A Century of Israeli Art, on View in Berlin

Art

By Michael Levitin

Published June 17, 2005, issue of June 17, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Pogroms in Russia before and during the First World War sent waves of Jewish emigrants fleeing to Palestine. Around the same time, Jewish painters from across Europe settled in Tel Aviv, where an arts scene flourished in the 1920s, planting the seeds of Jewish national identity. It is this compelling chapter that opens “The New Hebrews: A Century of Art in Israel,” a context-heavy exhibition running through September at Berlin’s Martin-Gropius-Bau museum. Sprawling in scope, the show examines political, historical and ideological forces that have shaped Israeli art over the past century.

“Jewish art is not something you can put your finger on,” said Doreet LeVitte Harten, the show’s curator, who explained that people around the world misunderstand and misrepresent Israel. Her show, she said, aims to “tell a more fragmented story,” exposing the public to modern Israeli art while debunking religious, militarist and other stereotypes about the country.

But why Berlin? In fact, the importance of “The New Hebrews” appearing in Germany, where the memory of Jews and the Holocaust runs deep and at a time of intense European criticism of Israel’s policies, cannot be understated. According to LeVitte Harten, when Germans come to see this exhibition of Israeli art — which was timed to coincide with and commemorate the 40th anniversary of German-Israeli diplomatic relations — they discover that they know very little about Israel. And not just about its art, but also about its history. “Here, people aren’t aware of the things they are about to see,” she said. “Israel is unfamiliar to them. Jewishness is a fascination, an other.”

‘The New Hebrews” begins with earthy pastel drawings by Abel Pann (born Abba Pfefferman, 1883, in Vitebsk, Belorussia), depicting Jewish massacres, funerals and marches into exile during the Russian pogroms of the early 20th century. On the opposite walls, grotesque photographs of Jews slaughtered from Bialystok to Odessa, and an enormous, inferno-like oil painting by Shmuel Hirszenberg, called “The Wandering Jew,” set an apocalyptic — and victimized — tone.

More pleasing to the senses are the expressionist, cubist and naively influenced paintings by Jewish emigrants trained in Europe and awed by the freshness of an Arab Mediterranean landscape. Works by Romanian-born Reuven Rubin stand out for their boldness in colors and smooth, spatial balance. Set against a warm desert background, Rubin’s figures at times resemble the hunched tan

bodies of Diego Rivera; at other times, the long and haunted faces of Modigliani. His triptych, “First Fruits” (1923), shows Bedouin Arabs and Israelis harvesting crops together, while a portrait, “Sophie, Bukharin Jewess,” depicts a pale, full-breasted woman with large eyes and jet-black hair holding a flower pot in her hand, symbolizing fecundity, exotic beauty and — or at least it seems — the aspirations of a Jewish national identity just coming into being.

Some artists worked explicitly to promote that identity — like Ephraim Moses Lilien, a chief designer and illustrator for the Zionist movement, and Boris Schatz, the Lithuanian-born sculptor who founded Israel’s Bezalel Academy of Art and Design in 1906. But the painters who chose nature and the rich colors and characters of daily life as their subjects produced the most lasting works. One example is Russian-born Arieh El-Hanani, whose charming expressionist watercolors depict the café and port life in Tel Aviv that Arabs and Jews inhabit side by side. While Pinchas Litvinowsky captures then-Palestine’s vibrant desert landscape, the strong, crafted oil canvasses by Nahum Gutman celebrate a rugged farming world of fruit fields and olive groves, which are tended mostly by Palestinian workers. The Arab population served as models for Jewish artists all through the 1920s until Arab attacks in 1929 led to 130 Jewish deaths, abruptly ending the era of peaceful co-habitation.

“The New Hebrews” moves quickly through the 1930s, a period of increasing Jewish economic strength that climaxed in the Levant Fair, which lured commerce and more than 600,000 visitors to Palestine from 1934 to ’36. In the 1940s, popular art emerged in the forms of photographs, portraits and posters reflecting a new identity of “muscle Judaism,” which transformed the passive, physically weak Jew from Europe’s shtetl days into a strapping, can-do pioneer living in harmony with his surroundings. New Hebrews who yearned to “shed the rags of exile and to wear the garment of home” kept their sleeves rolled and carried spades, shovels and scythes. Nowhere was the Jews’ romance with the land more proudly idealized than in Hungarian-born Zoltan Kluger’s black-and-white photographs portraying robust life on the kibbutz.

Sionah Tagger’s portrait of Avraham Shlonsky, the first modern poet in the Hebrew language, connects a face to the era of confidence and optimism that Jews felt about the utopian world they were building in Palestine. Shlonsky, with his enormous head of hair, luminous green eyes and melancholic expression, embodies an archetypal Jew, brilliantly creative, who has emerged from the West in successive generations — from Leon Trotsky to Albert Einstein to Bob Dylan.

The exhibition devotes a large space to architectural models, showing influences that Bauhaus and other European avant-garde movements had on Israeli building — from Richard Kaufmann’s modernism to Leopold Krakauer’s functionalism and the expressionist buildings of Erich Mendelsohn. The show also sneaks in a rare artifact linking Israel’s past with its present: the Temple Scroll, a 3-meter segment of parchment dating from 120 BCE that Bedouins discovered in 1947 in a cave on the northwestern shore of the Dead Sea. The scroll, which is partly burnt, decayed and rounded on the edges — but on which the Hebraic writing is still clearly visible — serves as a connector between ancient and modern Israel that viewers here rarely get a chance to see and feel.

But the further the show moves into contemporary times — beginning with the Holocaust and continuing through works completed this year — the more it abandons art and relies on weighty texts and a hodgepodge of installations, videos, childlike drawings, maps and contemporary (too often kitschy) experimental canvasses to describe abstract chapters such as “Religion,” “Homeland,” “War” and “Conflicts.” Photographs ranging from crowded bus stops, clothes hanging out to dry in an Orthodox neighborhood, shot-up military jeeps and a soldier with yarmulke on his head but otherwise half-naked in a sexual pose make it easy to feel misled about what the exhibition promised versus what it delivered.

That’s not to say that the show makes no attempt at presenting genuine art from (often young) Israeli artists in the second half of the century. Ori Reisman’s large, semiabstract canvases; 29-year-old Nir Hod’s sorrowful adolescent soldiers attending a funeral in the wall-sized portrait “Lost Youth” (2004-5), and Avner Ben Gal’s brooding, barren five-painting cycle of acrylics called “The Eve of Destruction” (2000-01) attest to a strong artistic tradition continuing today in Israel.

A strong point of the exhibit is that it pushes an identity of Israel forward — not only by examining the country’s past but also by looking toward its future. However, in the leap from the painters of the 1920s to those born after 1965, it’s hard not to feel an absence of art from the century’s middle decades. Did the Holocaust, wars with Arab countries and ongoing political crises subsume the arts in Israel or devastate them, and how? Or are we simply not getting a full picture of modern Israeli art — if a full picture after 100 years is even possible? “The New Hebrews” offers little in the way of an answer, giving a lethal dose of graphic and installation projects while leaving a gaping hole where a half-century of fine art should be.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.