High-Level Appointments

By Marc Perelman

Published July 03, 2007, issue of July 06, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Led by last week’s naming of Tony Blair as special envoy to the Middle East, a string of personnel changes in capitals across the continent has Europe poised to play a greater role in Israeli-Palestinian affairs.

In Brussels last month, the European Union agreed to grant more power to its foreign policy chief, who has traditionally led Europe’s peacemaking efforts. Both London and Paris, meanwhile, saw the naming of foreign ministers of Jewish descent. David Miliband, son of Holocaust survivors, last week became Britain’s second-youngest foreign secretary. And last month, Bernard Kouchner, whose Russian grandparents perished in Auschwitz, was tapped for the same position across the Channel.

But it was the appointment of Blair, who stepped down last week as British prime minister after 10 years in office, that gave greatest fuel to the speculation that the continent is ready to step into the diplomatic vacuum left by Washington.

A number of European countries want to pursue a more “activist” agenda, former top Clinton official Steven Simon said, and “if they can do this with Blair, European policy in the region might have some legs.”

Blair, who was appointed last week by the so-called Madrid Quartet — composed of the United States, United Nations, E.U. and Russia — will oversee efforts to rebuild the Palestinian economy and Palestinian institutions. Most experts believe, however, that he will eventually expand his mandate and delve into the core diplomatic issues that are supposedly under the purview of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

“It is hard to believe that Blair will focus only on nation building and the like,” said Daniel Kurtzer, a former American ambassador to Israel. “He’s an activist, and it may prove very challenging for Washington to constrain his impulse toward expanding his mission.”

Given the worsening situation in Gaza and the tepid involvement of the Bush administration to date, even a limited mandate may prove challenging for the former British prime minister. While his appointment was welcomed by Israel, Blair’s alignment with President Bush on Iraq has caused lasting damage to his image among Palestinians, according to Rashid Khalidi, head of the Middle East Institute at Columbia University. In addition, Blair’s predecessor as the quartet’s special envoy to the Middle East, former World Bank president James Wolfensohn, left the post in frustration at the lack of momentum behind his peacemaking efforts.

“It is hard to see how he will succeed where Wolfensohn failed, unless — and this is the key — Washington ratchets up its own diplomacy and pursues a parallel track of serious diplomacy,” Kurtzer said.

While all eyes in Washington were on Blair, back in London the spotlight was on the picks of Gordon Brown, the new prime minister, to head Britain’s foreign policy. Miliband, a rising Labor Party star, was given the helm at the Foreign Office, while Simon McDonald, a former British ambassador to Israel who is fondly remembered in Jerusalem, was named Brown’s top foreign policy adviser.

In France, meanwhile, newly elected President Nicolas Sarkozy appointed Kouchner, who is half-Jewish and supported the American-led invasion of Iraq, as his foreign minister. In addition, the French president created the new position of national security adviser to coordinate foreign policy. He tapped for the job Jean-David Levitte, who until recently was France’s ambassador to Washington and whose father was the first director of the American Jewish Committee in France.

The new Jewish face of European diplomacy, however, may not necessarily translate into a dramatic shift in Middle East policy. While Kouchner has so far treaded carefully on Israeli-Palestinian matters, the French government has called a meeting in Paris later this month of all Lebanese political factions, including Hezbollah, prompting a swift condemnation by CRIF, the official Jewish umbrella organization.

Lebanon is also the only publicly known Middle East stance on which the new British foreign secretary has taken a position, and it is far from a staunchly pro-Israel one. Last summer, Miliband, who had just become environment secretary, expressed criticism of London and Washington’s hesitancy in calling for an immediate cease-fire, reportedly asking at a Cabinet meeting, “Where is this all going to end?”

In an interview with Britain’s New Statesman magazine last September, he did not deny making the remarks.

“I felt very worried, because, put it this way, I don’t think that Israel is safer and stronger now than it was two months ago. I don’t think the prospects of a secure and just two-state settlement in the Middle East are closer than they were two months ago,” he was quoted as saying.

The son of a prominent Marxist historian whose family fled Poland and arrived in England in 1940, Miliband, who was educated at Oxford and at the Massachusetts Instutitute of Technology, was recruited by then-opposition leader Blair in 1994 and became his head of policy after Labor’s 1997 electoral triumph. He became a member of parliament in 2001, entered the government the following year and was appointed environment secretary in 2006.

Miliband, to judge by an interview with the Forward in May, is not one to paper over differences with Washington. During a recent visit to the United States to advocate stronger engagement in fighting climate change, Miliband brushed aside the suggestion that Britain was spearheading efforts on the issue as way to recoup some of the international standing it lost by supporting the American-led war in Iraq.

“We have been clear,” Miliband told the Forward, “about our disagreement with the U.S. on this issue.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.