Pull Back the Curtain — and Let J Street In


j street

Published April 29, 2014.
  • Print
  • Share Share

If you want to know why ordinary American Jews, especially younger ones, are turning away from the communal establishment — not out of anger but out of disinterest or, perhaps, disgust — then look no further than the convoluted argument over whether J Street should be a member of the Conference of Presidents.

J Street: Calls itself the “pro-Israel, pro-peace” lobby. Generally backs the Obama administration. Challenges the Netanyahu government frequently. Experiencing huge growth since it began five years ago.

Conference of Presidents: Officially, the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, but its 51 members include a lot of minor groups as well. Established in 1956 to present a more unified Jewish voice on Israel to the White House and beyond. Bills itself now as the umbrella group for all “pro-Israel” activities, from left to right.

So a reasonable outsider may ask: What’s the problem? J Street’s politics are to the left, but no more than other groups already in the Conference. (See: Americans for Peace Now.) The dovish lobby, now five years old, fulfills the official membership requirements — which, it appears, not all the 51 members do. With 180,000 supporters in nearly 40 chapters nationwide, along with another 50 chapters on college campuses, J Street is way larger than many of the Conference’s other members. (See: B’nai Zion Foundation, MERCAZ USA, and more.)

But this argument is not on the merits. That’s the first problem. The second is that it is conducted largely in secret. Only because of the dogged reporting of journalists like our Nathan Guttman do we even have a glimpse of what has gone on behind closed doors in these deliberations, which may — or may not — culminate in a vote tomorrow night.

The absence of transparency leads inevitably to the perception that a handful of people are deciding which organizations get to call themselves “pro-Israel” and then purport to speak for everyone. But they don’t. They can’t.

We would have liked to put these issues directly to Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice chair of the Conference since 1986. But as has been his custom for the last five years, he refused to return our phone call.

The legitimate case against granting J Street membership is that it has a related PAC, a separate organization that channels money to political candidates, something other Conference members do not do. But you get the sense that’s not what has so deeply bothered its opponents.

Rather, it’s the way that J Street’s President, Jeremy Ben-Ami, has disagreed with and sometimes challenged the Netanyahu government, and therefore supposedly giving succor to those who wish to harm or delegitimize Israel.

But to declare that the reason for exclusion is simply hypocritical. The Zionist Organization of America has vehemently disagreed with Israeli leaders in the past, and it’s a member in good standing. As it should be. The Conference should represent all legitimate points of view, no matter who is in power in Jerusalem.

As of this writing, it’s not clear whether there will actually be a vote tomorrow – the rules are complicated – or whether J Street’s fate will be decided via a secret mail ballot over the following ten days. Two-thirds of the current members, totaling 34, must vote in favor.

J Street supporters privately say that a mail ballot will help their cause, presuming that some Conference members would rather not publicize their votes. Nonetheless, such secrecy harms the larger cause of transparency and trust in Jewish leadership.

Some Conference members have openly declared that they support J Street’s membership. We think all 51 should do so. However they vote, they should be willing to defend it to the Jews they claim to represent.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.