Washington — The new Iran sanctions bill approved December 15 by the House of Representatives not only moved the United States one step closer to ratcheting up the pressure on Tehran, it also revealed a slight reshuffle in the political map of the Jewish community’s left wing.
J Street, the dovish lobby that has become synonymous with breaking conventions of pro-Israel advocacy, has found itself on the same side of the debate as the Jewish establishment backing the legislation, whereas Americans for Peace Now remains the lonely holdout among mainstream Jewish groups in opposing the sanctions legislation.
In supporting the legislation, J Street has taken a step toward the Jewish community’s mainstream, and at the same time has shown there is little daylight between its views and those of the Obama administration. The White House gave a green light for movement on the House bill, though it has urged the Senate to hold off on taking action on a companion bill for the time being.
The Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act, adopted by the House in a 412-12 vote, targets international companies selling refined petroleum products to Iran. It is based on the assumption that creating a fuel shortage in Iran — which despite being a major exporter of crude oil imports 40% of its refined petroleum — would create pressure on Tehran to adhere to the demands of the international community regarding its nuclear program.
The efficacy of such sanctions is in dispute. A recent simulation game at Harvard University concluded that employing unilateral American sanctions against companies dealing with Iran could backfire and result in Russia and China breaking with the United States and negotiating separately with Iran.
But supporters of the sanctions bill argue that it is the most effective measure to create pressure. “Gasoline sanctions will both ratchet up the economic pressure on the regime and remind the Iranian people of how badly the regime has mismanaged the economy and isolated Iran from the rest of the world,” said Mark Dubowitz, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a hawkish group that has briefed Congress on this issue.
Rep. Howard Berman of California, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the author of the bill, made clear throughout the legislative process that he views the use of these sanctions as a last resort, which should be put in place only if all other options fail.
The new sanctions bill has been a centerpiece of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s legislative agenda for more than a year. AIPAC lobbied tirelessly for passage of the bill and was joined by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, an umbrella body representing 50 national groups, in supporting the legislation.
J Street, which bills itself as “pro-Israel, pro-peace,” initially had called on lawmakers to put the bill on hold in order to give diplomatic engagement a chance. On December 7, however, the group issued a statement endorsing the bill, stating that since diplomacy has failed, the time has come to move forward with sanctions.
“This was the next logical step,” said Hadar Susskind, J Street’s policy and strategy director. Susskind said that supporting the bill was consistent with the group’s previous approach and that despite the fact that “not everyone loved” the decision, it had strong support from J Street leadership.
By supporting the bill, J Street joined the majority of the Jewish community and even won praise from a harsh critic — Israel’s ambassador in Washington, Michael Oren, who said in an interview with JTA that he “appreciated” the decision. It was a notable change in tone for Oren, who earlier this month, speaking at the United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism’s biennial conference, had labeled J Street “a unique problem” and called it “significantly out of the mainstream.”
J Street also made clear with this decision that it is sticking with President Obama’s approach to the region even as this approach evolves over time. The group was on the same page as the White House when the administration first asked Berman to put the bill on hold, and it stuck with the administration when it revised its position in light of Iran’s rejection of the nuclear compromise offered in negotiations.
The Obama administration has been demonstrating in recent weeks a dual approach to new sanctions legislation. A congressional aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the State Department had made clear that it does not oppose Berman’s decision to move the legislation forward and bring it to a vote, a move that would enable the administration to prove it is ready to crank up pressure against Iran.
At the same time, the administration asked the Senate to hold its version of the bill in order to allow further negotiations with international partners on United Nations-based sanctions. In a December 11 letter to Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg warned that the bill, in its current version, “might weaken rather than strengthen international unity.” He also said that the administration had “serious substantive concerns” about the bill and urged that its consideration be postponed until the new year. The letter was obtained by The Cable, a blog published by Foreign Policy magazine.
