The Pope Has Given Catholics a Choice

By Michael Barclay

Published July 18, 2007, issue of July 20, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

A statement that His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI issued on July 7 has rightfully received a tremendous amount of attention from Jewish and interfaith organizations. Through the “Apostolic Letter in the Form of Motu Proprio” and a subsequent letter to the bishops of the Church, the pope has shifted the liturgical options for Catholics worldwide, causing some to declare that a blow had been dealt to Jewish-Catholic relations.

The criticism is based on the assumption that the apostolic letter approves of the Church returning to a pro-conversion doctrine. A closer look at the pope’s words, however, reveals that this may not be the case at all. In fact, the statement may actually allow Catholics to consciously act in ways that will enhance Jewish-Catholic relations.

The apostolic letter gives permission for Catholics to celebrate mass using the Roman Missal published by Pope John XXIII in 1962, known as the Tridentine Mass, rather than the missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI that has been in use since 1970. It states that the “normal” liturgy will still be the one used for the last 37 years, but that the 1962 liturgy may be used as an “extraordinary expression of the law of prayer.”

The earlier missal is in Latin, and for many Catholics who appreciate Latin as deeply as Jews treasure Hebrew, this statement of the current pope is good news. For Jews, however, it seems far less so, at least at first glance.

The missal of 1962 — while not as offensive to Jews as earlier Tridentine liturgy, which called Jews “perfidious” — contains in it the “Prayer for the Conversion of Jews,” to be said on Good Friday. In this prayer, Catholics are to pray:

“For the conversion of Jews. Let us pray also for the Jews that the Lord our God may take the veil from their hearts and that they also may acknowledge our Lord Jesus Christ. Let us pray: Almighty and everlasting God, you do not refuse your mercy even to the Jews; hear the prayers which we offer for the blindness of that people so that they may acknowledge the light of your truth, which is Christ, and be delivered from their darkness.”

The petition that God does not refuse His mercy even to Jews may perhaps be worthy of appreciation, but this prayer is clearly antithetical to any sort of meaningful ecumenical dialogue. In 1970, the Church also recognized that, and the missal was changed to a prayer that is much more accepting of Jewish belief.

“Let us pray for the Jewish people, the first to hear the word of God, that they may continue to grow in the love of his name and in faithfulness to his covenant. Almighty and eternal God, long ago you gave your promise to Abraham and his posterity. Listen to your church as we pray that the people you first made your own may arrive at the fullness of redemption.”

Currently said on Good Friday, this newer prayer demonstrates a respect for Jews not found in the earlier version. While keeping the identity of the Church, this current version accepts the Jewish choice. It eliminates the offensive language in the earlier prayer, and allows for Catholics and Jews to have theological dialogues without the underlying tensions of one side feeling superior to the other.

Much of the media attention has been based on the assumption that the pope is now allowing the antisemitic dialogue of the earlier prayer back into the liturgy. But a close reading of the pope’s words shows that while the Tridentine Mass can now be practiced, this prayer of Jewish conversion is not necessarily included in the permissive statement.

Article II of the July 7 statement specifically says that any priest may use either the 1962 or the 1970 missal “on any day except in the Sacred Triddum” — that is, during the three days from the evening of Holy Thursday until the evening of Easter Sunday. During the Triduum, Catholics are still to utilize the later liturgy — which does not contain a prayer for conversion of Jews.

During the rest of the entire liturgical year, Catholics will have the right to use either the “ordinary expression” of the last 37 years, or the Latin “extraordinary expression” of 1962. But in either choice, the offensive conversion prayer is not a part of the accepted liturgy.

So if the offensive prayer is specifically excluded, why the commotion?

From 1570 until 1962, the conversion prayer’s liturgical definition of Jews manifested in an increase in antisemitic persecutions leading to abuses, pogroms and even Jewish deaths. Pope Benedict’s acceptance of the Tridentine Mass, even without the overtly offensive conversion prayer, brings up the painful reminder of those horrific experiences and opens a psychological and spiritual wound within many Jews that has only recently begun to be healed through meaningful ecumenical dialogue.

After centuries of persecution, it is only understandable that the pope’s reintegration of the Tridentine Mass is interpreted by many as potentially dangerous. But as understandable as the reaction may be, it would be a shame to miss out on the opportunity to deepen interfaith relations presented by the apostolic letter .

According to the pope’s statement, permission to use the 1962 missal is not given until the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross. On the day of the feast, which this year falls on September 14, Catholics who so desire can once again recite the prayers in Latin that were said in 1962, or they can choose to reject the implications of utilizing this liturgy entirely and continue to pray with the Roman missal that is presently used.

Every Catholic can choose whether he or she wants to pray in Latin or in the vernacular. And every Catholic can now choose whether he or she wants to pray utilizing liturgy that is associated with antisemitism, or cast away that practice entirely in favor of praying in a way that is more respectful of other faiths. Come September 14, the choice is theirs.

On that day, Jews, too, will have a choice. Those of us outside of Israel will be observing the second day of Rosh Hashanah. On the Jewish new year, we are enjoined to take an accounting of ourselves, to cast away our sins through Tashlich and to make repentance. We are enjoined to introspect, but no one forces us — it is a choice.

This year, will each of us — Jew and Catholic — cast away our preconceptions of the other in favor of having honest and meaningful interfaith dialogue? Can we cast out our prejudices and pains, our wounds and self-centeredness, in favor of creating a new time of peace between people of different faiths? Can we choose to really see each other, to value each other’s faith and traditions, and to respect each other as children of the same God?

I pray that we will make choices that allow us to recognize the divinity in each other.

Rabbi Michael Barclay serves in the campus ministry and teaches theology at Loyola Marymount University.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.