Aufbau Must Relocate or Close

By Nathaniel Popper

Published March 05, 2004, issue of March 05, 2004.
  • Print
  • Share Share

For the Jewish immigrants who founded the German-language newspaper Aufbau in 1934, America represented the future and Germany the past. Things certainly have changed.

Just days after the Jewish newspaper’s 70th-anniversary issue was published last week, editors said the paper’s financial situation in America had grown so tenuous that it faced the stark choice of either shutting its doors or moving to Germany in hopes of finding a new sponsor and new readers.

“The soil is tough in America for our little seedling,” said Andreas Mink, Aufbau’s editor. “In Germany now, the environment for a Jewish paper is much more positive.”

The New York offices may produce one more issue of the biweekly newspaper, said Mink, but after that, the money will run out. Negotiations are under way with the Berlin Jewish community to join forces with its Jewish newspaper, Juedisches Berlin, which would make Aufbau, at least partly, into the local Jewish paper it never was. But it is either that, or the end.

Aufbau, which means “construction” in German, was founded by refugees fleeing the Nazis who wanted to help fellow newcomers adjust to life in the United States. Manfred George, the paper’s most storied editor, wrote that Aufbau “is an American paper in which American problems and the future in America are given first consideration.” Thanks to the highly educated German Jewish immigrants coming to New York, the paper also became known for serious writing from such big-name authors as Thomas Mann, Albert Einstein and Hannah Arendt.

But the paper never outgrew its original immigrant readership, and as those immigrants have passed away in recent years, the circulation has gone with them. In the 1990s, the German-language paper began publishing some articles in English in an effort to attract a younger audience, but the circulation did not rise much above the current figure of 5,000.

The declining fortunes of the paper caused heated debate as staffers discussed the way forward, according to Talia Bloch, one of two editors of English-language material, who stands to lose her job in the upcoming move.

“A few of us felt that we should move to even more English,” said Bloch. “This was a paper founded by immigrants, and so the natural audience was the children and grandchildren of those immigrants.”

But Mink felt otherwise. In 2001, a few years after the transition to a bilingual paper, Aufbau established its first German office, in Berlin. The growing reader base in Germany since then has, in part, reflected the growing interest in Jewish history and culture among non-Jewish Germans — a trend that is exemplified by Mink, who is himself a non-Jewish German with an obvious interest in all things Jewish.

But the paper also found new readers among the growing Russian-Jewish immigrant population in Germany — a community that has grown by more than 80,000 in the past decade and is underserved by local Jewish institutions. Moving to Germany would allow Aufbau, a paper that was originally dedicated to cultivating the Jewish roots of an immigrant community, to return to that project, albeit in a decidedly different setting.

Shifting the paper’s main office to Germany — leaving only a small satellite office operating in New York — would involve some serious compromises for the paper. For instance, in New York, Aufbau has been funded by an independent not-for-profit trust, while in Germany it would become dependent on the organized Jewish community for its funding.

Still, appealing to this new German audience rather than the old American audience makes sense, according to Jonathan Sarna, a professor of American Jewish history at Brandeis University.

“The world does not need another English-language paper,” Sarna said. “In Germany, on the other hand, there is a growing community that is underserviced by Jewish periodicals. No paper can last long on nostalgia.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.