Shoah Reparations Plan Draws Criticism

By Nathaniel Popper

Published April 07, 2006, issue of April 07, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

A Hungarian government program offering compensation based on the number of family members killed in the Holocaust is coming under fire from survivors whom the initiative is supposed to be helping.

The Hungarian ambassador in Washington received a letter last week from six survivors who criticized an unusual reparations program that would pay Hungarian survivors $1,800 for each Hungarian parent or sibling killed in the Holocaust. The letter, which was organized after the Forward published an article on the program, said that “the victims do not want to be remembered in the history books as the greedy survivors who accepted the killing of their parents and siblings for any amount.”

The program, which is set to go into effect in the coming weeks, immediately created controversy because it would provide compensation for the death of a relative, creating an implicit equation between a human life and a monetary figure. In the past, reparations programs funded by such countries as Germany and Switzerland have avoided making the link between life and money by compensating for lost property or harm done to the person receiving the funds.

Those past reparations programs have themselves been criticized by survivors, but usually for the inadequacy of the sums involved or for the way the money was distributed. The letter to the Hungarian ambassador is unusual, because it takes on the moral premise of the program.

“Before this, we’ve been criticized for not getting enough money for heirs,” said Stuart Eizenstat, who led the Clinton administration’s efforts to win Holocaust reparations and restitution. “But we’ve never been criticized like this for giving money to heirs.”

The lead author of the letter, Alex Moscovic, said he had not had misgivings about taking funds from past restitution and reparations programs; he was one of the leaders of the effort to win reparations in the Hungarian Gold Train case involving claims that American troops looted stolen property after the war. When Moscovic was originally contacted by the Forward about the new Hungarian program, he said he would take the money rather than leave it to the Hungarian government. Moscovic lost both of his siblings and both of his parents in the Holocaust, and thus would be eligible for $7,200. But after the article appeared in the Forward, Moscovic said he reconsidered his attitude as he thought more about the ramifications of taking the money.

“The issue that is bothering me is how this will go down in future history, as far as our legacy is concerned,” said Moscovic. He formerly led an organization of child survivors in Florida, where he lives.

Moscovic said that he and the other signatories to the letter are not looking for the program to be totally scrapped. Instead they want to see it redesigned so that it provides compensation for the lost childhood of the survivors, or for their suffering as orphans — but not for any lives lost. They also want the Hungarian government to provide an apology for the role of Hungarian officials in the deportation of the country’s 400,000 Jews. The letter asks for a meeting with the Hungarian ambassador, Andras Simonyi, to discuss changing the program. A spokesman at the Hungarian Embassy confirmed that the letter had been received, and they were formulating their response.

It is not clear how representative the letter is of attitudes among the estimated 60,000 Hungarian survivors. The signees do not claim to speak on behalf of any group, though two of them are leaders of prominent survivor organizations. Getting a pulse on Hungarian survivors is difficult, because the only American organization set up exclusively for them has only about 50 members. The leader of that New York-based group, Evi Blaikie, said she had sent out the letter to her members and so far had not heard any objections.

“Most of our members want to sign this letter,” Blakie said. “If [the Hungarians] want to pay a certain amount, it should not be for a parent or sibling.”

A different message, though, came from a leader at the Israeli organization for Hungarian Jews.

“Why should [the Hungarians] have this money in their hands?” said Joseph Bar Yoel, a board member of the Association of Hungarian Emigres to Israel. Bar Yoel, 82, said he would take the money and give it to Jewish National Fund to plant trees in memory of his parents and two brothers.

The new Hungarian reparations effort is actually the revival and expansion of a program from the late 1990s that offered survivors $150 for each parent who was killed and $70 for each sibling. That program did not attract many applicants, because of the small sums and because survivors had only a few months to apply. The details of the program –– which were negotiated with the Hungarian government by the New York-based Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany –– were set to be released this week, and applicants would have a few months to apply. Separate from the letter to the ambassador, Moscovic criticized the Claims Conference in a letter sent to a newsletter for survivors.

“Now the Claims Conference has reached another plateau where they have negotiated a DOLLAR VALUE [sic] for our parents’ and siblings’ ashes,” Moscovic wrote to the All Generations newsletter.

Officials at the Claims Conference said they had no comment. But Eizenstat, the Clinton-era official who helped negotiate past agreements, said that “the Hungarian government should be applauded for the action they’re taking.”

“It’s impossible to substitute adequately any compensation for the grievous losses,” Eizenstat said. “But money is a surrogate which is in effect an apology for wrongs that were committed. This is the way we do it in western jurisprudence.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.