California Dem Pushes for Marriage Bill

By Josh Richman

Published June 17, 2005, issue of June 17, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

SAN FRANCISCO — The clock was running down and California Assemblyman Mark Leno was a few votes short, watching his same-sex marriage bill slide toward oblivion.

For the second year in a row, Leno, a Jewish Democrat from San Francisco and one of the state legislature’s six openly gay lawmakers, was racing to beat the June 2 deadline for passing bills in either house of the California legislature. In May 2004 he ended up pulling a similar bill from consideration when he saw he didn’t have the 41 assembly votes needed for it to pass. He was expecting better success this year with his new version, the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act. But Democratic abstentions and defections on June 1 left Leno a few votes short, forcing him to request an 11th-hour reconsideration. He spent the next day feverishly trying to persuade his own side of the aisle that California is ready for same-sex marriage.

In his last ditch-effort, Leno, 53, brought every personal resource to bear: the Midwestern charm of his Wisconsin childhood; insights from the psychology B.A. he earned at American College in Jerusalem, where he graduated valedictorian; the spiritual earnestness of a former Reform rabbinical student, and the tirelessness he displayed as an activist with many community organizations, including the American Jewish Congress.

None of it was enough: Despite the Democrats’ 48-to-32 majority in the assembly, Leno could not find the extra votes before the deadline passed June 2.

Still, the lawmaker is vowing to keep up the fight.

“What we’re fighting for here is simple human dignity, and I will argue for that with my last breath,” Leno told the Forward several days after the defeat of his bill.

The defeat of Leno’s bill comes as supporters and opponents already are preparing for what’s sure to be an epic and costly battle over a 2006 ballot measure calling for a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. The amendment would effectively overrule the kind of law that Leno seeks to pass, and would render moot a lawsuit — now before a state appeals court — challenging the constitutionality of state’s existing statutory ban.

Similar amendments were passed by voters in 13 states last year and one more state this year. But Leno and other liberals believe that California voters will reject such a measure, if lawmakers approve same-sex marriage by the time of the ballot.

If a bill like Leno’s stands a chance anywhere in the nation, it probably should be in California, with its solid Democratic majority and long history of gay-rights milestones. Yet it’s not that simple: Same-sex marriage opponents have spent money and lobbied hard against the bill, especially in the legislature’s significant Latino caucus, where largely Democratic politics meet conservative, largely Catholic social values.

One Latino assemblyman, Alberto Torrico, a civil rights lawyer from a relatively liberal district, cited his born-again Christian beliefs when he decided to abstain from the June 1 vote. However, he reversed himself the next day, weeping as he embraced state Senator Carole Migden, a Jewish lesbian from San Francisco. But 10 other Democrats — including six Latinos — abstained or joined Republicans who voted against it on a party line.

Following the latest defeat, Leno said, he and his allies might try to revive the effort by shifting their attention to the state senate, where Democrats hold 25 of 40 seats. “I just think we are so very, very close,” he said.

Leno, who lost his partner of 10 years to AIDS in 1990, said he was inspired by hundreds of stories of longtime couples and their children being treated like second-class citizens and by “the ineffable joy that was experienced at San Francisco City Hall last year” as he and other officials performed thousands of same-sex marriages in defiance of state law. The marriages, later deemed void by the state Supreme Court, began on the same day that Leno had introduced the first of his two marriage bills.

Referring to his intention to continue fighting, he said, “I know I cannot stop.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.