Administration Pushes Disengagement Plan for Gaza

By Ori Nir

Published June 11, 2004, issue of June 11, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON — Though skeptical about the reliability of the political process in Jerusalem, the Bush administration and its international partners are pushing hard for implementation of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s disengagement plan after it was approved Sunday by his Cabinet.

The Bush administration reacted with guarded relief this week to the passage of Sharon’s plan to withdraw Israeli troops and settlements from the Gaza and the northern part of the West Bank. In turn, pro-Israel activists were voicing their own sense of relief over what they viewed as the aversion of a crisis in American-Israeli relations.

Pro-Israel activists here were overtly embarrassed about the dynamics of the Israeli political system, which some characterized as dysfunctional, and concerned by the growing sense that Sharon’s credibility in Washington was eroding. Jewish activists now say they were told by administration officials that Sharon regained some of the considerable credit he had enjoyed at the White House by sacking the two National Union ministers, Benny Elon and Avigdor Lieberman, who were actively opposing the plan from inside Sharon’s coalition government.

In a sign of the shifting fortunes, the executive committee of the Anti-Defamation League this week passed a resolution enthusiastically endorsing the Sharon plan. Last week, in an interview with the Forward, the ADL’s national director, Abraham Foxman, described Sharon’s inability to implement his plan as “very embarrassing.”

The White House, in a statement issued Monday, welcomed the Cabinet decision, hailing Sharon’s plan as “a courageous and historic step.” The administration urged “that practical preparatory work to implement the plan now proceed as rapidly as possible in Israel.”

While clearly encouraged by the Israeli Cabinet’s vote, administration officials, who were disappointed several times before when Sharon’s plan hit bumps on the road to government approval, voiced skepticism. A senior administration official, briefing reporters at Sea Island, Ga. — where President Bush hosted the leaders of the G-8 Group of Industrialized Nations — indicated that Washington is not sure whether the Sharon plan will in fact be implemented. Administration officials said that they consider the plan, as approved by the Israeli Cabinet, to be the same plan that President Bush signed on to in April. They also said that America now expects swift Israeli, Palestinian, Egyptian, Jordanian and international action to prepare for the implementation of the plan.

The goal, said State Department Spokesman Adam Ereli, is to address “the immediate and practical necessities of enabling the Palestinian Authority to assume and exercise its responsibilities” in the areas evacuated by Israel. That is also the objective — and the prospective outcome — of an “action plan” drafted by the United States and its “Quartet” partners, the United Nations, the European Union and Russia. The draft, obtained by the Reuters news agency, assigns tasks to the United States, Europe, Egypt and Israel to prepare the ground for an orderly handover of the Gaza to an empowered Palestinian Authority.

Although Sharon’s disengagement plan was not on the agenda of the G-8 meeting was pervasive in discussions between world leaders and Arab leaders on the plans to reform the Arab world. Administration officials told reporters that the plan’s approval came at the right time to show reluctant Arab leaders that there is momentum toward Israeli-Palestinian peace.

The U.S. official who spoke to reporters at the G-8 meeting said that the administration rejected the notion that lack of progress in Israeli-Palestinian peace-making should serve as a pretext for Arab governments to avoid introducing internal reforms. “Whether there is or is not the kind of rapid progress that we would like to see” on Sharon’s plan, the official said, “that should not provide an excuse” for political oppression in the Arab world.

Find us on Facebook!
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.