The leaders of the Conference of Presidents applauded the House for passing the sanctions legislation and urged the Senate to take swift action of its own. “We hope the Senate will act on the sanctions bill before it during December as well. Time is of the essence,” said the conference’s president, Alan Solow, and executive vice chairman, Malcolm Hoenlein, in a statement.
J Street spokeswoman Amy Spitalnick said that J Street supports passage of the Senate bill.
Americans for Peace Now, the oldest player on the field of left-wing pro-Israel advocacy and a member of the Presidents Conference, is the only mainstream Jewish group to break ranks with the organized Jewish community on the sanctions legislation. In a letter to congressional offices, APN had urged members to vote against the bill, arguing that it ties the hands of the president and that the measures proposed in the bill would target Iranian citizens, not the governing regime.
“IRPSA is akin to using a chainsaw when a scalpel is in order,” APN’s president and CEO, Debra DeLee, said in a statement. She stressed, however, that her group does not oppose the idea of sanctions against Iran, but views the current legislation as flawed.
Contact Nathan Guttman at guttman@forward.com
The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.
Copyright © 2013, Forward Association, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Claims Conference Chief Knew of $57M Holocaust Fraud Probe Earlier 
Top Dog: Who Makes the Best Kosher Hot Dog in America?
Why Do Jews Intermarry at a Much Higher Rate Than Others?
End Orthodox Monopoly on Jewish Marriage in Israel
Boston Bombers Pal Slain in Florida Eyed in 'Jewish' Triple Murder
You've successfully signed up!
"J Street, the dovish lobby that has become synonymous with breaking conventions of pro-Israel advocacy, has found itself on the same side of the debate as the Jewish establishment backing the legislation, whereas Americans for Peace Now remains the lonely holdout among mainstream Jewish groups in opposing the sanctions legislation."
So far, Israel is the only nuclear power in the Middle East. Per Nathan Guttman, the 21st century lexicon of Jewish English is this: "Dovish" - Moving towards bombing a foreign country "Mainstream" and not "lonely" - if you sign on to above program.
In Gutman's upside down world, how do you describe a group that affirms universal human rights, disarmament and negotiating with one's neighbors? May I suggest "hawkish" and "war-mongering"?
Americans for Peace Now is for some reason a member of the Presidents Conference (it shouldn't be !) but to call APN a "mainstream Jewish group" and a member of "pro-Israel advocacy" is highly incorrect. APN is more often a critic of Israel then a friend . I even feel uneasy to call APN a "Jewish" group...
I am a retired Physician, 89 years old, and willing to do jobs that will help Israel to the limits of my ability. I would like to see peace all over the world, but do not see any way for Israel to endorse that until after the Palestinians and their supporters recognize the basic right of Israel to exist. I would be interested in suggestions about ways I can start being helpful.
Dear Dr. Lillenthal:
You have come to the wrong place if you want information on how you can help Israel.
The Forward, JStreet, and American's for Peace are as ANTI-iSRAEL as any organizations in the USA or Israel. Read this leftist Marxist Paper with a grain of salt on any comments on what is good for Israel.
Dr Lillenthal:
Contact the Zionist Organization of America. They could help you with anything you can contribute to the cause.
Yes, the socialist-Zionists (the same kind of people who founded Forward a century ago) came to settle in the Land of Israel hoped to do so in friendship with the local Arab inhabitants and tried to extend an open hand. But they never understood Islam, just as the present socialists can't either. Especially they know nothing about the underlying hostility they have towards Jews in particular, despite the fact that overall Islam was somewhat more tolerant towards Jews in general. But the very concept of a Jewish Commonwealth there is such anathema to them that the only solution they will ever accept is one of domination over the Jews and Christians. Hamas represents the true face of Islam. So the only "solution" is to totally withdraw back into exile and accept permanent homelessness, dispersion and eventual national disappearance, or to continue to struggle until a better day dawns. Islam's only answer is submission to Muslim domination. It does not respond favorably to offers of cooperation, except as a tactic to eventually bury Israel AND the West as we know it.
Dear Dr. Lillenthal:
You have come to the wrong place if you want information on how you can help Israel.
