Geneva Agreement Repeats Oslo’s Mistakes

By Morton Klein

Published October 31, 2003, issue of October 31, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The Geneva Understandings, the agreement reached recently among a group of dovish Israeli politicians and Palestinians, repeat the mistakes of the 1993 Oslo accord by requiring Israel to make dangerous concessions in exchange for unverifiable Palestinian promises.

But the Geneva agreement is even worse than the previous peace initiative, because it comes after 10 years of constant Palestinian violations of the Oslo accords, violations which prove unequivocally that they have no interest in peace. No wonder former Labor prime minister Ehud Barak has denounced the Geneva Understandings as “delusional.”

The understandings require that Israel withdraw to the indefensible pre-1967 borders, which the late Abba Eban, one of Israel’s most outspoken doves, called “Auschwitz lines.” The Jewish state would be reduced to nine miles wide at its midsection — approximately the width of Washington, D.C. Furthermore, only tiny modifications of the border would be allowed, and even then Israel would have to give the Palestinian Authority an equal amount of territory from within the pre-1967 areas.

The authors of the agreement argue for the immediate creation of a sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Will that satisfy Palestinian aspirations and convince them to make peace with Israel? Unlikely. Syria, Iran and North Korea are sovereign states, and that hasn’t made them peaceful.

Giving the Palestinians sovereignty means strengthening their ability to shelter terrorists. Israel’s major population centers — Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Haifa — will be within easy striking distance of Palestinian terrorists, who could blow up an Israeli bus and then, within minutes, reach the safety of sovereign Palestine. If Israel chases the terrorists across the border it would violate another country’s sovereignty, triggering international condemnations and perhaps even sanctions.

Another flaw of the Geneva agreement is its one-sided approach to the question of timetables. There is a timetable for Israeli withdrawals, but no reference to any timetable for the Palestinian Authority to disband terrorist groups — which it calls “irregular forces or armed bands” — and no reference whatsoever to confiscating the tens of thousands of illegal weapons in the hands of terrorists. The process could drag on for years, even decades, while terrorists murder Jews and the government of Palestine insists it is “doing its best” to find the weapons.

The Geneva Understandings would divide Jerusalem. The eastern part of the city would become the capitol of Palestine. For 2,000 years, Jews prayed, dreamed and longed for the return of Jerusalem to Jewish hands. The Geneva agreement would tear Jerusalem apart and hand half of it to Yasser Arafat.

The understandings leave open the door to the Palestinians’ “right of return” to the State of Israel. It allows refugees to choose among five options, one of which is settling in Israel. Israel can limit the number it takes, but the Israelis are required to “take into account the average number taken in by the third countries.” Significantly, P.A. Foreign Minister Nabil Sha’ath last week branded as “unacceptable” a recent European proposal limiting the right of return to the boundaries of a Palestinian state.

The Geneva Understandings state that “Palestine shall be a non-militarized state with a strong security force.” The final decision as to what weapons it will be allowed to have would be in the hands of an International Verification Group. Inevitably the group’s members will include parties that have been consistently unfriendly to Israel and sympathetic to the Palestinians, such as the European Union, United Nations, Russia and the State Department — which for the last 10 years has regularly whitewashed P.A. violations of Oslo.

We would do well to remember what Henry Kissinger wrote to President Richard Nixon in 1970, concerning Egypt’s violations of a cease-fire agreement with Israel: “We have an incentive to minimize such evidence, since the consequences of finding violations are so unpleasant [and] risk the blowup of our initiative…. Accordingly, we tend to lean over backwards to avoid the conclusion that the Arabs are violating the cease-fire.”

The International Verification Group is, according to the agreement, to be dissolved after five years. At that point Israel, reduced to its narrow 1967 borders and straddled by a sovereign Palestine state, will have to trust the Palestinians to be peaceful — the same Palestinians who have spent the last three years slaughtering nearly 1,000 Jews and raising an entire generation to hate Jews and glorify mass murder.

What impact will the Geneva Understandings have on Israel?

The Geneva Understandings will weaken Israel’s negotiating position. When prominent Israelis press the Israeli government to make more concessions, it sends a message to the Arabs that if they hold out longer, they will be able to extract more land and other concessions from Israel.

Whatever one’s view of how to resolve issues such as borders, we should all be able to agree that undermining Israel’s negotiating position, especially in the midst of a war, is simply wrong.

Morton Klein is national president of the Zionist Organization of America.

Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  •'s Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.