Groups Launch Advocacy Effort To Head Off U.N. Vote on Fence

By Marc Perelman

Published July 16, 2004, issue of July 16, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Israel and Its American Supporters are Waging a Major Advocacy Campaign to Thwart Palestinian Efforts to Have the Security Council Act on the International Court of Justice’s Ruling Against the West Bank Security Fence.

The immediate goal of the campaign is to secure a high number of abstentions at the General Assembly, where the Arab Group is expected to introduce a resolution on Friday calling on Israel and all members states to comply with the court’s 14-to-1 decision, according to a copy of the draft resolution obtained by the Forward. The resolution is expected to be adopted. But the main objective of Israel and Jewish groups is to ensure that no majority emerges in favor of a similar resolution at the Security Council, which is the only U.N. body with enforcement authority. Any anti-Israel resolution regarding the fence would in all likelihood prompt an American veto, further damaging Washington’s relations with the Arab and Muslim worlds.

To help head off the need for a U.S. veto at the 15-member council, where nine votes are required to pass a resolution, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Jewish community’s main pro-Israel umbrella group, has launched what is being described as its “biggest mobilization” on a U.N. issue since the failed effort to defeat the 1975 resolution equating Zionism with racism. Leaders of the Conference of Presidents are urging the group’s 52-member organization to reach out to ambassadors and foreign capitals across the globe. Meanwhile, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Dan Gillerman, is planning to meet this week with several colleagues from other countries to convey Jerusalem’s argument that only negotiations on the ground will yield significant progress, an Israeli official said.

“The Palestinians want to make the ruling a binding decision and would like to put sanctions in place,” said Amy Goldstein, U.N. director of B’nai B’rith International. “If they achieve this, this is no less than a redux of the Arab boycott of Israel.”

Israeli officials and Jewish groups are focusing much of their lobbying efforts on the European Union, which has two veto-wielding, permanent Security Council members in France and Great Britain, as well as an influential nonpermanent member in Germany. All three countries have previously said the court should not be used to rule on what is essentially a political dispute. The issue was on the agenda of a monthly meeting of E.U. Foreign Ministers this week in Brussels.

The proposed resolution being circulated by the Palestinians leaves open the possibility of imposing sanctions on Israel, while insisting “the United Nations, and especially the General Assembly and the Security Council, should consider what further action is required to bring to an end the illegal situation resulting from the construction of the Wall.”

Palestinian officials have vowed to use the international court’s nonbinding advisory opinion on the fence to stigmatize Israeli policies. However, Nasser Al-Kidwa, the Palestinian U.N. observer, told reporters on Monday that the Palestinian Authority would wait before taking its case to the Security Council. He declined to say whether he would push for sanctions against Israel, a move that could antagonize countries sitting on the fence. A spokesman representing European Union Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana was quoted as saying that the E.U. did not favor such an approach to addressing the fence and the world court’s ruling.

Observers say the Palestinians could bring up the fence decision during the annual meeting of the General Assembly in September, when the presence of heads of states and foreign ministers attracts more media attention than the traditionally quiet summer at the United Nations.

In its opinion, issued July 9, the court ruled that the construction of the “wall” in the Palestinian territories was illegal and should stop immediately, and that Israel should make reparations. The opinion asks “all states not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from construction of the wall and not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction.”

Officials at Jewish organizations criticized the ruling’s failure to take into account the “root causes” for the wall: Palestinian terrorist attacks. Jewish organizational leaders also said that the judges went out of their way to rule against Israel on details on which the court was not even asked to rule.

“It’s just terrible. The court overreached, and this gives a lot of heart to those who think the U.N. is no good to begin with,” said one Jewish official.

In Israel, officials were vowing to ignore the ruling. Despite the defiant comments, the Israeli Defense Ministry reportedly has decided to redraw the fence’s route so that it will more closely follow the Green Line, the pre-1967 border dividing Israel and the West Bank.

A June 30 ruling the Israeli High Court ordered that a smaller, 30-kilometer section of the proposed route be changed. The Israeli court ruled that Israel had a right to build a barrier in the West Bank on security grounds but ordered one segment rerouted to avoid cutting off Palestinian villagers from farms, jobs, public services and cities.






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.