Friction Where Heaven Meets Earth

Three Religions Write About the Sacred Esplanade

A Rose by any Other Name: The plaza to the left is the Kotel, the western retaining wall for the Temple. The Dome of the Rock (gold dome) and the Al-Aqsa Mosque (black dome) now sit atop Haram al-Sharif.
A Rose by any Other Name: The plaza to the left is the Kotel, the western retaining wall for the Temple. The Dome of the Rock (gold dome) and the Al-Aqsa Mosque (black dome) now sit atop Haram al-Sharif.

By Jo-Ann Mort

Published February 08, 2010, issue of February 19, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Where Heaven and Earth Meet: Jerusalem’s Sacred Esplanade
Edited by Oleg Graber and Benjamin Z. Kedar
University of Texas Press, 412 pages, $75.

This book of authoritative essays, artwork and photographs is a labor of scholarly love that, through the joint intellectual efforts of Jewish, Muslim and Christian scholars, brings down to earth the heavenly concerns surrounding the Sacred Esplanade; 150,000 square meters, holy to three religions for the past three millennia. The very fact of this joint project of scholars from Hebrew University, Al-Quds University — the main Palestinian university in Jerusalem and the West Bank — and the Ecole Biblique et Archeologique Francaise de Jerusalem proves that even if the Israelis and Palestinians, or Jews, Muslims and Christians, cannot agree on a shared narrative about this spot, they can all present their disagreements in reasoned, readable, concise prose.

There is probably no piece of real estate in the world today that inflames such passions among the three great religions. For Jews, this Esplanade, known as the Temple Mount, is the site of the Western Wall, the Kotel. It was home to the Solomonic and Herodian temples and where, messianists believe, a third Temple will stand someday. For Christians, it is the site of the Herodian Temple visited by Jesus. For Muslims, this is Haram al-Sharif, where the Prophet Muhammad made his ascent to heaven, home both to the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

In modern days, tensions have ebbed and flowed here since Jerusalem was reunited following the 1967 Six Day War and Israeli law was extended to East Jerusalem, including the Temple Mount, though the Waqf, or Islamic authorities, rejected Israeli civilian law, proclaiming unilaterally that Jordanian law would continue on the site as it had since 1948. And, for about 20 years, this tacit understanding basically held until the first intifada, in 1987, led to more religious radicalization by Jews and Muslims. Finally, the 1996 Israeli decision to open the northern exit of the Western Wall Tunnel under Haram al-Sharif and the Temple Mount really caused violent demonstrations. Muslims feared that this new act would have a negative impact on the Islamic character of the area and, more concretely, suspected that it had also caused cracks in the walls of Islamic holy buildings near the Western Wall.

The area in question was made into a tinderbox by a combination of Israeli state action and incitement by both Jewish and Muslim fundamentalists. On September 28, 2000, the conflict was touched off by then prime minister candidate Ariel Sharon’s walk on the Esplanade, igniting the second intifada.

So, can human rationality prevail?

Al-Quds University’s president, Sari Nusseibeh, a well-regarded philosopher and member of a prominent Jerusalem family, invokes God in hoping the answer is yes. In his essay, he discusses the story of the sacrifice of Isaac, believed to have taken place on the site of the Dome of the Rock, also the place of the Prophet Muhammad’s supposed ascension. Arguing that a place becomes sacred through practice — not through divine decree — he wonders if God, who halted Abraham from sacrificing his first born, could “be made to feel better by men fighting over that spot, killing and getting killed over it, dismantling or demolishing it…. In the final analysis, spilling (human) blood over the rock can only be a secular practice, not a divine wish or command!”

Indeed, blueprints for sharing the site exist in recommendations put forward by former president Bill Clinton and the extra-parliamentary group, the Geneva Initiative, a joint group of Israelis and Palestinians. Both call for an open Old City. Geneva offers a detailed scenario, calling for a multinational presence to monitor, verify and assist in maintaining the openness of the Old City; there would also be a security and conservation unit to maintain safety and upkeep. Israeli soldiers and police would not be left to handle crowd control; an international regiment acceptable to both sides, with an endowment from donors around the world, would diffuse tensions.

These recommendations are less stark than some that preceded them. One of the editors, Oleg Graber, shares tantalizing tidbits, like when, in 1953, he visited what is now known as the Western Wall Tunnel with the Jordanian inspector of antiquities in Jerusalem, and they discussed developing discotheques in the space as a lure for tourists! The author points out that noted religious scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz echoed this proposal in Haaretz in 1967, after Israel captured the area, to turn the prayer plaza in front of the Kotel into Israel’s largest discotheque, to be named “The Divine Presence Discotheque.” Meanwhile, Kedar tells us, in 1960, Egyptian engineers in charge of restoring the Dome of the Rock suggested transforming the “Stables of Solomon,” now the Marwain Mosque, into a parking lot. These musings show how far the situation has moved, going from one of man-made history to one of celestial antagonism.

Indeed, the question that must be asked by the politicians who, after all, will decide what happens to this divine space, is whether the sharing of this sacred space takes away from its holiness for any one religion. In a terrifically spirited personal account, Hebrew University’s president, Menachem Magidor, an agnostic, asks: “Why does a space which is dedicated to man’s access to God arouse in me, and in many of my secular friends, such deep emotions?… There are very few places that are so central to the joint narrative of my people… [but] I did not feel bothered by the fact that another religion was dominating the site… though the feeling of continuity, of being part of a long chain, is overwhelming.”

For in the end, it is mortals, not God, who dominate this Esplanade; we can only hope that rationality and wisdom will dominate the plan for the Esplanade’s next millennia, as they do in this valuable collection of essays.

Jo-Ann Mort writes frequently about Israeli and Palestinian issues. Her essay on Jerusalem is in the Winter 2010 issue of Dissent magazine.






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.