Kristol Clear About War

By David Klinghoffer

Published April 23, 2004, issue of April 23, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Patrick Buchanan and other likeminded commentators have repeatedly tried to direct the public’s attention to the fact that, in the Iraq conflict, some of the leading pro-war advocates in the conservative movement have Jewish surnames. There’s Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith, not to mention Kristol, Frum and Weinstein. The presumption is that President Bush was led to invade Iraq by “neo-conservative” advisers with an interest mainly in seeing America defeat one of Israel’s enemies.

Once you consider that the actual decision makers and other key war planners aren’t Jewish at all — Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney and the president himself — the Buchananite conspiracy theory is easily revealed as the canard that it is. And yet the Jewishness of the aforementioned pro-war intellectuals isn’t entirely without interest.

These Jewish conservatives support the war for their own reasons, and not simply because they are Jewish. Likely without realizing it in most cases, though, they are being true to the spiritual heritage of their ancestors in rejecting the squeamishness of the anti-war crowd.

If the word “Judaism” means anything definite — as opposed to anything you want it to mean — then the content of the word needs to be sought in the textual tradition from which our heritage arises. To know what’s authentically Jewish, you have to open the classical works of Jewish faith, starting with the Bible.

When it comes to military conflict, the Hebrew Scriptures couldn’t be less squeamish. Begin with the way the Bible defines the role of government — basically, to make war and execute justice.

As told in the books of 1 & 2 Samuel, after centuries of being governed by judges, the Jewish people demand a sovereign ruler, and God gives them one in the person of Saul, anointed by the prophet Samuel.

The people cry, “Our king will judge us, and go forth before us, and fight our wars!” (1 Sam. 8:19). To be sure, God is displeased with their further demand that, in being ruled by a king, the Children of Israel should then be “like all the other nations.” Jews are not supposed to be like other peoples in every way. But the nature of kingship, and the centrality of war-making to it, is taken for granted by Samuel, Saul and the Lord Himself.

Later, Jewish law would make this even clearer. Maimonides concludes his greatest work, the “Mishneh Torah,” with a section called “Laws of Kings and their Wars.” The Jewish leader he anticipates isn’t the prime minister of Israel, but the Messiah, so not everything the sage says can be applied practically to the actions of our present-day rulers, whether Jewish or non-Jewish. But the values implicit in the laws are what matters, and they are straight out of the Bible.

“The purpose of appointing a king,” writes Maimonides, “is only to execute justice and wage wars.” Some of the laws of war, Jewish-style, may alarm modern readers.

In fighting a defensive war, the king is granted enormous leniency. He must first offer peace to the enemy, defined as total surrender. But once this has been rejected, the king needs nobody’s permission, not even the United Nations’, to enter into ferocious combat.

When the war is not, strictly speaking, defensive, he consults the legislative branch of government, the Sanhedrin. With their agreement, however, he is again free to act with few restraints, provided that all his deeds are for the sake of Heaven. Basing himself on Deuteronomy (20:13), Maimonides has no patience for quibbles about the distinction between combatants and non-combatants. In the Jewish understanding, enemy males may be in or out of uniform: “All males past the age of majority should be killed.”

Offense is understood as smart defense. As Maimonides writes, the king may even wage war “to expand the borders of Israel or magnify [his] greatness and reputation.” What’s the defensive value of that?

Protecting your own people may require striking awe into the hearts of those who threaten you. President Bush understands this. It explains a lot about why we made war on Iraq, when that country was not directly responsible for the atrocity that started it all, that of September 11.

Sometimes, a campaign to intimidate enemies — that is, defense achieved through offense — may work by terrifying dangerous bad guys on whom you aren’t even making war. That is, attack Saddam Hussein and you thereby throw a scare into Osama bin Laden.

When, under Samuel’s leadership, the Jews waged a successful campaign against the Philistines, the Bible immediately notes: “and there was peace between Israel and the Amorites” (1 Sam. 7:14) — a totally different foreign aggressor nation, whom the text hasn’t even seen fit to mention till this point. The Amorites saw what Israel did to the Philistines, and decided to make themselves inconspicuous.

Does this mean the Jewish neoconservatives are right to advocate the continuing pursuit of warfare in Iraq, till that nation is rebuilt as a democracy? Not necessarily. I could be reading these Biblical and other sources all wrong, but I doubt it. Or the Bible, which Christians like the president — no less than Jews — have found to be a repository of ancient and tested wisdom, could be wrong. But I doubt that too.

David Klinghoffer is the author of “Discovery of God: Abraham and the Birth of Monotheism” and the forthcoming “Why the Jews Rejected Jesus” (Doubleday).

Find us on Facebook!
  • From Gene Simmons to Pink — Meet the Jews who rock:
  • The images, which have since been deleted, were captioned: “Israel is the last frontier of the free world."
  • As J Street backs Israel's operation in Gaza, does it risk losing grassroots support?
  • What Thomas Aquinas might say about #Hamas' tunnels:
  • The Jewish bachelorette has spoken.
  • "When it comes to Brenda Turtle, I ask you: What do you expect of a woman repressed all her life who suddenly finds herself free to explore? We can sit and pass judgment, especially when many of us just simply “got over” own sexual repression. But we are obliged to at least acknowledge that this problem is very, very real, and that complete gender segregation breeds sexual repression and unhealthy attitudes toward female sexuality."
  • "Everybody is proud of the resistance. No matter how many people, including myself, disapprove of or even hate Hamas and its ideology, every single person in Gaza is proud of the resistance." Part 2 of Walid Abuzaid's on-the-ground account of life in #Gaza:
  • After years in storage, Toronto’s iconic red-and-white "Sam the Record Man" sign, complete with spinning discs, will return to public view near its original downtown perch. The sign came to symbolize one of Canada’s most storied and successful Jewish family businesses.
  • Is $4,000 too much to ask for a non-member to be buried in a synagogue cemetery?
  • "Let’s not fall into the simplistic us/them dichotomy of 'we were just minding our business when they started firing rockets at us.' We were not just minding our business. We were building settlements, manning checkpoints, and filling jails." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: 10,000 Israel supporters gathered for a solidarity rally near the United Nations in New York yesterday.
  • Step into the Iron Dome with Tuvia Tenenbom.
  • What do you think of Wonder Woman's new look?
  • "She said that Ruven Barkan, a Conservative rabbi, came into her classroom, closed the door and turned out the lights. He asked the class of fourth graders to lie on the floor and relax their bodies. Then, he asked them to pray for abused children." Read Paul Berger's compelling story about a #Savannah community in turmoil:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.