How Much Is a Parent Worth? Holocaust Program Says $1,800

By Nathaniel Popper

Published March 17, 2006, issue of March 17, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The Hungarian government soon will begin paying family members of Holocaust victims $1,800 for each sibling or parent who was murdered, rekindling old debates about “blood money” and the limits of reparations.

The Hungarians agreed to the payments during a meeting in Budapest last week with the president of the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany. The initiative revives a 1997 program that paid Hungarian survivors $150 for each parent and $70 for each sibling who was killed in the Holocaust. Few survivors applied under the old program.

Many European countries have provided compensation to victims of the Holocaust, but Hungary’s program is unusual. Past programs in Germany, Switzerland and France, among other countries, have provided money for stolen property or have compensated survivors for the pain they themselves suffered. The Hungarian payments are different because they are connected directly to the death of a person. As a result, the payments raise tough questions about the morality of accepting money for losses endured during the Holocaust.

“It’s proper to pay for everything they took away from us — but not lives,” said Aliza Burger, who came from the Hungarian town of Munkacs. “How can I accept money for people? You cannot put a value on people’s lives.”

Burger lost her entire family in the Holocaust — including two younger brothers and both parents. In the past, Burger, 77, has applied to be compensated for insurance policies

and Swiss bank accounts that her family held before the war, which were confiscated when the Nazis invaded Hungary. But Burger said she would not consider applying for the $7,200 she could now receive for the death of her four family members.

“God forbid they kill your parents and give you money for it,” Burger said.

Burger’s anxieties were echoed in interviews with other Hungarian survivors, although many said that they would rather take the money than allow the Hungarian government to keep it.

“This is not going to bring my father back or replace his value,” said Magda Preisz, 70, whose father was killed when her family was living in Budapest during the war. “On the other hand, I’m going to take every penny that they give. They got to pay something.”

The Hungarian program joins a raft of reparations and restitution programs that have been negotiated by the Claims Conference, which was created in 1954 to represent Jewish organizations worldwide in reparations negotiations with the former West Germany. Germany has since paid more than $40 billion to survivors. More recently, agreements have been reached on restitution of property stolen from victims, resulting in billions of dollars in payments by Germany, Austria and Switzerland for looted bank accounts, slave labor and confiscated property. Since then there has been a steady trickle of new programs negotiated by the Claims Conference.

The Hungarian program came out of negotiations led by the president of the Claims Conference, Rabbi Israel Singer. The exact rules have not been published, but it is expected that the relatives of Hungarian victims will have a four-month span to apply for the money at some point later this year. A family will receive 400,000 forints, or $1,800, for each deceased relative, to be divided among surviving relatives. (Those familiar with the situation say that the connection to 18 — the numerical value of the Hebrew word for life, chai — is a coincidence.)

Many will not have to split the money. Alex Moskowitz, for instance, lost two brothers and two parents and has no other living relatives. All together, more than 400,000 Hungarians lost their lives during the Holocaust.

The executive director of the Claims Conference, Gideon Taylor, acknowledged that the Hungarian program is a departure from past programs for survivors.

“Because of the structure, there’s heightened symbolism,” Taylor said. “It doesn’t change the fundamental, which is that all of these programs are about symbolism and not about compensation.”

Thane Rosenbaum, a law professor who has been heavily involved with reparations’ proceedings, said that the unusual nature of the Hungarian program has a virtue because it recognizes the loss of the victims, which past programs did not.

“Now that the world is losing survivors, it’s good to remember that two out of every three Jews never got to be a survivor,” said Rosenbaum, author of “The Myth of Moral Justice.”

But, Rosenbaum added, this program, like many past ones, is problematic because it deals with losses in purely monetary terms, rather than with an apology or any effort at historical reconciliation. The fact that the money is for a life, rather than for a physical loss, makes the situation that much worse, he said.

“You’re getting a check that you can’t even pay rent with,” Rosenbaum said. “That’s somehow defining who your father was.”

Judith Bihaly, a 71-year-old survivor from Hungary, took the moral arguments like Rosenbaum’s to heart. Bihaly said that in the 1950s, she and thousands of other survivors protested the Israeli government’s decision to accept Holocaust reparation payments from Germany. When, as part of another reparations program, she was sent a check for $2,000 many years later, she immediately signed it over to her mother.

“It almost felt that I was defiling myself by physically touching the check,” Bihaly said.

As the years have gone by, though, Bihaly said she has come to regret her decision as she sees survivors around her receiving a pension from Germany and a “decent life as a result of the income they received.”

Bihaly is planning to apply to the Hungarians for the loss of her father. She will not receive anything for her twin brother, who committed suicide in 1968, haunted by memories of the camps.

“I still feel that it is blood money,” Bihaly said. “But I regret not having the money.”






Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.