True to Character, Olympic Mettle Eludes Israelis

THE SITUATION

By Ofer Shelah

Published August 20, 2004, issue of August 20, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

TEL AVIV — Once every four years, Israelis gather around their televisions to watch their representatives in the summer Olympic games, hoping for victory but expecting defeat. It’s partly a matter of experience — it took Israel 44 years to win its first Olympic medal, and it has yet to take a gold — but no less than that, a matter of national self image.

The first days of the current Athens games lived up to expectations. One by one, members of the Israeli delegation found new ways to lose, and even newer ways of explaining how they lost.

Vered Borochovski, a female swimmer, failed to advance because she tore her goggle strap just prior to the race. Nike Kornetzky and Vered Buskila, a sailing pair who had done well in World Championships, were first disqualified from one race and then had their boat capsize in another. Even politics failed to help the Israelis: After a world champion judoka from Iran disqualified himself on orders from Tehran not to face him, Israeli Ehud Vaks had a clear run at a medal. He promptly lost his next match and his chances of advancing.

And so it goes. Thirty-six athletes represented Israel in Athens. The Israeli Olympic Committee brazenly predicted no fewer than 12 participants in final rounds, with perhaps as many as nine medals. There was even talk of a first-ever gold medal; so far, Israel’s Olympic tally amounts to one silver and one bronze medal in the Barcelona games (1992), and a single bronze each in Atlanta (1996) and Sydney (2000).

As far as many Israelis are concerned, the meager total is symptomatic of deeper failings in the national character. Israelis like to think of themselves as resourceful and quick on their feet, but they don’t give themselves high marks for planning, order or ability to rise to the occasion. So it is in sports, in diplomacy and even economics.

Channel 2, the highest-rated TV channel in Israel, recently aired a documentary series titled “From Karkur to Singapore.” Karkur is a small town in central Israel, often spoken of — perhaps because of its odd-sounding name — as a local version of Smallville. The theme of the series was that Israel, unlike the East Asian island powerhouse, is not orderly, well-run — or successful. As it happens, Singapore hasn’t yet won a medal in Athens either, but that does nothing to change the perception the series is based on.

Another jarring aspect of the Olympic delegation, from the Israeli point of view, is the fact that half of the athletes are not Israeli-born, and some don’t even speak Hebrew very well. Israel has absorbed close to a million new immigrants in the past two decades, a source of enormous national pride, yet many of the athletes who have emerged from this human wave are viewed as mercenaries. Since many of them compete in sports that are far from popular — shooting, table tennis and canoeing are just three examples — they usually enter the public consciousness just prior to the games. Quickly afterward they disappear from view — and sometimes from Israel.

The real motives are not necessarily mercenary. Alex Danilov, an air pistol shooter, said candidly after a disappointing finish this week that he has to feed his family and train against tougher competition — and both are very difficult in Israel.

The best example of the “ours if you win, alien if you lose” approach in Athens was tennis player Anna Smashnova. Smashnova, who had won some pro tournaments, hardly visits Israel. She does her interviews in English, and is married to her Italian coach. Unlike other athletes, she doesn’t need the Olympics for money or recognition. She mostly wanted to be more accepted in her adopted homeland. But soon after losing miserably to a lower-ranked Italian opponent, she was vilified in the Israeli press for giving such little effort.

Israel’s great hopes for medals — judoka Arik Ze’evi, windsurfer Gal Friedman and pole vaulter Alexei Averbuch — still retain their chances. Should they manage to bring home even one gold, the perception of Israel’s part in Athens 2004 would be greatly altered. After all, another trait of the Israeli press — and of the national psyche, at least as reflected by it — is the way moods can change in a minute.

But is the sports-is-character analogy that far-fetched? Perhaps not. Just consider some recent maneuvering by Prime Minister Sharon. Under tremendous political pressure to separate from the Palestinians and stay close to the Americans without alienating his own right wing, Sharon has seemed lately to be improvising without a definite game plan. Just like some of the Israeli athletes in Athens, his performance has seemed to be all footwork and no strategy.

This fancy footwork is apparent, among other things, in the way he has been dodging some of the thornier issues in contention between Jerusalem and Washington. After failing to deliver on his repeated promises to President Bush to remove illegal outposts in the West Bank, Sharon is playing for time, trying to run the clock out until the presidential election. His special adviser and former bureau chief, Dov Weisglass, postponed a planned Washington visit this month until early September, hoping the Americans would be too preoccupied with the elections. That would allow Sharon to live another day without being called to task on the outposts.

Sharon has several advantages over the Olympic athletes. For one, he’s playing in front of a judge who has no inclination to call his fouls. This week he dodged a tough hit when the administration decided not to criticize him for authorizing the issuance of building tenders for 1,000 new homes in the West Bank settlements he had promised to freeze. The months-long standoff on the outposts, too, has been allowed to continue without resolution; the Bush administration periodically issues low-key condemnations, Israel explains its difficulties and the matter is permitted to fade from view.

Sharon has one more advantage over the Olympic athletes. His career is much longer than theirs, and in Israeli politics there is always a second chance. But lately, pundits agree, he is running out of chances. He’s currently scheduled to face the voters again in 2006, the same year as the next Olympics. Most odds-makers give him better odds that year than the Israeli Olympic team.

The trouble is, he may not be able to hold on that long. Ruling over a minority government since the spring, he has engaged in frantic coalition-building efforts that have so far produced little. With his own Likud reluctant to join a coalition that does not include an Orthodox party, Shinui in turmoil over the prospect of sharing power with the ultra-Orthodox and Labor continuing to balk over budget issues, Sharon could face his final hurdle sooner than he expected.






Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.