American Eccentrics

Doctorow Escapes Being Hemmed in by History

By Benjamin Pollak

Published August 26, 2009, issue of September 04, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Homer and Langley Collyer became reluctant celebrities in the late 1930s when their decaying Harlem mansion began to attract the attention of neighbors and the press. Scions of an old New York family, the Collyer brothers had lived alone in the four-story brownstone since their mother’s death in the late ‘20s, leaving their home less and less often, as Homer lost his eyesight and the once-fashionable neighborhood sank into poverty. Instead, the brothers brought the outside world to them, compulsively collecting, among other things, newspapers, books, outdated medical equipment, pianos (at least 14 were later found), and the better part of a Ford Model T.

By 1947, the brothers had been living without gas, electricity, water, or telephone service for nearly a decade. Booby-trapped tunnels traversed the ceiling-high piles of junk. Police officers, responding to a call, found Homer’s body in one of these clearings, his clothes in tatters, his knees doubled under his chin where they had been frozen into position by arthritis. Surrounding him were more than 150 tons of junk and rusting treasures. It took police and removal crews several more days to find Langley’s body, although it lay only feet away from Homer’s, hidden by the piles of paper that had buried him alive when he triggered one of his own booby-traps.

Not surprisingly, the story of the Collyer brothers has been fertile territory for playwrights and novelists, as well as the journalists who first brought it to the public’s attention. Its latest adaptation, E.L. Doctorow’s gently luminous novel, “Homer & Langley,” breathes new life into the story, endowing the brothers’ seemingly inexplicable actions with a hallucinatory, indigenous American logic. Focusing on the ideas behind their unusual lifestyle rather than on the details of its eccentricity, the novel recasts the brothers’ reclusiveness and hoarding as attempts — if not logical in effect, at least in cause — to tame a recalcitrant world that, in a century of genocide and war, had spun hopelessly out of control.

Narrated by Homer, who in Doctorow’s telling eventually loses his hearing as well as his vision, the events of the novel have a sensual, dreamlike quality. The grotesque details of the real story — the stench of decay that permeated the mansion in the brothers’ final years, its desperate squalor — are replaced by a shadow world of melancholy beauty that Homer evokes through sound and touch. Taking the form of a sustained recollection addressed to Jacqueline Roux, a French journalist who makes a memorable, if brief, appearance toward the end of the book, the story is told with deceptive simplicity and a breathless momentum. Short, declarative statements are distributed like punctuation marks among sentences so long they create their own internal rhythms. Years pass in the space of a few lines or pages as Homer moves between episodes of his life with Langley. A consummate stylist, Doctorow pushes against the limitations imposed by his narrator’s blindness, crafting a narrative in which sound and rhythm do the work usually left to imagery.

Homer’s blindness, in Doctorow’s hands, becomes a metaphor for the brothers’ isolation within their shuttered, unlighted mansion. From the seclusion of their home, they contemplate the external world with the curiosity and detachment of scientists fascinated with the terrible strangeness of their subject. Referring to the Model T inside their house, Langley observes, “You wouldn’t think this car was hideous to behold on the street. But here in our elegant dining room its true nature as a monstrosity is apparent.” At other times, the Collyer mansion resembles a contemporary version of Plato’s cave, a dramatic reminder of the limitations of our knowledge of the world. As Langley reminds us in characteristically didactic style, “among the philosophers there is endless debate as to whether we see the real world or only the world as it appears in our minds, which is not necessarily the same thing. So if that’s the case, if the real world is A, and what we see projected on our minds is B, and that’s the best we can hope for, then it’s not just your problem.

Injured by mustard gas during the First World War, Langley returns to New York embittered, his health ruined and his faith in civilization converted to a sardonic nihilism. Determined to puncture society’s naïve belief in progress, Langley begins to amass an exhaustive newspaper archive that will demonstrate the cyclical nature of history. His plan is to create a single newspaper in which each major category of event — war, crime, murder, automobile accidents, etc. — is rendered in its archetypal, timeless form. For a nickel, as he explains to his skeptical brother, “the reader will have a portrait in newsprint of our life on earth,” complete with the news “of his own impending death, which will be dutifully recorded as a number in the blank box on the last page under the heading Obituaries.”

Though the obituaries for the real Collyer brothers were published only two years after the end of the Second World War, Doctorow has their fictional counterparts live well into the age of computers. Indeed, “Homer & Langley” is as much a story of the American 20th century as it is of the Collyer brothers. Despite withdrawing from the external world, Homer and Langley continue to receive its tidings through the people and objects that find their way into their home. They learn of the Harlem Renaissance from a young jazz musician who stays with them, and of the Holocaust from the door-to-door appeals of Jewish aid organizations. “It was as if the times blew through our house like a wind, and these were the things deposited here by the winds of war,” Homer observes when Langley brings home a bundle of World War II gas masks, boots, and army fatigues. In the 1960s, a group of young hippies, one of whom becomes Homer’s lover, spends a summer in their house, recognizing in the Collyer brothers an affirmation of their fight against social constraint. “I considered the possibility, after drinking too much of their bad wine, that my brother and I were, willy-nilly and ipso facto, prophets of a new age,” Homer muses.

By the end of the book, it’s a possibility we’re prepared to consider as well. “Homer & Langley,” as Doctorow’s finest novels, suggests deeper truths about the lives of its protagonists and the place they occupy in our national mythology, even as it freely rearranges the facts of their biographies. The story of the Collyer brothers, Doctorow shows us, is also a story of the triumphs and fatal excesses of the nation in which they lived. In a country that celebrates individuality, independence, and extravagant consumption as national values, Homer and Langley are, by virtue of their very eccentricities, paradoxically American. As Langley explains in words that could easily have been spoken by the country’s founders, “We will keep our own counsel. And defend ourselves. We’ve got to stand up to the world — we’re not free if it’s at someone else’s sufferance.” More than 60 years after their deaths, maybe it’s not so much the strangeness of the Collyer brothers that makes their story continue to be relevant, but their unnerving familiarity.

Benjamin Pollak is a doctoral student in the English Department at the University of Michigan.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.