‘American Concern’ Enabled Exodus


By Richard Schifter

Published December 22, 2010, issue of December 31, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

When questioned about his truly shocking statement that if Soviet Jews were put into gas chambers, it would not be “an American concern,” Henry Kissinger has since responded that this quote “must be viewed in the context of the time,” namely the early-1970s debates over how to help Jews escape the Soviet Union.

During the 1980s, I served as assistant secretary of state for human rights and was deeply involved in this issue. My experience leads me to very different conclusions than those offered by President Nixon’s secretary of state and national security adviser.

In his recent statement, Kissinger said he objected to the Jackson-Vanik Amendment because he opposed making Jewish emigration “a foreign policy issue.” Instead, he noted, the Nixon administration made “private representations at the highest level” that “managed to raise emigration from 700 per year to close to 40,000 in 1972.” Regarding Jackson-Vanik, he said, “We feared that the Amendment would reduce emigration, which is exactly what happened. Jewish emigration never reached the level of 40,000 again until the Soviet Union collapsed.”

Kissinger’s analysis is not reflected in the actual emigration data. He was close on the 1970 emigration figure, which was 1,027. His quiet diplomacy during detente did increase that number to an annual average of 20,516 from 1971 to 1974. But after Jackson-Vanik’s passage in 1974, the average for 1975 to 1978 dropped only slightly to 18,271 annually. Then, in 1979, the number of emigrants jumped to 51,320, much more than anything achieved under the Nixon-Kissinger policy.

But in December 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, resulting in a serious deterioration of U.S.-Soviet relations. Jewish emigration figures concurrently dropped sharply, reaching a low of 876 in 1984. The following year Mikhail Gorbachev became the Soviet leader, and relations with the U.S. as well as Soviet domestic conditions began to change for the better, slowly at first and more profoundly later.

In early 1987, as the first improvements in Soviet respect for human rights were noted, Jewish emigration figures rose slightly. President Reagan and Secretary of State George Shultz made it clear that the issue of Soviet emigration policy was an issue that affected U.S.-Soviet relations and was to be raised at high-level meetings, meetings whose principal purpose was to discuss arms control.

The task of getting down to specifics was left to me. Thus, in advance of a high-level arms control meeting scheduled for September 1987 in Washington, I traveled to Moscow to see what we could accomplish regarding refusenik cases.

At the Moscow airport, I was met by a Soviet Foreign Ministry official who accompanied me to all the meetings I had during the next two days. The Foreign Ministry had made arrangements for me to meet officials at the OVIR, the Interior Ministry office that handled emigration cases.

At the OVIR, I received responses to a number of cases that involved applicants for exit permits who wanted to join relatives in the United States. But when I turned to a list of cases of refuseniks who wanted to emigrate to Israel, I was told that applicants for exit visas to other countries would not be discussed with the United States.

In keeping with the Reagan-Shultz policy approach of linking human rights concerns with other aspects of foreign policy, I returned to the Foreign Ministry and told my counterpart there that I would deliver a report on my unsatisfactory meeting at the OVIR to Secretary Shultz and that he would undoubtedly raise the issue with Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze at their upcoming arms control meeting.

The following day, as I was leaving Moscow, I encountered at the airport the Foreign Ministry official who had greeted me upon arrival. He bought me a cup of tea, took me to the VIP lounge and said: “That list of names that they did not want to discuss at the OVIR, give it to me.” I dug into my briefcase and handed him the list. It included such well-known names as Ida Nudel and Vladimir Slepak. In the message that I then sent to Shultz, I wrote — using a famous Dean Rusk quote — that the other side “has just blinked.” Two months later, Nudel and Slepak and many others on the list received exit permits.

The official U.S.-Soviet emigration dialogue continued, dealing not only with special cases, but also with our demand for an end to overall limitations on the number of emigration permits. We did not have to wait long: Early in 1988, we saw a sharp increase in exit permits. When I visited Moscow again in September of that year, it was clear that the Soviet leadership had agreed to lift emigration restrictions as an important element of U.S.-Soviet relations. I traveled directly to Jerusalem and told Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir to get ready for a large influx of immigrants.

In the next three years — before the Soviet Union’s dissolution — 462,659 Jews received exit permits. This was the direct result of the fact that under Reagan and Shultz, Soviet emigration policy was a matter of American concern.

Richard Schifter is chairman of the board of directors of the American Jewish International Relations Institute.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.