Enumerating Jewish Denominations

Do We Have Sects, Movements and Groups Like the Goyim?

By Philologos

Published March 30, 2011, issue of April 08, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Warren Handel writes from Edwardsville, Ill.:

“Perhaps I am mistaken, but I had always understood the term ‘denomination’ to refer to varieties of Christianity. When did the term come into use to describe varieties of Judaism? What terminology did it replace?”

Mr. Handel is not mistaken. Religious groupings such as Lutheranism, Calvinism, Presbyterianism, Methodism and Congregationalism have traditionally been known in English as “denominations.” Ones such as Conservative or Reform Judaism have generally been called “movements.” Is there a difference between the two? Let’s think about it.

“Denomination” comes from late Latin denominatio, the giving of a name to something, which is why differently named coins or monetary units came to be called denominations, too. In the sense of a separately organized church within Christianity, the word has been in use since early 18th-century England. This was a period of British history that, following King James II’s Declaration of Liberty of Conscience in 1687, saw the beginning of an ongoing proliferation of different Protestant churches that split off from the official Anglican establishment. One result was a whole new vocabulary — “low church” and “high church,” “dissenters” and “anti-dissenters,” “establishmentarians” and “disestablishmentarians,” “denominations” and “denominationalism,” etc. — that entered the English language.

Eighteenth-century rabbinic Judaism knew no declarations of religious tolerance like James II’s. Its main “dissenters” were the Sabbatians, followers of the 17th-century messianic pretender Shabbetai Zvi, who were hounded by the rabbinic authorities as members of a kat, the Hebrew word for a heretical sect that had been applied to the Karaites before them. And when, in the late 18th century, Hasidism began, to the dismay of the same rabbinical establishment, to spread through Eastern Europe, it, too, was at first labeled a kat.

True, the pre-modern world of rabbinic Judaism was also split into different religious communities. These, however, were defined by geography and descent rather than by belief, and differed in relatively minor matters of custom and practice, known as minhagim in Hebrew. Such divergences were generally tolerated by the rabbinic authorities, who referred to them, and to the various prayer books that incorporated them, as Minhag Ashkenaz, Minhag Sefarad, Minhag Provence, Minhag Italia and so on. If there were, say, enough Sephardim living in a predominantly Ashkenazi locale, they would form a separate Minhag Sefarad congregation of their own, just as Ashkenazim did among Sephardim, or Provençal Jews did in northern France.

Wise By Name: Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise
was an early Reform leader from Germany.
WIKI COMMONS
Wise By Name: Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise was an early Reform leader from Germany.

Thus, when the early German Reform rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise immigrated to the United States from Bohemia and published the first American Reform prayer book in 1857, he called it “Minhag America.” Yet as Wise knew well, Reform Judaism, which had sprung up in Germany in the preceding decades, was not just another minhag in the rabbinic sense. From a traditional point of view, it was a full-fledged kat, one that defied the basic principles of rabbinic Judaism even more than Karaism or Sabbatianism had done.

German Reform Judaism, of course, did not think of itself that way. But neither did it wish to proclaim itself a separate denomination with a rigorous credo and set of beliefs, like Lutheranism or Presbyterianism. Such a denomination was called a Konfession in German, a word that Reform Jewish leaders declined to use. Rather, they preferred Bewegung, “movement,” which, in the sphere of religion, signified a shared tendency or sensibility, such as pietism or quietism, that was not denominationally bound or delimited. Perhaps they did so because Konfession sounded too Christian to them; perhaps because they wished to stress that they were still part of a continuum of Jewish life from which they did not wish to separate.

In any event, when Reform crossed the Atlantic to the United States, a movement rather than a denomination was what it went on calling itself, as evidenced by its first English history, David Philipson’s 1903 “The Reform Movement in Judaism.” And when Conservative Judaism began to develop in America in the 1880s as a non-Orthodox reaction to Reform, it referred to itself as a movement, too, as did Reconstructionism when it split off from Conservatism in the 1920s. Orthodoxy alone has shied away from the term (American Jews, Orthodox and non-Orthodox alike, do not normally speak of “the Orthodox movement”), considering itself the eternally immovable pillar of Jewish life.

If more American Jews are now speaking, as Mr. Handel writes, of the varieties of Judaism as “denominations,” this might conjecturably come from a desire to bring the terminology of Judaism more into line with the terminology of American religion in general. And yet when one thinks of it, American Baptists or Methodists don’t speak of themselves as members of the Baptist or Methodist “denomination,” either, but as members of the Baptist or Methodist “church.” “Denomination” in contemporary English is a rather sociological-sounding word; it’s what you call someone else’s religion, not your own. Can it be, then, that the real reason more American Jews are now using it is that they have come to regard Judaism as someone else’s religion? I rather suspect that this may be the case.

Questions for Philologos can be sent to philologos@forward.com


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • A grumpy Jewish grandfather is wary of his granddaughter's celebrating Easter with the in-laws. But the Seesaw says it might just make her appreciate Judaism more. What do you think?
  • “Twist and Shout.” “Under the Boardwalk.” “Brown-Eyed Girl.” What do these great songs have in common? A forgotten Jewish songwriter. We tracked him down.
  • What can we learn from tragedies like the rampage in suburban Kansas City? For one thing, we must keep our eyes on the real threats that we as Jews face.
  • When is a legume not necessarily a legume? Philologos has the answer.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.