Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

The Adelson Factor

Any discussion of Sheldon Adelson’s dominant role in both American and Israeli politics must begin with a fundamental ackowledgement: Everything about it is legal and transparent. But that is what makes it even more troubling.

In just the past month, Adelson and his wife, Miriam, have garnered headlines in the United States by donating a total of $10 million to the super PAC supporting Newt Gingrich in the roller coaster ride that passes for the Republican presidential primary campaign this election cycle. For the eighth richest man in America (according to Forbes magazine), the size of this donation may seem like chump change — especially because, to his credit, Adelson’s philanthropy has extended far and deeply into causes that don’t necessarily serve his stated, sometimes extreme conservative political beliefs.

But to the average American — even one so fortunate as to be able to pay Mitt Romney-level taxes — the sum is astounding. To Gingrich, it was a brilliantly timed lifeline, resuscitating a presidential quest that seemed all but over, with the potential now to shape this consequential contest all the way to November. Adelson owes his wealth to casinos; he is clearly a man willing to gamble audaciously. As such, he becomes the first dramatic illustration of the way the U.S. Supreme Court’s disastrous decision in the Citizens United case has allowed one person unparalleled access to the roaring engine of political campaigning. Sadly, given the stakes of this presidential race, Adelson may not be the last.

We have another concern. In 2007, Adelson launched Yisrael Hayom, or Israel Today, a free daily newspaper that from its inaugural issue was one of the largest circulation papers in Israel, a country that devours news the way America once did. In just a few years, Hayom has soared to the top of the charts, with the largest readership of any print edition in Israel and a growing online audience in English here in the States.

“We are trying to give a fair and balanced view of the news,” Adelson recently told the Jewish Press. But Hayom is also unabashedly in the corner of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, and everyone in Israel knows it. With its seemingly bottomless resources to hire top talent and a business model that asks nothing of readers other than that they pick it up, the newspaper can out-compete its rivals and distort the media market in one politicized direction.

This isn’t the first time a wealthy Israeli — or someone from the Diaspora, for that matter — has poured money into an Israeli media outlet. Nor is this the first time that a wealthy American Jew has openly supported presidential candidates and elected officials in both the United States and Israel, simultaneously.

The connection that Adelson is drawing is notable not for its existence, but for its order of magnitude. The Democrats that supported President Bill Clinton and Prime Minister Shimon Peres did not have the kind of megaphone that Adelson has to exercise influence in Israel, and did not have a Supreme Court decision allowing them to pour enough money into campaigns at home to shape and even alter the national political narrative.

What’s happening now is quantitatively different than in the past, an outgrowth of the globalization of media and the borderlessness of wealth and power, allowing one fabulously rich individual the opportunity to influence government policy and public opinion at a scale far above anyone else’s. This isn’t some behind-the-scenes maneuver; it’s blatant, transparent, but nonetheless troubling. Would we be comfortable with an American media mogul operating in another, less friendly nation also influencing our presidential campaign? Would this be acceptable if the person wielding such bi-national power didn’t believe he had Israel’s best interests at heart?

There’s a sense that something is fundamentally distorting democratic ideals in both countries. How do the rest of us compete with Sheldon Adelson’s wealth?

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.