Yeshiva University's Fiscal Crisis Deepens With No End in Sight

Students and Faculty Reeling From Deep Cuts


By Josh Nathan-Kazis

Published December 20, 2013, issue of December 27, 2013.

(page 2 of 2)

It’s not certain whether the administration’s own review of the 2013 financial results is what drove the latest drastic cuts. But it is clear that something changed in the approach of the Y.U. administration to the school’s economic situation since the late fall.

In addition to reneging on its promise to reinstate slashed retirement contributions, the university said on December 10 that it would sell buildings and cut additional programs. The school also said that Richard Joel, the university’s president, would take a $100,000 pay cut. His salary in 2012 was $855,000.

“The President’s belatedly taking a cut in compensation is a nice gesture, but does not address the systemic problem,” wrote Paris Baldacci, a professor at Y.U.’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and a member of the university’s faculty council, in an email.

Baldacci said that the December 10 announcement had shaken the faculty. “[T]he news is obviously devastating,” Baldacci wrote. “How are faculty and staff to plan their own professional and family lives[?] Promises are made and then broken.”

Others complained that the university had not been forthcoming about the new crisis and the latest round of cuts. Faculty and alumni received letters from Richard Joel on November 20 and December 10, but students were not emailed until December 15.

“It’s disappointing that I had to learn about my school’s fiscal crisis from an alumni email my mother… forwarded me,” wrote Gavriel Brown, editor of Y.U.’s student newspaper, The Commentator, in an email to the Forward. Brown said that he thought the university administration would be more candid with students in the future, and that he hoped a top administrator who recently met with faculty would hold a similar meeting with students.

The S&P report is the second of two recent downgrades of Y.U. debt by credit rating agencies. The first, by Moody’s in October, dropped Y.U. to that agency’s second-lowest investment grade.

In its December report, S&P faulted Y.U. for relying heavily on short-term loans to pay its operating expenses. Financially healthy institutions generally use such lines of credit sparingly, repaying the loans immediately; Y.U. is increasingly using such borrowing to finance its everyday operations.

According to S&P, Y.U. had a $48.7 million outstanding balance on its line of credit at the end of the 2012 fiscal year. That was up to $75 million at the end of its 2013 fiscal year.

“We believe that the university’s inability to manage working capital cash flow is a credit weakness,” the S&P report stated.

In addition to cash flow problems, the report pointed to problems in oversight. According to S&P, Y.U. currently has no enterprise resource planning system — a computerized accounting platform in use at most universities that allows departments to update budgets in real time.

“They do not have a live system today that allows them to do that,” said Charlene Butterfield, a director at S&P in the higher education group. “What is typical at most peer institutions is that they have been operating under those systems for quite a while, because these are modern tools.”

Y.U. plans to implement such a system in the next two years. The school replaced its chief financial officer in November 2013.

Contact Josh Nathan-Kazis at nathankazis@forward.com or on Twitter @joshnathankazis



Would you like to receive updates about new stories?






















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.