Jacob’s Finale

Genesis 47:28–50:26

By Deidre Levinson

Published January 13, 2006, issue of January 13, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

This final portion of Genesis is chiefly concerned with Jacob’s preparations for his approaching death. These occupy three successive scenes. In the first he has Joseph, in private, swear to bury him, not in Egypt where he will die, but in the burial place of his fathers in Canaan. In the second, again in private audience with Joseph, he adopts Joseph’s sons and blesses them. Lastly, blessing his own sons in their capacity as heads of the 12 tribes of Israel, he charges them with his dying breath to bury him with his fathers in (now specifying the exact location) the cave of Machpelah, in the field that Abraham had purchased as an inalienable possession in the land of Canaan: “There they buried Abraham and Sarah his wife; there they buried Isaac and Rebekah his wife; and there I buried Leah.” But there he did not bury Rachel. It is the senior wife, the unloved one, whom he will lie beside in Machpelah. Addressing all his sons together, speaking publicly on this occasion, he makes no mention of Rachel. But earlier, in the midst of his elaborate preliminaries to blessing Joseph’s sons, he comes out with it, his unassuaged grief for her surfacing in a momentary utterance from his heart’s blood: “As for me, when I came from Padan, Rachel died by me in the land of Canaan in the way… and I buried her there in the way of Ephrath.” Jacob has introduced his proceedings in this scene by reciting God’s promise to him at Luz. All his doings with Joseph’s sons — the adoption, the blessing, the prophecy — come under this heading. So, too, although in this case involuntarily, does his evocation of Rachel’s death — when she died, where she died, where he buried her. She died as they crossed into Canaan, on the road south from Luz. No sooner had he set up a pillar to consecrate the place where God had renewed his covenant with him than he was setting up a second pillar to mark Rachel’s grave. Evidently, the two events are intimately connected in Jacob’s unconscious.

That aside, his mind is totally occupied with the urgent business at hand.

Hearing that Joseph is coming, the old patriarch, mortally ill as he is, “strengthened himself and sat up in the bed,” all set to fulfill his well-laid plan for the benefit of his abiding favorite. Accordingly, he proceeds to adopt Joseph’s sons as his own (“Ephraim and Manasseh…are mine; as Reuben and Simeon, they shall be mine”), for this is his means to doubling Joseph’s due portion of the inheritance, thus bestowing upon him the right of the firstborn. Thus, too, he emphatically affirms the conspicuous preference he had shown for Joseph in his childhood. The evil consequences of his loving this son “more than all his brethren” remain concealed from him till his death.

Quite otherwise in his blessing of Joseph’s sons, his mindfulness of himself as a man redeemed from an earlier and greater evil of his past is crucial to his sacred function here as God’s prophet. Back to beginnings, to the young Jacob, the favorite of his mother, who — looking to expedite the fulfillment of the prophecy made known to her while the twins were yet in the womb — prompted him, her ready accomplice, to usurp Esau’s title to the blessing of the firstborn. Twenty years on, another blessing, this one the redemptive blessing wrung out of the anonymous adversary he wrestled with, face to face, unceasingly, all that night before he went, limping, to meet Esau. Now, here is Jacob, blind in his old age as Isaac was, blessing the younger son as the elder as Isaac did. But the likeness stops there. Isaac, distracted by the conflicting evidence of his senses (the outward sign of his inward ambivalence), blessed his younger son as the elder unwittingly. Jacob, in sharp contrast, “guiding his hands wittingly,” reverses the order of seniority of Joseph’s sons in full knowledge of what he is doing and in absolute certainty of its rightness. It is as God’s prophet, the conscious instrument of God’s sublimely ironic will, that Jacob, who had attached so much and such undue importance to the prescriptive right of the firstborn, now unhesitatingly enacts its reversal. To the uncomprehending Joseph, thinking to have his boys blessed according to rule, this looks like a dangerous error. Exasperated, he attempts to uncross the wayward hands: “Not so, my father, for this is the firstborn; put thy right hand upon his head.” But this is no error. Jacob, his intractable right hand on Ephraim’s head, only asseverates what he has already stated: “I know it, my son, I know it…he also shall be great; but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he.” The blind seer indeed knows whereof he speaks. The tribal history of Israel testifies to it.

Deidre Levinson is a teacher and writer who lives in New York City.

Find us on Facebook!
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.