Don’t Play Politics With Antisemitism

By Sam Gejdenson

Published October 13, 2006, issue of October 13, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Heading into the home stretch of another bitterly fought national election, partisans on both sides aren’t pulling any punches. Democrats charge Republicans with incompetence, corruption and failed leadership. Republicans call Democrats ready to cut and run on Iraq, weak on security and, of course, tax-and-spend liberals.

Name-calling and partisan attacks may turn the public off of politics and politicians, but they are a part of the political game and unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

There are, however, lines that shouldn’t be crossed even in the heat of partisan battle. One such red line is using charges of antisemitism for political purposes.

In recent years, Republicans have tried to scare Jewish voters with charges that Democrats are insufficiently supportive of Israel. My former congressional colleague Howard Berman addressed that charge on this page two weeks ago.

Now, however, they’ve upped the ante, seeking to paint the more progressive elements of the Democratic Party as more maliciously antisemitic.

Antisemitism remains a real danger in the 21st century. Readers of this paper scarcely need to be reminded of the death, suffering and destruction that hatred of the Jewish people has caused. My own family and that of many American Jews suffered its effects in Europe and elsewhere, within our own lifetimes. The wounds are fresh and the ongoing examples of it today all too real.

Recognizing this stark reality, we must condemn and fight antisemitism whenever and wherever it rears its ugly head — as well as the antisemites themselves, whether they come from the left or from the right. Our experience as a people obligates us to fight xenophobia, homophobia and all forms of discrimination and to rally the forces of freedom and tolerance to that fight.

The ability to do that, however, is severely damaged when the antisemitism charge is tossed around lightly and for political purpose. Crying wolf about antisemitism demeans the charge and makes it more likely that, when faced with the real thing, the victims will not be able to generate necessary attention and concern.

Over the past two months, conservative media commentators have undertaken a concerted attack on MoveOn.org, the progressive online movement, charging, as the Washington Times did in an editorial, that the organization has “a Jewish problem.” William Kristol in the pages of the Wall Street Journal and the Weekly Standard, Robert Goldberg in the Washington Times and others have taken shots at the organization as part of the global rising tide of antisemitism. Their obvious political aim is to move Jewish voters in this tight election season to the Republican column.

To back their claims up, they point to antisemitic posts on the organization’s electronic bulletin boards to say that the entire organization — and by implication, the Democratic Party — are antisemitic.

It matters not a whit to those making the charges that these bulletin boards are open to the public, or that the posts were not put up by MoveOn members. Neither do they care that the organization immediately took down those posts and issued a strong statement condemning them.

It matters not that cyberspace is rife with crackpots and extremists of all stripes and politics from right-wing skinheads to left-wing anarchists — all free to post their ranting and raving on anyone’s Web site that invites public comment, as does MoveOn’s. It matters not that many of MoveOn’s leaders, staff and consultants are Jewish, and even have family living in Israel.

The opportunity to charge antisemitism against the organization, and more broadly against the left, was simply too tempting in this political season.

Such use of antisemitism for blatant political purposes should have no place in the American political dialogue. A growing cloud of global antisemitism hangs over our community and our brothers and sisters around the world. Rather than disappearing with progress and modernity, the phenomenon is once again on the rise. The reasons why can be left to debate another day.

Whatever our political allegiances, the Jewish community should unite in condemning any effort by any side to demean and diminish the evil that is antisemitism by brandishing the charge for political purposes.

We face enough real dangers and challenges in the world to which we need to focus our national and communal attention. We don’t need William Kristol, the Washington Times and other conservative media voices to invent dangers and enemies that don’t exist.

Sam Gejdenson, a Connecticut Democrat, served in the House of Representatives from 1980 to 2000, retiring as the ranking Democrat on the International Relations Committee.






Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.