The Puzzle of Algiers

Published December 14, 2007, issue of December 14, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Algiers, the city once synonymous with armed Arab insurgency, recaptured its status this week, if only for a moment, as a symbolic ground zero in the shadowy drama we call the war on terror. The grotesque carnage visited on the Algerian capital Tuesday morning — two simultaneous car bombs, close to 70 dead, most of them either schoolchildren or United Nations refugee workers — caused people around the world to catch their breath for a moment at the macabre senselessness of it.

A moment later, many of us shook our heads in confusion and tried to remember why this day was different. With Islamic extremists setting off bombs almost daily in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Turkey and heaven knows where else, why should the bloodshed in Algiers stand apart?

Algiers stood apart because it embodied, in agonizingly precise microcosm, the dreary evolution of this global conflict over the decades. In the 1950s, Algeria became an international symbol of anti-colonial struggle during its eight-year independence war against France, perhaps the bloodiest struggle of any emerging Arab state.

After 30 years of faux-socialist dictatorship, the military succumbed to the post-Soviet rush of idealism and decided in 1994 to democratize and hold elections. At the last minute the generals realized — as others would later find in Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and elsewhere — that the elections were going to be swept by Islamic fundamentalists bent on imposing Iranian-style theocracy. The junta canceled the elections.

Civil war ensued. The army vowed to root out the Islamists and prepare the nation for secular democracy. Ten years later, facing stalemate, the government declared the war over and announced a general amnesty. But the Islamists turned it down; they had by now morphed from a local theocratic party into a branch of Al Qaeda bent on world jihad.

This week, with their bombs, they announced their goals. They are at war with France, Europe and Western infidels. They are at war with schoolchildren. They are at war with the world, as embodied in the humanitarian programs of the United Nations.

Now Algeria’s rulers must decode the lessons. Did they miss an opportunity a decade ago to tame the Islamists and bring them inside, before they morphed into a monster? Or did they merely unmask this week the true face of a monster that they and the world have no choice but to fight to death? And if it is a fight to the finish, just what would that mean?

Coincidentally or not, Israel faced much the same dilemma this past Tuesday morning. An armored Israeli column was sent deep into Gaza that day to dismantle rocket crews under fundamentalist Hamas control. Israel was due the very next day to enter renewed urgent peace talks with the Palestinian Authority. The Gaza incursion, they knew, was bound to sour the talks’ opening. Palestinian leaders, however anti-Hamas, cannot ignore street anger over an Israeli incursion — any more than an anti-settlement Israeli government can ignore a terrorist attack on settlers.

Hence, the dilemma: Israel’s government cannot afford to overlook persistent rocket attacks on its cities, particularly when it is about to discuss painful concessions to the Palestinians. But the Palestinian leadership cannot afford to ignore armed incursions into its territories, particularly when it is about to discuss painful concessions to Israel. The peace talks are thus hostage to Hamas. And Israel cannot let itself talk to Hamas.

Or can it?

Some Israelis say it’s time to engage Hamas, in hopes of moderating its positions, before it spins into Al Qaeda’s orbit. Others, a majority, insist it’s suicidal to talk to Hamas; it will only legitimize Israel’s sworn enemies. Each side warns that the other path leads to disaster, but they’re both guessing, and no one can know the answer until it’s too late.

What to do? Well, they might try asking the Algerians. They’ve got years of experience — and they still don’t have a clue.






Find us on Facebook!
  • British Jews are having their 'Open Hillel' moment. Do you think Israel advocacy on campus runs the risk of excluding some Jewish students?
  • "What I didn’t realize before my trip was that I would leave Uganda with a powerful mandate on my shoulders — almost as if I had personally left Egypt."
  • Is it better to have a young, fresh rabbi, or a rabbi who stays with the same congregation for a long time? What do you think?
  • Why does the leader of Israel's social protest movement now work in a beauty parlor instead of the Knesset?
  • What's it like to be Chagall's granddaughter?
  • Is pot kosher for Passover. The rabbis say no, especially for Ashkenazi Jews. And it doesn't matter if its the unofficial Pot Day of April 20.
  • A Ukrainian rabbi says he thinks the leaflets ordering Jews in restive Donetsk to 'register' were a hoax. But the disturbing story still won't die.
  • Some snacks to help you get through the second half of Passover.
  • You wouldn't think that a Soviet-Jewish immigrant would find much in common with Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But the famed novelist once helped one man find his first love. http://jd.fo/f3JiS
  • Can you relate?
  • The Forverts' "Bintel Brief" advice column ran for more than 65 years. Now it's getting a second life — as a cartoon.
  • Half of this Hillel's members believe Jesus was the Messiah.
  • Vinyl isn't just for hipsters and hippies. Israeli photographer Eilan Paz documents the most astonishing record collections from around the world:http://jd.fo/g3IyM
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.