Is Glenn Beck After the Wrong Billionaire?

Good Fences

By J.J. Goldberg

Published November 24, 2010, issue of December 03, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

If you’ve kept up with the outraged tsunamentary (“tsunami of commentary” — I made that up) following Glenn Beck’s televised sliming of billionaire currency trader George Soros, you might suppose there’s nothing left worth saying about it. But you would suppose wrong. There’s much more to say.

Beck, the top-rated bloviator at top-rated Fox News, spent three consecutive evenings in mid-November depicting Soros as a megalomaniacal empire-builder who collaborated with the Nazis during childhood and now masterminds a vast left-wing conspiracy to destroy America. It was a baroque pastiche of manipulated quotes, half-truths and outright lies, skillfully crafted into a frightening admonition and, perhaps, a call to arms.

The part you’ve probably heard about, the part that’s got critics agitated, is Beck’s claim that Soros, a Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor, was a Nazi collaborator. He was referring to Soros’s own descriptions of survival at age 14 in Nazi-occupied Budapest. Posing as the “godson” of a non-Jewish local official, young Soros tagged along when his “godfather” inventoried confiscated Jewish property or delivered deportation notices. How did Beck put it? “Here’s a Jewish boy helping send the Jews to the death camps.”

It’s a horrible thing to say about any Jew trying to survive the Nazi nightmare, let alone a child, and Beck was rightly denounced. The Anti-Defamation League called it “horrific” and “repugnant.” Elan Steinberg of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and Their Descendants called it “a particularly monstrous lie.” The left-wing blogosphere had a field day with it. Even the right piled on. Reason magazine called the canard “appalling on a human level.” At Commentary magazine, executive editor Jonathan Tobin called it “simply inadmissible.”

Tobin took an essential next step that seemed to elude most critics: After condemning Beck’s collaboration slur, he went on to note the perverse combination of ignorance and dishonesty pervading Beck’s overall screed. For example, Beck illustrated Soros’s supposed lust for global domination by repeatedly reciting the financier’s record of undermining various regimes, and playing a clip of Soros boasting of his “subversive activity.” Beck’s audience, Tobin wrote, “had to assume that it was part of some leftist conspiracy that he [Soros] was funding. Beck left out the fact that what Soros was talking about was his Cold War-era funding of movements that sought to support anti-Communist dissidents in countries like Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and the Soviet Union.” Soros, he wrote, was “one of the good guys” there.

As tasteless as Beck’s victim-blaming and other distortions might be, though, his larger project is downright frightening. Throughout his three-hour philippic, he painted an all-too-familiar portrait, complete with grainy black-and-white images and scary horror-film music, of a demonic plot. At the center of it, he stated over and over, stood the almost supernatural figure of Soros, the malevolent, all-powerful and unmistakably Jewish financier bent on subjugating the world for his own profit. We’ve heard this bilge before. But Beck has millions of viewers who take him very seriously.

Nor is this global conspiracy merely metaphor to Beck. He warned of a five-step Soros plan for domination. “In country after country after country,” he told viewers, “we found that there are five steps to him gaining control.” Here is how Beck described them:

Step one: “Form a shadow government using humanitarian aid as cover.” This refers to a network of nonprofits Soros funds and “controls,” from MoveOn.org to the Center for American Progress, as well as his own Open Society Institute, with its tentacles in quiet, unassuming places like Belarus and Georgia.

“Step two: Control the airwaves. Fund existing radio and TV outlets and take control over them or start your own outlets.” Soros does this, Beck explained, by donating to National Public Radio and the liberal watchdog Media Matters for America.

“Step three: Destabilize the state, weaken the government and build an anti-government kind of feeling in this country. You exploit an economic crisis or take advantage of existing crisis — pressure from the top and the bottom. This will allow you to weaken the government and build anti-government public sentiment.…

“Step four: You provoke an election crisis. You wait for an election. And during the election, you cry voter fraud.…

“Step five: Take power. You stage massive demonstrations, civil disobedience, sit-ins, general strike, you encourage activism. You promote voter fraud and tell followers what to do through your radio and television stations.…

“Do any of those sound familiar? This is the way George Soros takes a country down every time.”

It’s too easy to joke about this nonsense. A donation to NPR, even a hefty $1 million, hardly controls the nation’s airwaves. The last time Democrats cried election fraud was in 2000 in Florida, and they got over it pretty quickly. As for weakening the government, weren’t we worried about liberals expanding it? When did weaker government become the problem?

But wait a minute! Something does sound familiar. Didn’t we see anti-government demonstrators going wild in the summer of 2009? Chanting something about an illegitimate government and teabags? Yelling about election fraud and a bogeyman called Acorn? Wait — isn’t someone actually gobbling up the airwaves and telling people how to vote? And weren’t his broadcasters out there leading the chanting?

Of course! It’s kindly old Rupert Murdoch and his News Corp. He has six channels on my cable system alone. He actually pays Republican presidential contenders to pontificate on air. He owns The Wall Street Journal, The Times of London and a major Hollywood movie studio. But he doesn’t pull anyone’s strings, does he? Nah.

Beck can relax. We’ve got Fox guarding our chickens.

Contact J.J. Goldberg at goldberg@forward.com and follow his blog at www.forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Happy birthday Barbra Streisand! Our favorite Funny Girl turns 72 today.
  • Clueless parenting advice from the star of "Clueless."
  • Why won't the city give an answer?
  • BREAKING NEWS: Israel has officially suspended peace talks with the Palestinians.
  • Can you guess what the most boring job in the army is?
  • What the foolish rabbi of Chelm teaches us about Israel and the Palestinian unity deal:
  • Mazel tov to Idina Menzel on making Variety "Power of Women" cover! http://jd.fo/f3Mms
  • "How much should I expect him and/or ask him to participate? Is it enough to have one parent reciting the prayers and observing the holidays?" What do you think?
  • New York and Montreal have been at odds for far too long. Stop the bagel wars, sign our bagel peace treaty!
  • Really, can you blame them?
  • “How I Stopped Hating Women of the Wall and Started Talking to My Mother.” Will you see it?
  • Taglit-Birthright Israel is redefining who they consider "Jewish" after a 17% drop in registration from 2011-2013. Is the "propaganda tag" keeping young people away?
  • Happy birthday William Shakespeare! Turns out, the Bard knew quite a bit about Jews.
  • Would you get to know racists on a first-name basis if you thought it might help you prevent them from going on rampages, like the recent shooting in Kansas City?
  • "You wouldn’t send someone for a math test without teaching them math." Why is sex ed still so taboo among religious Jews?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.