Bush Administration Vows To Boycott Hamas Militants Elected in Territories

Diplomat: Group Must Disarm

By Ori Nir

Published May 13, 2005, issue of May 13, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration “will neither recognize nor engage with” members of Hamas or Hezbollah who are elected to office unless the two militant groups disarm, a top American diplomat told the Forward.

David Satterfield, the second-ranking official at the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, said that the Bush administration is not attempting to block the groups from participating in Palestinian or Lebanese elections. But, he added, the Bush administration would only recognize armed militant groups “if they lay down their arms.”

Satterfield’s comments, which appeared to overturn several earlier remarks from the American brass, come as Hamas and Hezbollah officials are vowing to hold on to their weapons.

With Hamas expected to win a significant share of the vote in July’s Palestinian legislative elections, the policy outlined by Satterfield could leave the White House in the position of boycotting top officials in the Palestinian Authority at a time when the Bush administration is trying to advance the peace process. The issue also could drive a deeper wedge between Washington and Europe, where some governments have indicated a willingness to deal with militants who take part in democratic elections.

Critics argue that the Bush administration has failed to wrestle with the possibility that a push by the United States for elections in the Middle East could produce victories for radical Islamic groups that refuse to give up their weapons.

The “Bush administration rarely focuses on that,” said Martin Indyk, who served as President Clinton’s chief Middle East adviser. Indyk, now the head of the Washington-based Saban Center for Middle East Policy, added that the White House “has the tendency to put these kind of issues in the ‘too-hard’ basket.”

Wanting the White House to press Arab countries on the issue, Indyk said that he could find only one example of an American official even stating that armed groups should not take part in the political process: President Bush’s April 19 interview with the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation.

“You can’t have a free country if a group of people are like an armed militia,” Bush said, adding, “citizens’ groups that are armed, trying to impose their will on a free society, is just not the definition of a free society.”

However, in recent weeks, White House spokesman Scott McClellan and J. Scott Carpenter, deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor, have sounded a different note.

“The one thing that you see when people have elections that are free and fair is that they tend to choose people who are committed to improving their livelihood, not people who are committed to terrorist acts,” McClellan said during his April 13 daily briefing when asked how the United States would respond to a Hamas victory in next July’s Palestinian elections. “And I think if you look back at the previous Palestinian elections, the people that were elected, while they might have been members of Hamas, they were business professionals. They were people that ran on talking about improving the quality of life for the Palestinian people and addressing their economic needs and addressing other needs that are important to them — not terrorists.”

Carpenter made a similar remark last month at a conference in Qatar on American-Islamic relations. According to notes taken by several reporters who attended the conference, Carpenter said that America was “prepared to accept the implications” of allowing radical groups to participate in elections. He added, “I won’t go into Hamas and Hezbollah — people in the region themselves will have to ask” whether they are willing to support “people who in their underlying ideology are against democracy itself.”

Some observers were surprised that Carpenter did not articulate a clear American position rejecting the participation in the political process of inherently anti-democratic forces.

In his remarks to the Forward, Satterfield said that electing people who are affiliated with militant groups is the internal business of the Lebanese and the Palestinians. “But the continued involvement of such groups in terrorism is very much our business,” said Satterfield, who spoke to the Forward after participating in a panel discussion at the annual Washington conference of the American Jewish Committee.

Noting that some governments in Europe are willing to overlook the terrorist actions of such groups as they transform into political parties, Satterfield said that “there should be no place for any blessing” of these groups as long as they engage in terrorism.

Hamas officials are insisting that violence against Israel is a legitimate option as long as Israel maintains a presence in the West Bank and Gaza. Senior Hezbollah official Naim Kassem said last week that the organization intends to maintain its weapons “to defend [Lebanon] from the Israeli danger.”

Hamas is performing strongly in the Palestinian municipal elections, which have taken place in phases during the past two months. Last week, Hamas won a majority in elections to the city council of Qalqilya, an important town in the West Bank, and to large municipal councils in Gaza.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.