Sights Unseen

A Tel Aviv Photography Exhibit Focuses on What’s Not There

What Happened Here?: Efrat Shalem’s photographs show crime scenes, minus the crimes.
EFRAT SHALEM
What Happened Here?: Efrat Shalem’s photographs show crime scenes, minus the crimes.

By Akin Ajayi

Published July 14, 2010, issue of July 23, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

‘Cameras are everywhere, especially in places where disasters suddenly erupt, creating the illusion that no catastrophe is left unphotographed,” Ariella Azoulay observed of “Untaken Photographs,” an exhibit she curated. “But regime-made disasters — which usually do not erupt suddenly, continue for some time and lack a spectacular visual dimension — tend to evade the archival filter, or to destroy it.”

Photography purporting to record catastrophic events should not be seen as a definitive record of what has taken place, Azoulay, a curator and documentary filmmaker, seems to suggest. At best, it is but a point along a continuum of events; it is for the viewer to resolve the question of, “What can be seen of regime-made disasters when cameras are not present to document them?”

“Untaken Photographs” is currently showing at the Tel Aviv gallery of Zochrot — an Israeli organization dedicated to promoting public engagement with the Palestinian narrative of the 1948 War of Independence — and is founded on the idea that accounts of political violence are inevitably determined and disseminated by the perpetrators of that violence.

While photography can sometimes offer an opportunity to challenge the orthodoxy of a flawed historical narrative, in this exhibition, the emphasis is on absent documentation. Photographs taken before and after the events inform a fuller understanding of what happened when cameras were either absent from the scene or unable to record a full account of what occurred.

The exhibit, which was awarded the 2010 Igor Zabel curator’s prize of the Ljubljana Museum of Modern Art, presents six photographic essays exploring the interpretive possibilities created by so-called untaken photographs. It includes landscape photography of Ayn al-Zaytun, a destroyed Palestinian village in northern Israel, by Miki Kratsman and Boaz Arad; reconstructions by the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem of the use of torture by Israel’s security services before the practice was outlawed by the high court in 1999, and stark low-tech imagery of Jaffa by Aïm Deüelle Lüski, intended to articulate the “nonevent” of the Nakba.

Also on display are photographs by Dor Guez of the city of Lod, recalling the unacknowledged history of the once mixed city of al-Lydd, and Efrat Shalem’s photographs of unidentified suburban locations, distinguished by the bleak one-sentence descriptions of acts of violence — generally against women — committed there.

The unifying factor of the exhibition is not what the pictures themselves portray, but rather what they leave unsaid. As Kratsman and Arad explain in the exhibit’s catalog, “Our intention is not to take on the roles of historians and point out a conclusive truth, but to use photography to raise questions regarding the place and the event that are encompassed in silence. [We] leave it to the interested spectator to carry on the detective work and move back in time from the moment of the photograph.” This approach reminds the viewer that they, too, are a part of the photographic dialogue; they must take responsibility for excavating the context that formulates the picture.

This approach moves beyond the traditional emphasis on the aesthetics of photography, and is informed by arguments advanced by Azoulay, who also teaches visual culture and contemporary philosophy at Bar-Ilan University. In her book “The Civil Contract of Photography” (Zone Books, 2008), she argues that “the citizen of photography enjoys the right to see because she has a responsibility towards what she sees.” The observer is a party to the contract created by the photograph, and thus has as much a responsibility as the photographer or the subject to the truth, as represented by — and beyond — the photograph.

“The photograph is out there, an object in the world,” Azoulay writes. “Anyone, always (at least in principle), can pull at one of its threads and trace it in such a way as to reopen the image and renegotiate what it shows, possibly even completely overturning what was seen in it before.”

Azoulay argues that the exercise of this civic responsibility, as she formulates it, becomes meaningless if it acknowledges without comment what she describes as people with “impaired” citizenship — women, for instance, who suffer from an institutionalized “narrowed living space,” or the stateless Palestinian citizenry. In this sense, photography offers a challenge: to engage with the truth at which it hints, rather than to take it in, literally, at face value.

Some may hesitate to accept Azoulay’s principled approach to engagement with photography. In an otherwise positive review of “The Civil Contract of Photography” in Bookforum, for example, William T. Vollmann took issue with Azoulay’s acceptance of the description “photo rape,” which was appended to a photograph of Palestinian women sitting in the rubble of a demolished house by Israeli artist Michal Heiman. This, he argued, was a mean-spirited interpretation of the news photographer’s role in cataloging disaster and misfortune.

Vollmann’s misgivings aside, however, it is hard to challenge the underlying principle: One cannot observe photography passively when it presents — or hints at — images of tragedy and violence. And in “Untaken Photographs,” Azoulay makes passivity practically impossible.

Akin Ajayi is a freelance writer based in Tel Aviv. He contributes to The Jerusalem Post, The Times Literary Supplement and other publications.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.