The Way We Were, The Way We Are

By Karla Goldman

Published September 10, 2004, issue of September 10, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Their arrival was not auspicious. When 23 Jews came to New Amsterdam on an early September day in 1654, 350 years ago, two of their number were thrown into jail as security for money still owed for the group’s passage. Although those still at liberty were able to pay off the fare by auctioning their remaining goods, their prospects were by no means secure.

The official welcome was not exactly warm. The settlement’s Dutch governor, Peter Stuyvesant, sent off a request to his superiors in Amsterdam for permission to expel immediately the “members of this deceitful race — such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ.” The Dutch Reformed Stuyvesant recognized the threat posed by their presence. If the right to settle was granted to the Jews, he argued, then the colony “would be unable to deny it to the Lutherans and Papists.”

As anniversary commemorations begin this week, American Jews will seek to draw out the meaning of this story and of the 350 years of negotiations, challenges, contributions and triumphs that have followed. In doing so, they will join with earlier generations of American Jews who have turned to the past to make sense of the present. In the process, they will have to confront the complexities of what it means to be a Jew and an American in challenging times.

Not surprisingly, many generations have seen in the story of the Jews of New Amsterdam a grand metaphor for American Jewish experience and life. Within it, they have found the classic immigrant tale of coming to this new world with nothing, facing discrimination but making it big nonetheless. In this case, they became a community that has made momentous contributions, achieved notable prosperity and acceptance, and established itself as a vital part of the American scene.

More importantly, perhaps, by insisting upon and winning the right to stay in New Amsterdam and to enjoy the privileges accorded all other European settlers, these pioneering Jews were instrumental in securing rights not just for “Lutherans and Papists,” but for every American minority. By demanding liberty and religious freedom for themselves, Jews helped to establish the very principles of American pluralism and religious freedom.

No doubt these seemingly timeless lessons, illustrating the integral participation of Jews in the American story, will be repeated often in coming days, as they were 50 and 100 years ago. But lessons drawn from the 350th anniversary of Jewish settlement in North America will just as inevitably reflect the challenges of our own particular historical moment.

One hundred years ago, at a time of burgeoning Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe and Russia, American Jewish leaders used 250th anniversary celebrations to establish the antiquity and authenticity of their claims upon American identity. When the actual celebration coincided with renewed violent anti-Jewish pogroms in Russia, anniversary orators focused upon the contrasts between Russian and American Jewish experience, pushing for the American government to call the Russians to task.

In 1954, a broad and well-organized tercentenary celebration reflected Cold War insecurities. Organizers spent their energy praising the United States for the unprecedented opportunities it had offered to Jews. Their celebratory theme, “Man’s Opportunities and Responsibilities Under Freedom,” emphasized how America benefited by embracing a group that other nations had rejected, offering a lesson in freedom to all Americans and to the whole world. This emphasis on the promise of American liberty helped to obscure the presence, within the tercentenary narrative, of conflict, women’s contributions and the struggles of other minorities.

Hindsight reveals the demands imposed by the McCarthy era on the 1954 celebrations of American Jewish history. Today’s Jewish community would probably prefer to offer up a commemoration, uninflected by political commitments. It is thus not surprising that the central umbrella group overseeing 350th activities has chosen to identify itself with the title “Celebrate 350,” avoiding any particular spin or interpretation.

And yet, we cannot escape our parlous times. We live in a moment defined by the September 11 terrorist attacks, controversy over the invasion of Iraq and a viciously contested presidential campaign. American Jews, moreover, face numerous existential challenges of their own. Republican spokesmen argue that Jews should abandon their traditional allegiance to the Democratic Party. Rising intermarriage rates are forcing individuals and religious movements to find new ways to sustain the Jewish community. An emerging story of intelligence leaks to Israel involving the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee raises troubling questions about dual loyalties. This is no simple time for defining and celebrating American Jewish identity.

Any meaningful commemoration will have to do more than just celebrate; it must offer opportunities to address the complexities of both past and present. Future observers will be able to judge how the American Jewish community of 2004 responded to this challenge. In the meantime, today’s American Jews should remember that in telling stories about their past, they will also be revealing who they have become.

Karla Goldman, historian in residence at the Jewish Women’s Archive, is author of “Beyond the Synagogue Gallery: Finding a Place for Women in American Judaism” (Harvard University Press, 2000).






Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.