Time To Tone Down Criticism of Saudis

By Edward S. Walker Jr.

Published January 16, 2004, issue of January 16, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

With the American presidential campaign heating up, many candidates have been tempted to take a swing at Saudi Arabia. It is a soft target and, as is frequently the case in political campaigns, candidates often fail to consider carefully the facts of the situation or the long-term consequences of their rhetoric for our country’s foreign relations.

Nevertheless, I had tended to doubt that the current wave of criticism would have a lasting impact on American-Saudi relations. After all, campaign rhetoric should always be taken with a grain of salt. How many presidential candidates, for instance, have promised to move the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and how many have made good on their pledge?

Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Abdullah, when we spoke during my visit to the kingdom in December, agreed with my assessment. He said that the mounting criticism of his country in the United States was of limited significance. The crown prince said he saw nothing new in the current American political rhetoric. In any event, he seemed to have given up on trying to convince the American media or members of Congress that Saudi Arabia is committed to genuine reform and the fight against terrorism. And, to be blunt, he didn’t seem to care what we thought. In the overall scheme of things, the crown prince told me, it didn’t matter what the United States said or did on these issues because Saudi Arabia was engaged in fighting terrorism for its own reasons, its own interests and its own survival.

Based on other conversations I had during my visit, however, I fear that the crown prince and I may have been wrong to discount the significance of American criticism. Indeed, at the very time Saudi Arabia is on the brink of profound change, we are distancing ourselves from the ruling family and the Saudi people. This development, I fear, has the potential to undermine the implementation of crucial reforms in Saudi Arabia and, consequently, undercut our own war on terrorism.

The criticism of the Saudis has many aspects, some of which are clearly justified from our perspective. The Saudis were slow to recognize the problems they were creating through uncontrolled funding of Islamic fundamentalist causes. And they were hesitant to cooperate fully with the United States in the war on terrorism until this past year.

But if you ask the question “Are the Saudis fully engaged with us in the war on terrorism today?” the answer has to be “yes.” And perhaps, given the religious overtones of the terrorist threat, Saudi efforts will be more critical to our success than anything we can do. The Saudis have the credibility and the religious credentials in the Islamic world to challenge and defeat the radical fundamentalist interpretations of Islam that underpin the terrorists’ ideology.

Since May, when the Saudis began to suffer from suicide bombings by Islamic extremists in their own country, they have shown a substantial commitment to fighting their homegrown terrorists and cooperating with American authorities; at least this is what my friends in our government tell me.

In fact, the Saudis are going further than I had expected or hoped in their fight against terrorism. In addition to rounding up suspects, cooperating with the FBI and amending their laws to control the flow of funds to Islamic charities, the Saudi ruling family is engaged in a unified effort to delegitimize extremists and deny terrorists theological justification for their heinous acts. The Saudis are going to the root of the problem, while we can only address its symptoms.

While I was in the Saudi capital of Riyadh, a highly publicized speech to a body of leading Islamic religious scholars was delivered in the name of the long-incapacitated King Fahd. The speech urged the scholars to “highlight the dangers which extremism poses to the Muslim faith” and to work to “correct the flaws in the thinking of some Muslims through dialogue in seminars, conferences and the media.” The speech stressed that “deviant thinking” has led to terrorism in the kingdom and encouraged the scholars to devise religious arguments to annul “aberrant fatwas,” or religious decrees, that legitimize militancy and suicide bombings.

In and of itself, this was an extraordinary statement that threw down the gauntlet to those, such as Al Qaeda, who advocate an extremist form of Islam. But the king’s statement is being backed up on the ground by a series of actions. More than 2,000 imams who preached militancy have been removed from their pulpits, and 1,500 have been jailed or sent for reeducation. In December, while I was in the kingdom, two very prominent Saudi imams publicly recanted fatwas in which they had justified terrorism.

The Saudi war against religious extremism is a struggle that is critical to the future of Saudi Arabia, and the outcome could have a profound impact on the United States and our friends in Israel and Europe. Should extremism prevail in the kingdom, it will have a pernicious impact on other Arab states. Indeed, an extremist takeover in Saudi Arabia would be far more likely to have a “domino effect” on other countries than would the example of a democratic state in Iraq.

Saudi businessmen I met with emphasized that the struggle against extremism needed to be accompanied by an agenda of political reforms — an agenda that the crown prince has embraced. In June, the crown prince declared a reform initiative calling for the development of political participation through a “national dialogue,” a formal series of discussions along the lines of town hall meetings. He said the purpose of this initiative was to build a consensus for reforms rather than creating a political process that would divide people along ideological lines. The crown prince told me that this effort would include all segments of society, including Shiites and other groups that had long been relegated to the margins of Saudi life. Moreover, in October, Saudi authorities announced that they would prepare for elections to be held within one year that would select half the members of each of the kingdom’s municipal councils, an unprecedented step toward democratization.

Still, government officials and businessmen sounded a note of caution in our discussions. Many cited the example of King Faisal, who undertook reforms only to be assassinated in 1975 by a fanatically religious nephew. The crown prince made it clear that he was dealing with a traditional and deeply religious society and that he did not want to follow the example of Kuwait, where the government sought to include women in the parliament only to have its efforts rebuffed by the legislature itself. The crown prince advocated moving forward slowly but steadily.

Still, for the first time in my memory, Saudi businessmen were quietly optimistic about the direction in which the kingdom was headed on essential reforms. But they warned that in order for it to succeed the reform process must be internally driven. And because the forces opposed to reform are so deeply entrenched in Saudi society, only the royal family has the ability to bring about fundamental change.

In addition, they disagreed with the crown prince’s assessment of the significance of American criticism. They said that the criticism of the royal family tends to delegitimize the regime and provides ammunition to extremists. Moreover, they warned, the criticism has helped fuel a growing estrangement between the United States and the Saudi people.

At the popular level there is a great deal of anger and frustration directed at the United States, not so much because of our criticisms, but rather stemming from the perception that we have abandoned the Palestinians and our close identification in Saudi minds with Israeli Prime Minister Sharon’s policies. At the level of the elites, however, we are being driven apart because American criticisms of Saudi Arabia are seen as creating an atmosphere in the United States of paranoia and fear of Saudis. Businessmen are afraid to travel to the United States. Fathers are afraid to send their sons to American universities. According to the American embassy in Riyadh, we have seen a 70% decline in visa applications to the United States. The fact that most of the Saudi elite has been educated in the United States has been a substantial part of the glue that has held our two countries together. It is this elite that supports reform efforts and opposes extremism. And it is this elite that we are walking away from.

The future of Saudi-American relations is in doubt at the very time that the future of our wars on terrorism and extremism may depend more than ever on the success of Saudi efforts. Of course we need to be candid in conveying our concerns to the Saudi authorities as they arise, but we also need to recognize that reform of any society is a long process. To make that process work, the Saudi leadership needs the friendship and understanding of the American people and particularly of our president.

Edward S. Walker Jr. is the president of the Middle East Institute. He has served as American ambassador to the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Israel and was assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs from January 2000 to May 2001.

Find us on Facebook!
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.