Dems Allow Lieberman To Retain Key Posts

By Brett Lieberman

Published November 18, 2008.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Washington - Joe Lieberman came out of his day of reckoning quite well.

“This is the beginning of a new chapter,” the Connecticut senator said after a private Democratic caucus meeting held November 18 in the historic Old Senate Chamber. The meeting was held to decide what to do about the fact that Lieberman crossed his Democratic colleagues this year to work as a key supporter for the Republican presidential candidate, John McCain.

As punishment, Lieberman’s colleagues forced him to relinquish his seat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. But at the same time, he was allowed to retain his much more significant positions, as chair of both the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and an Armed Services subcommittee.

Some colleagues and liberal Democrats wanted to punish Lieberman more severely, but when the meeting concluded, Lieberman told reporters that he did not feel chastened. “This was done in a spirit of reconciliation,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was among those lawmakers who, at one point, wanted to punish Lieberman. “I would defy anyone to be any more angry than I was,” he said after the meeting, adding that “there is a period of time in Joe Lieberman’s political career that I will never understand or approve.”

Yet the Democratic leader added that “this was not a time of retribution, it was a time of moving forward on the problems of this country.”

Lieberman was helped by the intensive lobbying effort of those whom he called “four great friends” in the Senate: Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Ken Salazar of Colorado, Bill Nelson of Florida and Tom Carper of Delaware. Rather than condemning Lieberman himself, the four Democrats led a lobbying effort and drafted a resolution that opted to disapprove of statements that Lieberman made about president-elect Barack Obama.

Lieberman was re-elected to the Senate as an Independent after losing the 2006 Democratic primary, but he continued to caucus with Democrats in the Senate.

According to several of those present during the November 18 closed-door meeting, Lieberman did not apologize to his colleagues.

Some of the statements attributed to him during the campaign were inaccurate, Lieberman said.

“There were other statements that I made that I wished I had made more clearly, and there were some that I made that I wished I had not made at all,” he told reporters after the meeting. “Obviously, in the heat of campaigns, that happens to all of us, and I regret that and now it’s time to move on.”

Echoing calls from some lawmakers, as well as from Obama, Reid said it wasn’t a time for Democrats to walk out of their meeting with a feeling of, “Boy, did we get even.”

“I am very satisfied with what we did today. I feel good about what we did today. I don’t apologize to anyone for what we did today,” he said.

Reid and other legislators noted that during Lieberman’s 20 years in the Senate, he has voted overwhelmingly with Democrats, though this isn’t the first time that Lieberman has found himself unwelcome among Democrats.

Part of the reason he lost the 2006 primary is that many Democrats were angered by his continued support of the Iraq War and for President Bush’s foreign policy.

While Lieberman said at the meeting that he was pleased to remain in the caucus, he also highlighted that same independence that’s sometimes proved problematic.

“I appreciate their respect for my independence of mind; that’s who I am,” Lieberman said. “But I’ve also been for 45 years a Democrat, and for the last 20 what I consider to be a member in good standing of the Senate Democratic caucus. That’s what the record shows.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.