CAMPAIGN CONFIDENTIAL

By E.J. Kessler

Published August 06, 2004, issue of August 06, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

BOSTON — As the campaigns of President Bush and Senator John Kerry try to outdo each other in outreach to the Jewish community, Arab American voters are feeling screwed to the wall.

While Arab Americans gave a strong plurality of their vote to George W. Bush in 2000, many now say they are repelled by his decision to launch the Iraq war and his support for the USA Patriot Act, as well as his perceived tilt toward Israel. Distress over the administration’s Middle East policy has led many Arabs to abandon their support of the president and to switch their allegiances to the Democratic ticket, a number of polls have found.

But the Arab American community also is feeling extremely frustrated by the strongly pro-Israel rhetoric of John Kerry’s presidential campaign, according to Arab American activists interviewed here last week during the Democratic National Convention or by telephone beforehand. As a result, they said, many voters could end up casting their ballots for independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader, himself an Arab American, or staying home.

“You have to win Florida and New York, so you cater to the [community] that wins you Florida and New York,” said Ali Dagher, an Arab American lawyer from Dearborn, Mich., who attended the convention as part of a contingent of activists from the Arab American Institute, referring to the Jewish community. “But you also have to have a formula for winning Michigan and Ohio,” he added, referring to two states with large Arab American populations.

Bush “lied and made commitments and promises that never came true, and Republican Arab Americans are completely disillusioned with the Bush campaign,” Dagher said. “But at this point you can’t be certain people will vote for Kerry, either. Nader’s doing well. How do you get that vote? The Democratic ticket has to do something to give an incentive to go to the polls.”

The question is not academic for either party. Like Jewish voters, Arab Americans are concentrated in battleground states. Bush is believed to have won about 46% of the Arab American vote to Gore’s 38% in 2000 — and, in Florida, where the election was settled, Arab support may have put him over the top.

Pollster John Zogby, an Arab American who has been tracking the key states, estimates that Arab Americans represent more than 5% of the vote in Michigan, 2% in Florida, 1.8% in Ohio and 1.5% in Pennsylvania — for a total of about 1 million voters in those four major states. In his latest tracking poll of 500 Arab American voters, taken from July 9 to July 11, 24.5% of respondents chose Bush, 54% chose Kerry and 21.5% answered “other/not sure.”

Zogby foresees big gains for the Democratic ticket.

“There’s always a risk and fear of suppression and a good-size Nader vote,” Zogby told the Forward. “But John Kerry has fulfilled the main criterion Arab Americans are looking for: He’s not George Bush. There’s no doubt in my mind Kerry will get the lion’s share of their vote, and that Bush will get 25%.”

Some Democrats said, in effect, Arab American voters really have nowhere else to turn.

“Arab Americans for whom the relations between Israelis and Palestinians is the most important issue are going to be frustrated this cycle because neither camp is going to give them any light,” said Democratic strategist Steve Rabinowitz. “The rhetoric on both sides is going to be extremely pro-Israel. For the Kerry campaign, I wouldn’t want it any other way.” Rabinowitz said, however, that Democratic positions on civil rights and civil liberties, the economy, education and immigration should resonate deeply with Arab Americans, many of whom are recent immigrants. “They should feel naturally at home in the Democratic Party,” he said.

The Bush losses stem from the sense of betrayal among Arab Americans owing to actions the Justice Department has taken in pursuing the war on terror. In 2000, Bush, an oilman whose father had a cool-to-antagonistic relationship with pro-Israel activists, reached out to Arab and Muslim Americans by taking positions against the use of “secret evidence” in terror-related inquiries. In a debate with Al Gore, he said: “Arab Americans are racially profiled on what’s called secret evidence. People are stopped. And we got to do something about that.”

But after the attacks of September 11, 2001, federal agents have targeted Arab American communities for mass questionings, have held up visas and have rounded up Arabs for immigration violations in hopes of shaking out terrorists seeking shelter there. Secrecy and profiling are increasingly used in law enforcement, Arab Americans contend, in contradiction to Bush’s promise.

Nowhere is the sense of betrayal more evident than in hotly contested Michigan, the state with the country’s largest Arab American population. More than any other part of the country, Michigan, which went narrowly for Gore, has seen the brunt of the Justice Department’s actions since September 11. Still, feelings for Kerry remain cool.

“The pulse [in the Arab American community] is not in favor of President Bush, but it is also not a solid pulse for Mr. Kerry,” said Imad Hamad, the Midwest regional director of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, a communal defense group, said in a telephone interview. Hamad said both parties pursue a “one-sided” foreign policy, but the Democrats are gaining on other issues.

“We have no illusions,” he said. “Mr. Kerry is like President Bush if not worse in some aspects [of foreign policy], but on the domestic level he might be a better chance.”

Asked if the Bush-Cheney campaign had tried to reach out locally to his community, Hamad said: “Nothing of that exists.” The campaign’s Michigan communications director, Stephanie Cathcart, did not return a call seeking comment by press time.

Rep. Darryl Issa, a California Republican of Lebanese heritage who is involved in informal Middle East diplomatic efforts, acknowledges that Bush is a “tough sell” among Arab Americans, but he said he would be making the case that a second term is “the best chance for a peace legacy.”

“If we want to make real changes, we must admit that the countries there have problems,” Issa said. “If [Bush] is not completely right, at least he’s opening up the sore and trying to clean out the infection.” In terms of promoting human rights and respect for law and democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq, he said: “This president has stayed the course.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.