An Unsightly Challenge to Israeli Sovereignty

The Hour

By Leonard Fein

Published November 28, 2007, issue of November 30, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Generally speaking, once a week is plenty. But now and then the pace of things quickens, and I find myself wishing this newspaper were published three times a week, there being more than enough happening to warrant not one but three columns. This is one such week. What follows, therefore, is three scrunched up columns.

Column 1: At first blush, it’s a head-scratcher. Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri and Dore Gold, former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations and currently president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, speaking from the same talking points?

Here’s Zuhri on November 24: “The time is not right for talks with Israel.” And here’s Gold a day earlier, observing that there’s no point to negotiations “between Israel and the Palestinians at this time.” They’re talking about Annapolis, of course. Zuhri believes “the time is not right” because the Palestinians are divided; Gold believes “the time is not right” because “the diplomatic gaps between the parties on… critical issues [are] unbridgeable.”

The language is the same, but the motives are quite different. Zuhri believes, or at least hopes, that conditions will in due course change: Hamas will displace Fatah on the West Bank, as it has in Gaza, and as Hamas terrorism becomes more sophisticated and more lethal, Israel will be driven to make concessions that it will not make today.

Gold apparently believes that in due course Hamas will collapse and the Palestinians will be pressured into making concessions that are unacceptable to them today; in the meanwhile, time out, no urgency. But: Only genuine reconciliation can finally end the conflict; a lasting peace cannot grow out of the ashes of defeat.

Maximalist demands and expectations are a snare and a delusion. The time is right to act appropriately.

Column 2: Speaking of Annapolis, Boston’s Jewish Russian Telegraph, under the headline “Rice Rapes Israel,” reports on the creation of a new umbrella organization called the Coordinating Council for Jerusalem. The council is an odd alliance, including as it does the Zionist Organization of America, American Friends of Likud, Americans for a Safe Israel — all three secular right-wing organizations — in addition to the Orthodox Union, National Council of Young Israel and, as I count them, at least 14 other Orthodox agencies and organizations, plus a handful of others.

Its stated position is that “Jerusalem is the capital of the Jewish people and the heritage of all Jews everywhere and… we oppose any negotiations which involve possible concessions of Jewish sovereignty or control over Jerusalem.” It is committed “to an intact, secure, undivided Jerusalem under Jewish sovereignty.”

Never mind that Jerusalem is already divided. Never mind that the Israeli government has welcomed negotiations that “involve possible concessions” on Jerusalem, because if Jerusalem were to be taken off the table there would be no negotiations at all; kiss any prospect of peace goodbye.

And never mind that many of these same organizations have historically been brutally critical of American Jews who have publicly opposed this Israeli policy or that. Now comes the Coordinating Council for Jerusalem and says that Jerusalem is not the sovereign responsibility of the State of Israel, since it belongs to the entire Jewish people.

Therefore… Therefore, what? Therefore, like the three “no’s” of the Arab states in Khartoum in 1967 — no negotiations, no peace, no recognition — the Jewish people, so to speak, exercises a veto over Israel’s government by announcing its own three no’s: no recognition of Israel’s exclusive sovereignty over Jerusalem, no negotiations and (left unsaid but clearly implied) no peace.

Column 3: On an entirely different matter, last week we witnessed a remarkable and rather disturbing coincidence, an irony on a global scale. On the one hand, we learned that scientists have figured out how to make fetal stem cells out of healthy adult cells. If this is really so, then some time in the next 50 years or so we will likely see an end to debilitating disease.

The magic of fetal stem cells is that they can be used to regenerate damaged cells of any kind at all, and then introduced into the same body from which the healthy adult cells were harvested. No immune response, no rejection. Ultimately, life expectancy will soar. Who needs a fountain of youth when we have a geyser of illness-free old age? A new world — except that we’ve also been informed in no uncertain terms that climate change is well on its way, that in the next 50 years or so, perhaps sooner, we will experience potentially catastrophic changes well beyond the mere warming of average temperatures: vast new deserts, lethal flooding of coastal areas as the sea levels rise, the wholesale destruction of species. Real-time disaster.

So now that we are on the verge of a giant leap forward in life expectancy we are also on the verge of a giant collapse of the ecosystem.

The stem-cell breakthrough is the product of human genius, of imagination and persistence and collaboration, of a universal scientific imperative to pursue knowledge, understanding and even wisdom. The climate breakdown is the product of human indolence, of selfishness and even rapacity, of political fecklessness and the endless pursuit of things.

The tree of life, the tree of knowledge, but one bite too many of the apple. Who can any longer be certain there is no Satan, with an (appropriately) diabolical urge to have the last bitter laugh?

I think of Sondheim’s “Send In the Clowns”: “Just when I’d stopped opening doors, finally knowing the one that I wanted was yours, making my entrance again with my usual flair, sure of my lines — no one is there.” Neither bang nor whimper, just Satan’s smug laughter.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.