Painterly and Scholarly: Archie Rand Satisfies Purists of All Kinds

By David Grosz

Published July 16, 2004, issue of July 16, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Archie Rand’s challenging, hybrid artwork has long been difficult to categorize. As a progressive painter who frequently incorporates Jewish themes and sacred texts into his canvases, Rand has faced criticism from purists in both the religious and avant-garde communities. His work, however, is probably best understood as a series of paintings that consistently make use of the written word. In addition to more than 80 solo exhibitions, he has collaborated frequently with such writers as John Ashbery, Robert Creeley and John Yau.

The lone shortcoming of “Archie Rand: Iconoclast,” a delightful exhibition of the artist’s religious paintings at the Yeshiva University Museum’s art gallery, is its failure to place adequately Rand’s explicitly Jewish work within the larger context of his entire career. But this hardly should discourage a visit. The museum has assembled way more than 100 paintings, all but two of which belong to one of seven series. Each is grouped around a specific text, which ranges from the Bible to a Yehuda Amichai poem. Almost every image is painterly and scholarly enough to satisfy critics in both camps. But the show’s real revelation is that Rand is a deeply sensitive reader of Jewish texts.

For each series, Rand has created a unique visual language. Both “Nachmanides’ Letter to His Son” (1993) (33 images based on a letter of moral instruction from the Ramban to his son) and “Psalm 68” (1994) (36 paintings, each a single verse of the Psalm) comprise small, abstract works that capture the intimate, private nature of the texts. Yet the two sequences also manage to reflect the distinct personalities of their respective authors. The Ramban’s abstract language is subtle, symbolic and intellectual, while David’s is colorful, earthy and expressive.

In “Sixty Paintings From the Bible” (1992), 48 of which are on display, each image is a single-panel comic, replete with exaggerated colors and dialogue bubbles, of a particular scene from the Bible. In “Adam (Genesis 3:7),” the serpent-draped Tree of Life stands between Eve and Adam, who exclaims to his future wife: ‘We’re naked!’” As if this statement weren’t ridiculous enough, Rand plays it up by underlining the word “naked” three times. While Rand’s religious critics could point to this painting, along with many others in the series, as proof of the artist’s irreverence, the image’s comic-book flippancy is more a commentary on pop art than an expression of Rand’s take on Eden.

The exhibition’s most ambitious and impressive series is “The Seven Days of Creation” (1996), seven large, acrylic and enamel canvases full of warm, inviting colors and an intriguing combination of recognizable objects and hard-to-read iconography. As is appropriate for a story of division, “Day Two” — on which God created the firmament (often interpreted as the sky) that divides heaven and earth — is split in two. On one side of the canvas stands a chain of male revelers, linked arm in arm, which could have come out of a Weimar-era caricature. On the opposite side is a seated boy holding what looks like a drawing pad, but that also reads as a toy sailboat. Though the two halves are clearly separated by a vertical blue-and-white line that bisects the canvas like a Barnett Newman zip, the canvas’s strict division is violated by two other lines of thick paint, squirted almost directly from a tube onto canvas, like toothpaste onto a brush, which challenge the rigid barrier. This gesture of ambivalence is particularly fitting for the second day of creation, the only one that God neglected to praise as “good.”

It is a tribute to Rand as both painter and reader that the exhibition’s least successful works are its two individual canvases, “The Coming of the Messiah” (1978) and “Joshua” (1997), neither of which belongs to a series or follows a text as closely as the others. Yet ironically, these two images are also the most dependent on the biblical passages to which they refer. Among so many inspired paintings, they are the lone illustrations.

David Grosz is a writer living in New York.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.