Europe Must Act in Union To Influence Iran

By Antonio Ferrari

Published December 23, 2005, issue of December 23, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

This week Great Britain, France and Germany resumed talks with Iran over its nuclear program. All eyes are now watching whether the European Union, when it comes to Middle Eastern affairs, can play and not just pay.

For the first time in its short history, the E.U. has a real opportunity to play a crucial political role in the region. This time around, Europe is not acting on behalf of others, but is instead a front-line player whose diplomatic skills will be put to the full test by Iran’s strong determination to pursue a nuclear program.

In the days leading up to the resumption of negotiations this week, Tehran was offering anything but commitment and goodwill. The Islamic Republic’s recently elected president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has been conducting a violent, racist and crazy campaign against Israel. He has made light of the Holocaust, implying that it is just a myth, and he has suggested moving the population of the Jewish state en masse to Europe or North America.

But while the EU3, as the European negotiating team is known, has unequivocally condemned Ahmadinejad’s war of words, it is likely to fight for a compromise solution to Iran’s nuclear program. In exchange for Tehran giving up its quest for nuclear weapons, the E.U. is expected to offer generous aid to help Iran build a strictly controlled nuclear energy program and for social purposes such as medicine and agriculture.

The outlines of a negotiated settlement between the EU3 and Iran are for the most part clear. The real problem for the European negotiators is navigating between the inflexibility of Ahmadinejad and his fellow radicals and the pragmatism of other forces that represent the vast majority of Iranians.

The cost of charting the wrong course has already been made apparent to the E.U., and perhaps to the United States as well, by this past summer’s presidential election in Iran. Not encouraging moderates to vote for the frontrunner against Ahmadinejad, Hashem Rafsanjani — a former president who, while not a moderate in the mold of his successor Mohammed Khatami, is far less radical than the current president — was a costly mistake.

The need to engage the Iranian middle is now clear, which is why the EU3’s efforts are more important than ever. But if they are to make any progress, Great Britain, France and Germany must bring their fellow Europeans into the debate. The EU3 decision to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program was taken not, as the negotiating team’s nickname would suggest, by the whole E.U., but rather only by its three biggest powers.

Iran’s main commercial partner in Europe, Italy, has been left out of the negotiations. With no official place at the table, the loudest voice being heard in Rome is coming from the streets, which needless to say is not where policy is made.

When Ahmedinejad called for Israel to be wiped off the map in late October, the Italian newspaper Il Foglio organized a 10,000-strong pro-Israel demonstration in front of the Iranian embassy in the capital. It was, to be sure, an excellent initiative from a moral point of view, but complicated in political and economic terms. Rome has strategically maintained close business ties with Tehran, but you would never have known it from the media in Great Britain, France and Germany, where headlines were screaming that Italy was against Iran.

The need for the EU3 to be on the same page as the rest of the E.U. cannot be understated, because the other Western players in this nuclear game have limited political room to maneuver. The United States is treading cautiously, partially because opening another front in the Middle East would be quite hard for Washington, and partially because the Shiite majority in Iraq would be unlikely to follow a hard line against their brethren across the border.

The situation is equally delicate for Israel, which has made it absolutely clear that it will never tolerate a nuclear Iran but which is also afraid of creating an explosive situation in the region, particularly if it leads to instability in neighboring Syria. And consideration must also be given to Russia and China, which hold veto power over any United Nations Security Council sanctions against the Islamic Republic and may very well wield it to protect their economic interests in Iran.

In short, right now only the E.U. is capable of defusing a dangerously tense standoff with Iran. The recent stationing of European monitors at the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt — a military team, it is worth noting, that is led by an Italian colonel — has shown that there is an important role for the E.U. to play in maintaining security in the Middle East.

But it remains to be seen whether the European powers are politically mature enough to properly exercise their influence in the ongoing confrontation with Iran. Much depends on whether the EU3 transforms itself into the “EU25,” for only if it acts as a unified power will Europe be able to prove that it can safely swim through the troubled waters of the Middle East.

Antonio Ferrari is senior Middle East correspondent for the Italian daily Corriere della Sera.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.