Jewish Charities Oppose Salary Cap

Cuomo's Proposed Rule Wouldn't Affect Jewish Groups

By Josh Nathan-Kazis

Published February 09, 2012, issue of February 17, 2012.
  • Print
  • Share Share

New York Jewish charities are lining up against a new rule aimed at curbing executive salaries at not-for-profit organizations that get state funding, even though it likely won’t affect any Jewish groups.

Governor Andrew Cuomo’s order, which would cap at $199,000 the amount of state dollars that could be used for an executive’s salary, would likely not impact most Jewish institutions because they don’t rely exclusively on state cash, experts said.

But New York Jewish charity officials are pushing back anyway, because they question the focus on compensation at charities.

“Excessive compensation paid to a few nonprofit executives, particularly when paid from limited state dollars, represents a waste of resources that could be devoted to program services,” UJA-Federation of New York stated in testimony it submitted to the state Senate along with four major non-Jewish charity umbrella groups opposed to the reforms. “An extensive set of tools… already enables New York State to identify those cases and address them.”

The groups added that they see no evidence that the problem of excessive executive compensation at state-funded not-for-profits is “widespread and persistent.”

Cuomo’s move comes amid a wave of broader efforts at charity reform in New York, where headlines over the past year have disclosed high-profile examples of mismanagement at state-funded not-for-profits.

Supporters and opponents of the current effort agree that it won’t do much to rein in salaries.

The executive order caps at $199,000 the amount of state funds that can be used to compensate an executive at a not-for-profit. The order also requires that three-quarters of state funds given to a not-for-profit be used for operating expenses as opposed to administrative costs.

But the regulations would allow not-for-profits to pay officials out of other revenue streams, such as grants, donations, city or federal funding, and fees for services.

“There are many ways of getting around it,” said William Josephson, former head of the Charities Bureau of the New York State Attorney General’s Office, of the salary cap. “Nevertheless, it’s a positive step.”

Daniel Kurtz, who also once led the Charities Bureau, disagreed.

“I don’t think you have to pay people millions a year, but there is a real marketplace, and this is a clumsy interference with it,” Kurtz said.

In Florida, a similar bill moving through the statehouse, would limit compensation at less than $130,000 for groups that get more than two-thirds of their budget from the state.

Salaries of top professionals at leading Jewish communal institutions can range as high as $700,000, according to an annual survey published by the Forward last December. The highest salary of a New York-based Jewish official included in the Forward’s 2010 survey was that of Jerry Silverman of the Jewish Federations of North America, who earned $625,000.

Silverman and other big Jewish not-for-profit earners in the state, like Steven Schwager of the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and John Ruskay of UJA-Federation of New York, would not be affected by the new limits, as their organizations do not receive state funding.

William Rapfogel of the New York-based Metropolitan Coucil on Jewish Poverty, earned $435,000 in 2009, including benefits and deferred compensation, and his organization took in nearly $100 million in government funding, including contracts with state agencies. But his salary wouldn’t be impacted, either, as he can be paid out of other revenue streams.

Contact Josh Nathan-Kazis at nathankazis@forward.com or on Twitter @joshnathankazis


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.