Fish(y) Forms

Early Works Illuminate Frank Gehry’s Aesthetic

By Gavriel Rosenfeld

Published September 15, 2010, issue of September 24, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The High Holy Days might incline most Jews to think of fish as a traditional food served on deli trays after Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur services. But the Jewish Museum’s new exhibition, “Fish Forms: Lamps by Frank Gehry,” asks us to think more deeply about how fish have influenced the work of one of the world’s most celebrated architects.

Given the complex nature of Gehry’s architecture, it is ironic that the exhibition is minimalist in character. In a single room stand eight of Gehry’s fish lamps, glowing warmly in their dimmed gallery setting. A brief text mounted on the wall explains that the lamps were designed between 1983 and 1990 and made of a plastic laminate, called ColorCore, from the Formica Corp. As the by-now legendary story has it, Gehry was experimenting with the material one day in 1983 when he dropped a piece on the ground, shattering it; after noticing that the fragments resembled scales, he decided to make a fish out of them, spawning his first fish lamp.

How this fortuitous event shaped Gehry’s subsequent architecture is explained by a short video slideshow accompanying the exhibition. It reveals how, by the mid-1980s, Gehry began using fish forms on a larger scale, at first realistically, as with his 70-foot-high fish sculpture at his Fishdance Restaurant in Kobe, Japan (1986-87), and later more abstractly, as with his enormous copper fish sculpture at the Vila Olimpica in Barcelona (1989-92). In reducing the fish to the essence of its form, Gehry discovered a new architectural language of movement, one that culminated in his celebrated Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in Spain (1997), a building whose curvilinear form and metallic skin can ultimately be traced back to Gehry’s early lamp designs.

  • Image 1
  • Image 2
  • Image 3
  • Image 4
  • Image 5
  • Image 6
  • Image 7


As far as it goes, the exhibition makes a strong case for the influence of fish forms on Gehry’s architecture. But it could go further. Surprisingly, especially given its location, the exhibition neglects to probe the deeper Jewish dimensions of Gehry’s fish fetish. While the exhibition text dutifully mentions the architect’s oft-cited childhood recollection of his grandmother keeping a live carp in the bathtub for making gefilte fish, it fails to tie this anecdote — and the symbolism of fish more broadly — to Gehry’s sense of Jewish identity.

Although the exhibition implies that Gehry viewed the fish positively as a symbol of traditional Jewish folkways, it does not mention that it was also a symbol of Jewish suffering. During his youth in Timmins, Ontario, Gehry was frequently beaten up by children who, having gotten wind of his grandmother’s peculiar culinary traditions, taunted him with such names as “fish eater” and “fish head.” These and other experiences of anti-Semitism ultimately led the architect to flee from his Jewish identity as an adult, a choice epitomized by his 1954 decision to change his surname to Gehry from Goldberg.

Beginning in the early 1980s, however, at precisely the time when he was commencing his architectural rebellion against modernism and postmodernism, Gehry sudden ly began speaking openly about his Jewish background, repeatedly describing his newfound interest in fish forms as rooted in his childhood experiences. Why Gehry made these sudden shifts demands an explanation, but the exhibition leaves the question unasked.

Indeed, if anything, the exhibition de-emphasizes the relevance of Gehry’s Jewish background. The wall text, for example, inexplicably includes a disclaimer about the carp story that reads: “Gehry has since discounted the significance of this anecdote.” Similarly, the text sanitizes the reasons for the architect’s name change, explaining merely that “he had been picked on as a child,” without mentioning anti-Semitism.

Since Gehry has spoken openly about these matters for decades, it is unclear why the Jewish Museum would be reluctant to probe the Jewish aspects of his work. But an institution that has long been sensitive to charges of ethno-religious parochialism — a topic highlighted in the museum’s 1996 exhibition “Too Jewish?” — may have chosen to play it safe and treat the fish as a neutral symbol.

This is appropriate, perhaps, given the pareve status of fish in the Jewish tradition. But visitors to the exhibition may ultimately feel that it has merely whetted their appetites rather than satisfying their hunger for more.

Gavriel Rosenfeld is associate professor of history at Fairfield University in Fairfield, Conn. His latest book, “Building After Auschwitz: Jewish Architecture and Jewish Memory Since the Holocaust” (Yale University Press) will appear in the fall of 2011.

Fish Forms: Lamps by Frank Gehry is showing at the Jewish Museum, New York, until October 31.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.