A Wisconsin Power Grab


Published February 23, 2011, issue of March 04, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The assault on public-sector unions that began in Wisconsin and is spreading to other states prompts a key question: Should those who work in the private sector have a different set of rights and obligations than the teachers, sanitation workers, firefighters and office managers whose salaries are financed by taxpayers?

“Government unions are not the same thing as private sector unions,” proclaims Jonah Goldberg in a recent column that summed up the argument in defense of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s aggressive attempt to strip state workers of their collective bargaining rights.

Let’s examine that for a moment. True, government workers don’t face the same sort of negotiating adversary as those who toil in the private sector, where profit is king and workers can be treated like serfs, especially in an economy with stagnant wages and high unemployment. In government, supposedly, the bosses are us, reined in by civil service regulations and held accountable on the next election day.

This distinction doesn’t always improve the lot of public-sector workers — studies show that the overall compensation of the kind of workers who are storming the capital in Wisconsin is no higher than if those same folks worked in the private sector. But this fight isn’t about the actual payroll and the dollars that Walker supposedly would save. It’s about power.

Collective bargaining is a power tool, the only way ordinary workers can achieve together what they cannot achieve on their own. Has it led to excesses, to profligate pension schemes, provisions that make it all but impossible to fire incompetent employees, work rules that stubbornly resist modernization? Sure. Those abuses need to be addressed anywhere, but especially when public monies are concerned — monies used to pay those who are supposed to educate our children, monitor our safety and make government more efficient, and too often fail to do so.

But that’s not really the power that Walker, Goldberg, et al want to curb. They want to curtail or eliminate the power of labor unions to use their waning clout and still hefty coffers to influence elections by supporting the Democratic Party and, in this view, maintain government at unsustainable levels. “Put simply, people in the government business support the party of government,” Goldberg argues. “The labor-politician negotiations can’t be fair when the unions can put so much money in campaign spending.”

This argument willfully ignores the other side of the equation — the even heftier coffers and growing clout of corporate America, which is able to match dollar for dollar and then some any union’s attempts to promote certain candidacies and policies. Wisconsin is a case in point: Press reports note that one of the biggest contributors to Walker’s election campaign was Koch Industries, the energy and consumer products conglomerate owned by the uber-wealthy and strangely secretive billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, whose anti-union, anti-environment, anti-regulation views are well known.

Unless this nation is going to take dramatic steps to limit all money in politics, then the ordinary worker — whether in City Hall or on the factory floor — deserves the chance to bargain collectively and counteract the forces in corporate America that freely exercise their right to shape the government they pretend to hate.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • British Jews are having their 'Open Hillel' moment. Do you think Israel advocacy on campus runs the risk of excluding some Jewish students?
  • "What I didn’t realize before my trip was that I would leave Uganda with a powerful mandate on my shoulders — almost as if I had personally left Egypt."
  • Is it better to have a young, fresh rabbi, or a rabbi who stays with the same congregation for a long time? What do you think?
  • Why does the leader of Israel's social protest movement now work in a beauty parlor instead of the Knesset?
  • What's it like to be Chagall's granddaughter?
  • Is pot kosher for Passover. The rabbis say no, especially for Ashkenazi Jews. And it doesn't matter if its the unofficial Pot Day of April 20.
  • A Ukrainian rabbi says he thinks the leaflets ordering Jews in restive Donetsk to 'register' were a hoax. But the disturbing story still won't die.
  • Some snacks to help you get through the second half of Passover.
  • You wouldn't think that a Soviet-Jewish immigrant would find much in common with Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But the famed novelist once helped one man find his first love. http://jd.fo/f3JiS
  • Can you relate?
  • The Forverts' "Bintel Brief" advice column ran for more than 65 years. Now it's getting a second life — as a cartoon.
  • Half of this Hillel's members believe Jesus was the Messiah.
  • Vinyl isn't just for hipsters and hippies. Israeli photographer Eilan Paz documents the most astonishing record collections from around the world:http://jd.fo/g3IyM
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.