Professor Waxes Philosophical on Online Intimacy

By Max Gross

Published February 20, 2004, issue of February 20, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

In the course of researching his new book about cyber sex and online relationships, Haifa University philosophy professor Aaron Ben-Ze’ev came across a couple who had reached an unusual understanding.

The husband discovered that his wife was having cyber affairs. She and her virtual partners would exchange amorous (and sexually explicit) messages on the Internet, and he began to worry that her virtual desires might end up leading to real-life attractions to these dot-com Don Juans.

The husband laid down a rule. “Okay,” he said. “You can have cybersex with somebody, but not more than twice with the same person.”

Is it considered adultery to have a one-time cyberfling with a stranger?

What do you say to your husband when he spends more time with some cyberfloozy whom he met in a chat room than he spends with you? Have you ever caught your wife stroking her keypad late at night when she thought you were asleep?

Virtual sex and other forms of Internet intimacy have serious implications — sometimes leading to dire consequences. Their prevalence has prompted some to think seriously about the moral and religious implications of new technology. Ben-Ze’ev, author of “The Subtlety of Emotions,” examines these questions in “Love Online: Emotions on the Internet” (Cambridge, 2004).

Ben-Ze’ev, who says he has been happily married for 19 years, has never been a party to cyber flirtations or flings. He began thinking about such things in 2001, when Oranim College in Tivon, near Haifa, asked him to give a lecture about the emotional implications of Internet usage. Ever since, he has been examining literature about the psychological and emotional effects the Internet has on its users. He drew most of his conclusions from this extensive research, as well as several cybercouples. Heavily peppered with adages and quotes drawn from personal ads, celebrities, literary icons and others — among them Mae West, Zsa Zsa Gabor, Mark Twain, Goethe, Steve Martin and Yogi Berra — his decidedly secular book explores current practices in Israel, the United States and continental Europe.

While many find it exciting, online intimacy has its dangers.

“Internet affairs are a new toy that the human race has not yet learned how to play with,” Ben-Ze’ev told the Forward. Just as “drugs artificially stimulate, cybersex stimulates pleasure in the mind. Both are very dangerous,” he said, adding that the temptations of the Internet are ignited by four factors: imagination, availability, interactivity and anonymity.

This anonymity often elicits dishonesty. “According to one survey, 48% of people admitted to changing their age occasionally,” Ben-Ze’ev said. Almost 40% admitted that they sometimes changed their race, and 5% claimed to have changed their gender.

But, Ben-Ze’ev said, such lies can only last so long. Ben-Ze’ev cited a flowering cyber-relationship that was cut short when one partner made a confession: “He” was a woman.

The online partner was devastated, writing, “How can you deceive me in this manner?” The two did not speak until a few days later, when the unmasked cyberlover received an e-mail. “I have something to confess,” it said. “I am not a woman. I am a man.” The two eventually married.

Yet the communication between online lovers, Ben-Ze’ev noted, is often more profound and honest than in their other relationships.

He discovered that, when a sincere bond has taken hold, the emotional attachments people form to online lovers sometimes trump their feelings for their real-life partners. The author spoke with a married woman who was devastated to find that her husband thought his cyber partner was “the most intelligent woman he’s ever talked to.” Ben-Ze’ev quoted a man who fantasized about his cyber partners when making love to his wife.

There is also the danger that online relationships can lead to offline relationships, making their way into real-life romances.

Ben-Ze’ev cited the Jewish state as an example. “Israel is a small country,” he said. “When your online partner is a few miles away, [the temptation] to meet them face-to-face” is huge.

Ben-Ze’ev is not the only Jewish thinker who has set his mind to work on the problem of the Internet’s lascivious underbelly.

In January, the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot reported that Shlomo Eliahu, chief rabbi of Safed, had come up with a prayer to protect pious Jews from the temptations of the Internet. “Please God, help me cleanse the computer of viruses and evil photographs that disturb and ruin my work, so that I shall be able to cleanse myself,” the prayer reads.

Eliahu says he came up with the prayer after being inundated by requests from Orthodox Jews who claimed that Internet smut was becoming a problem in their families.

Ben-Ze’ev has not, himself, encountered many observant Jews ensconced in the world of cybersex. While some of the people he interviewed for his book were strictly observant Jews, most were not. But he said that Eliahu’s prayer showed the problem existed, and he found the prayer encouraging.

“Praying before going on the Internet is much better than forbidding people to go on the Internet,” Ben-Ze’ev said. He added that the Internet “is such a useful, efficient tool nowadays; there is no way to go against it. Any prayer may help.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.