The Forward, JStreet, and American's for Peace are as ANTI-iSRAEL as any organizations in the USA or Israel. Read this leftist Marxist Paper with a grain of salt on any comments on what is good for Israel.
To my GENUINE JEWISH FRIENDS---and FRIENDS OF TORAH AND ISRAEL:
The usual Forward story on Israel or Judaism is as BS-filled as a Hussein Obama speech. It sounds like a Press Relaease from the George Soros-funded J-Street
I used to subscribe to the Forward---for many years---until the hair loss, caused by the DUCT TAPE with which I had to wrap my head (to keep it from exploding---became too severe.
Sadly, Jews---secular and Kumbayah Jews---do not feel comfortable until we are getting out butts whipped. Whether it is by the Nazis, or the Nazis' successors---radical islam (is there any other kind of islam?)---secualr Jews (such as thew 1920's assimilated German Jews) are a HUGE enemy to Jewish survival. They firmly believe that extreme leftism is the HIGHEST form of Judaism.
I can only recommend a REAL Jewish newspaper, such as the fabulous Jewish Press, or a REAL Jewish organization, such as the ZOA, if you want to know that Judaism, Torah and Israel will survive.
As to the mind-number Obama robots---they are lemmings, praying at teh Obama Golden Calf----when Hussein blows his Pied Piper horn, these lemmings will march off the hill , and die.
PLEASE VISIT THE BUILDING THAT IS/WAS OCCUPIED BY TEH FORWARD----LOOK UP---YOU WILL SEE A RELIEF OF LENIN---YES, LENIN---on the front of the Forward Building.
Do you need further explanation???
NEVER AGAIN IS HERE AGAIN!!
I was disappointed to see J Street line up for unnneeeded sanctions against Iran. Right now, Democrats are affraid to pressure israel into compliance with UN resolutions. A nuclear armed Iran could coerce israel into compliance with UN resolution 194, which guarantees the right of return. As long as Iran doesnt have nukes, the onus on enforcing UN resolutions on Israel falls on the US. This is the reason I and enlightened Europeans support the nuclear armament of Iran-it allows us to get our way on the recalcitrant zionist entity without getting our hands dirty
Why does the Forward give such publicity and space to an organization of Nazi-collaborationist and Saudi Agent-funded Self-Hating, Non-Practicing Jews in Name Only who if they had been around in 1942 would have justly been labelled as Judenrat or Kapo?
(the only difference is that the Judenrat didn't have a choice in the matter; these Leftards DO)
Would the Forward do the same for the Hitlerjugend, Stormfront.org, Hamas, or Al-Mourabition? I think not. But J Street can easily be compared to them!
Interesting how a putz who describes himself as a "rabbi" (Mr. Jutner) and a Fascist retard who claims he's a Republican and Conservative but is even to the Left of Barry O. when it comes to appeasing Islamic Hitlerites (Ron Paul) are on the same wavelength when it comes to Iran.
BEAT THE DRUMS FOR AHMEDINEJEDAD AND KHAMEINI; STAY SILENT WHILE YOUNG WOMEN ARE RAPED AND MURDERED BY THOSE WHO OBAMA AND BIDEN GAVE A PASS TO; LET THE YOUNG MEN THERE WHO YEARN FOR FREEDOM GET SHOT DOWN IN THE STREETS, AND DO LET IRAN BUILD ITS NUKES SO THAT ONE MORNING TEL-AVIV CAN DISAPPEAR UNDER A MUSHROOM CLOUD, OR MAYBE SAN FRANCISCO.
But Jutner, supposedly a Jew (again, doubtful) wants to point fingers at Israel. A Stupid Ass, just like Hannah Rosenthal and the rest of the Nazi-collaborator funded bunch at J Street. And honestly no better than Obama, Ron Paul, Carter, Jim Baker and the rest of the anti-Semites out there.
NY Times. This is the same paper that the heralded "Peace in Our time." Look at it as a glorified comic book. What does one expect.