Hecklers Nabbed VIP Seating With Help of (Former) Friend

By Forward Staff; With Reporting by Marc Perelman, Ami Eden, Jennifer Siegel, E.B. Solomont and Jta.

Published May 27, 2005, issue of May 27, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

After Prime Minister Sharon was interrupted by a handful of hecklers Sunday during a speech in New York, one of his high-profile hosts felt the need to apologize.

“The noisy minority does not reflect the view of the vast majority,” said host James Tisch, chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

True, but it helps to have connections. Two of the hecklers — David and Syndi Romanoff, a married couple from Elizabeth, N.J. — had been waved into the VIP seats at the rally, giving them better access to the prime minister, by Tisch’s chief lieutenant, Malcolm Hoenlein.

Hoenlein, who has headed the Presidents Conference for 19 years, has often found himself fending off claims from critics who say he uses the relative lack of process within the loose but influential coalition to steer it to the right.

In this case, however, Hoenlein insisted it was all a misunderstanding. He said that when he vouched for the Romanoffs at the rally, he simply was helping out two familiar faces in search of better seats.

“You would be out of your mind to think that I allowed them in knowing what they would do,” Hoenlein told the Forward. He added that the Romanoffs, who are prominent figures in the Orthodox community in Elizabeth, “took advantage of the hospitality of the organizers. Their behavior is despicable and so counterproductive.”

David Romanoff defended his actions in an interview, but he said that there had been no reason for Hoenlein to know what was going to happen.

At the same time, Romanoff acknowledged that he had taken a public role in anti-disengagement activities in the past, at one point traveling all the way to Crawford, Texas, to protest the plan.

Hoenlein noted that in the end the 1,000-person crowd included just five or so protesters: “Not a bad filtering effort on the whole, I would say.” Other observers estimated seven to 10 hecklers, in three separate groups.

The event was Sharon’s first visit in four years to New York, the metropolitan area with the largest concentration of Jews in the world. It was his first major meeting with Jewish communal leaders here since he announced his Gaza withdrawal plan. The rally, held in Manhattan at Baruch College, was sponsored by a coalition of local and national Jewish organizations, including the Presidents Conference, United Jewish Communities and UJA-Federation of New York.

During his talk, Sharon won repeated cheers from the religiously diverse crowd as he defended his withdrawal plan. Leaders of the Reform, Conservative and Orthodox movements offered prayers of support for the plan.

The mood was exactly the opposite outside the auditorium, where the plan was rallied against by a mostly Orthodox crowd, in particular Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidim. The protest appeared to get off to a sluggish start, but picked up steam after the arrival of about 10 busloads of Lubavitch Hasidim from Brooklyn. Organizers said that several thousand people attended, but the New York City Police Department declined to give an estimate. Several news organizations gave estimates of 500 to 1,000.

Several groups that oppose the disengagement plan, including Americans for a Safe Israel and the Zionist Organization of America, organized Sunday’s protest.

The makeup of the crowd seemed to echo a string of Israeli news reports in recent months describing the growing role of Chabad-Lubavitch, particularly its so-called messianic wing, in organizing and funding anti-disengagement activities. The messianic wing of Lubavitch is a faction that believes its late rabbi, Menachem Schneerson, who died in 1994, is still alive and will return as the messiah.

Many of the demonstrators wore orange, the color adopted by Gaza anti-disengagement activists. They chanted, “Not one inch. Shame on you.” One sign compared Sharon’s plan to the Nazis reign and to the Spanish Inquisition. It read: “Spain 1492, Germany 1933, Israel 2005.” Another sign declared, “Gush Katif is Not Anatevka!” invoking the fictional Jewish shtetl driven into exile in the Sholom Aleichem-inspired musical, “Fiddler on the Roof.”

Among the speakers at the rally was Dov Hikind, a New York State Assembly member who represents the heavily Orthodox Boro Park section of Brooklyn.

David Romanoff said that after being ejected from the speech inside, he and his wife addressed the demonstration. Other ejected hecklers reportedly also addressed the rally.

Speaking afterward, Romanoff told the Forward that he had not gone to the event with the intention of disrupting Sharon’s speech. But, Romanoff added, another audience member who stood up, showed his orange shirt and declared, “Jews do not deport Jews,” was his inspiration.

After that, Romanoff said, “I could not help myself.”

Romanoff said that he had not heard from Hoenlein.

“I respect him,” Romanoff said. “I wish that it had not been such one-sided event. The other side should have been represented.”

Hoenlein was not as diplomatic. “I will not talk to the couple, but they will hear from me,” he said.

Hoenlein told the Forward that he had personally instructed security personnel to search everyone heading into the event, and to be on the lookout for people wearing orange shirts under their jackets.

Romanoff confirmed that his wife was wearing an orange shirt under her top when the couple stood up to challenge Sharon, but he did not confirm witnesses’ claims that she revealed it by removing an outer garment during the commotion.

This is not the first time Romanoff has publicly proved his bona fides as a critic of the Gaza pullout plan. In April, according to a report in New Jersey Jewish News, he traveled to Crawford, Texas, to take part in an anti-disengagement rally as Sharon met with President Bush at the American leader’s ranch.

Hoenlein said he was completely shocked by the Romanoffs’ behavior during the Sharon speech Sunday.

“I had no idea they could act in such a way. They never did such things before,” Hoenlein said. “I spoke at a dinner for them in Elizabeth, New Jersey.”

The Presidents Conference had come under fire last year from some of its members, most vocally by the Anti-Defamation League, for failing to issue a clear statement of support for Sharon after he announced his plan to withdraw from Gaza and the northern West Bank.

But even ADL National Director Abraham Foxman, one of Hoenlein’s main critics, said it was unfair to blame him for the disruption at Sunday’s rally.

“People use any means to get into those kind of events,” Foxman said. “I know people who disagree with the prime minister, and I assume they would behave, but you never know. So I don’t see this as a big deal.”

Foxman has led calls for the Presidents Conference to be out front in rallying support for Sharon and his plan. The conference has endorsed the plan, but in apparent deference to its hawkish minority, its most public pronouncements — including the Sunday rally and an advertisement in The New York Times — have been framed more generally as support for Sharon.

At the rally, however, Tisch pledged that the Conference of Presidents would work “to build even greater understanding for the disengagement plan” with a Web site and by submitting editorials to newspapers.

Find us on Facebook!
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.