Putting the Squeeze on Social Security

By Gus Tyler

Published June 18, 2004, issue of June 18, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The Social Security system upon which millions of retired Americans depend for their daily bread is in danger. And it is not due to any inherent faults within the system itself. Indeed, the Social Security system is, by far, the most successful profit-making operation that Uncle Sam ever has run.

Created in 1935, the system began to pay out benefits immediately to those retiring without waiting to accumulate surpluses. How was that possible? It was a pay-as-you-go system. The contribution of those employed carried those retiring. Today, the system has multiple sources of income. It has accumulated assets of approximately a trillion dollars. It gets approximately a 6% return on that investment — or approximately $60 billion a year. It also draws income from taxes paid by retirees on the benefits they receive.

Despite these pluses, there is one great minus. Its name is George Bush, whose policies may well turn the profitable plan into a pitiable pauper. Here’s how.

By law, all the assets of the Social Security system must be invested in federal government securities. The reason is that those who wrote the law knew only too well from their recent experiences with The Great Depression that no corporation — no matter how high and mighty — was the safest place to put money. They wanted the money to be invested someplace where the “full faith and credit” of Uncle Sam stood behind every buck.

The assumption was that Uncle Sam would have the money to rescue the Social Security system if its current income began to fall behind its current expenses. But in light of the incredible deficits that the Bush administration is now piling up that will add trillions to the debt burden of Uncle Sam, it is highly dubious that Bush or his successor will have the means to meet the government’s sworn obligations.

The only way out, in this squeeze, as in other times with other countries, would be to do what Germany had to do after World War I; namely, relieve its embarrassment by resorting to the printing press and turning out paper money that is hardly worth the paper on which it is printed.

This was not supposed to be what Bush promised and predicted. He told the nation that his tax cuts to enrich America’s riches would drip down to everyone and would so stimulate the economy that Uncle Sam’s income would rise and the Treasury would be registering surpluses. Actually, the tax cuts did just the opposite. The gift to the richest has been depriving the U.S. Treasury of multibillions. And, some of the first victims will be those on retirement and those soon to retire.

But that is only part one of the ruinous Bush-backed policies. He has been advocating a policy of allowing workers to withdraw from the system that invests their contributions in U.S. government securities and to put their money into Wall Street. In effect, he is suggesting that corporate securities are safer than his very own U.S. Treasury securities. If so, why should anyone buy U.S. Treasury “securities”?

But — a big “but” — every dollar that a worker entrusts to Wall Street is a dollar less contributed to the Social Security Trust Fund. That would speed up the Social Security Trust Fund’s need to appeal for help to a U.S. Treasury that would itself be a helpless, hopeless, heap of papier-mâché.

Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.