How, Why, Who Hates Us

Various Takes on Old and New Antisemitisms

By Jerome A. Chanes

Published November 18, 2009, issue of November 27, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Varieties of Antisemitism: History, Ideology, Discourse
Edited by Murray Baumgarten, Peter Kenez and Bruce Thompson
University of Delaware Press, 248 pages, $75.00.

Efficient Calumny: This Indian entry to the Iran Holocaust Cartoon Contest distills many antisemitic anti-Zionist bigotries. (click for zoom)
Efficient Calumny: This Indian entry to the Iran Holocaust Cartoon Contest distills many antisemitic anti-Zionist bigotries. (click for zoom)

Historian Victor Tcherikover used to say that there are few phenomena in history that have a history of 2,000 years. Antisemitism is one of those phenomena. The cultural antisemitism of the ancient world; Christian religious antisemitism; the racist forms of the modern era, beginning with Voltaire and culminating in the horrors of the destruction of European Jewry — all add to these the “new” antisemitism of radical Islam and virulent forms of “Israelophobia,” and you have a cluster of issues and events that we, in 2009, cannot adequately address. For scholars, it is not merely of theoretical interest to grapple with these issues, but it is also crucial to know how to face them, both now and in the future.

The recent literature on antisemitism has been unusually rich; nevertheless it is deficient in a solid historical and sociological context for the range of 20th-century antisemitica. “Varieties of Antisemitism: History, Ideology, Discourse” (all the book’s editors come from the University of California, Santa Cruz) goes beyond most recent works and fills much of this gap. The varied essays in the volume pick up on a dynamic long known to students of the field: that antisemitism is not a unitary experience; that there are protean aspects of the phenomenon that make it tough to grasp, and that we need to distinguish among the different intensities of antisemitism in specific historical settings and situations. The authors whose works appear in “Varieties of Antisemitism” have the expertise for this analysis. They understand a simple, eternal verity of antisemitism. As a prominent contemporary scholar pointed out, antisemitism is not a “Jewish” issue; it is a “non-Jewish” issue. This is made clear in chapter after chapter.

“Varieties of Antisemitism” is extensive, yet compactly contoured. The book’s three sections cover the range of antisemitism worldwide. In “Rethinking the Holocaust,” the editors wisely use the Holocaust as a vehicle for exploring the impact of antisemitism from new and often unexpected perspectives, and look at “ways in which the Holocaust received its impetus from antisemitism and also, conversely, gave antisemitism a new energy.” Sounds like a no-brainer? The essays in “Rethinking the Holocaust” offer startlingly fresh perspectives. They range from the connections that David Biale makes between the venerable blood libel and Nazi antisemitism, through István Deák’s fascinating trip (in “Hungary and the Holocaust”) across a few months in 1944 — puncturing more than a few balloons of conventional wisdom along the way — to Joshua Zimmerman’s noteworthy analysis of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. Unlike most academic essays, each of the six chapters in “Rethinking the Holocaust” is a page-turner.

Page-turners also populate the second section — the eponymous core of the book — “Varieties of Antisemitism,” which examines 20th-century antisemitism across a sweep of countries. Using Poland, Hungary, Russia and South Africa as exemplars, the section analyzes political issues, historical events (Carol Fink’s comparison of the 1918 and 1919 Lemberg and Pinsk pogroms, and Anthony Polonsky’s “The Jedwabne Debate: Poles, Jews, and the Problems of Divided Memory,” are especially thoughtful) and representations of antisemitism, both in fiction and in film. On fiction, Phyllis Lassner’s chapter “The Necessary Jew: Modernist Women Writers and Contemporary Women Critics” connects the dots of antisemitism in a number of literary genres and in two writers — Virginia Woolf and Djuna Barnes — and is a good example of what this volume does best: It opens up arenas that the reader thinks he knows something about, and illumines the terrain in a fresh manner.

The third section, “Contemporary Antisemitism After the Holocaust,” will be of most interest to the general reader. In 70 exceptionally concentrated pages, the five essays bring the story to the present day, analyzing post-Holocaust antisemitism. Especially noteworthy is historian Yehuda Bauer’s “Problems of Contemporary Antisemitism,” which challenges the reader’s “received wisdom” on antisemitism’s history and on new realities. Bauer connects the issue of “anti-Israelism” and the condition of the Jew in the Middle Ages, analyzes religious fundamentalism and explores radical Islam.

Is there such a thing as the “New Antisemitism”? These essays make a strong case for an answer in the affirmative.

Curatorial choices in an edited volume are always subjective, indeed idiosyncratic, but “Varieties of Antisemitism” demonstrates the near perfect pitch of its editors. Most of the authors are gedolim, recognized experts in their fields — few say it as well as Deák, Biale and Bauer — and they, among other contributors, survey new territory in terrain that we thought had been well mapped. Not only is almost every chapter in “Varieties of Antisemitism” a contribution to our understanding of the history and sociology of the phenomenon, but there is also a cadence in, and coherence to, the ordering of the chapters, which is a tribute to the skill of the editors.

“Varieties of Antisemitism” moves the conversation beyond the usual discussions of antisemitism’s origins, going well beyond its historical religious, and later, racial, aspects. As the volume’s editors elegantly put it, “Jewishness does not exhibit the plasiticity of Proteus. Antisemitism, alas, does.” And the essays in the collection argue this point well.

Unfortunately, this superb volume is too pricey for most academics and general readers. Moreover, even at this steep price, the volume is missing an index and, more serious, a bibliography. This last is especially lamentable. In the one place where bibliographic references about scholarship on antisemitism are offered — a long note at the end of the otherwise estimable introductory essay — the references are at best misleading and at worst woeful.

For one thing, an endnote does not substitute for a bibliography. Worse, however, is the content of the note: The editors promise us “the best recent surveys” of antisemitism; then they visit upon us Gabriel Schoenfeld’s irresponsible “The Return of Antisemitism” and Ron Rosenbaum’s valuable but ultimately hysterical anthology, “Those Who Forget the Past: The Question of Anti-Semitism.” These, in the company of solid works by Walter Laqueur, David Kertzer, Salo Baron, David Berger, and others, mislead the reader and raise questions about the editors’ judgment. A service to readers, including scholars, would be, at the least, a well-considered freestanding bibliographic note.

But one endnote ought not diminish the accomplishments of this splendid book. The essays in this volume give us much new information; what’s more, they give us fresh analysis. The best contributions, however, of “Varieties of Antisemitism” are the questions that are raised for us on every page. Prepare to be challenged.

Jerome A. Chanes is a contributing editor to the Forward, and author of the award-winning “A Dark Side of History: Antisemitism Through the Ages” (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, 2001).


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.