Letter to a Young Venture Philanthropist

By Mark Charendoff

Published June 20, 2003, issue of June 20, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Judging from the explosion in popularity of “venture philanthropy” initiatives in local communities, one would be excused for thinking we are in the midst of a renaissance of sorts.

In federation after federation, these new groups are beginning with great fanfare and proceeding, or ending, with decidedly mixed results. One thing is certain, though: They are not all “venture” philanthropy. Just calling it a duck won’t make it quack.

The term “venture philanthropy” gained some initial currency after a 1997 Harvard Business Review article argued that there was much that a philanthropic foundation could learn from venture capitalists. The article was widely discussed at the time, and not all of the comments were glowing.

A great deal of opposition to the notion of venture philanthropy emerged in the foundation world, as well as the not-for-profit community. Many of the principles articulated in the article were abused by the former and criticized by the latter. Still, there is much wisdom to be found in the idea.

So, what should a good venture philanthropist do? One of the greatest market advantages that an independent funder has — whether they have a foundation or not — is the ability to fail. When you are prepared to fail, while fervently hoping to succeed, it means that you are prepared to risk. And when you are prepared to risk you are going to end up funding interesting things.

Some of the most innovative projects in today’s Jewish communities came about because an independent funder or group of funders took a risk on a long shot. A calculated risk, perhaps, but they invested money in a passionate individual with a dream and they were prepared to walk away from that money if it did not work out.

Like the good venture capitalist, they keep a varied portfolio of investments — some blue chips with a certain, though modest, return; some moderately risky but pretty safe bets, and some long shots. Knowing that long shots rarely pay off does not discourage them. They might only need one big win to have a great year. If that means they are going to end up investing in some losers, well, that is the cost of doing business. That is what risk is.

Our venture philanthropist thinks the same way. She wants that one long shot that is going to pay off, that one great idea that is going to change the Jewish world. She is probably going to end up backing some losers in order to find that winner. That is the cost of doing venture philanthropy.

I attended a meeting of foundation professionals several years ago and the topic of discussion was “grants that failed.” As we went around the room describing our setbacks, one young pro, new to the field, delighted in asserting that he had a perfect track record — no failures. The moderator cautioned him not to be too proud of that record. In a foundation the size of the one at which he was working, no failures probably meant too low of a tolerance for risk. A good philanthropist ought to tolerate failure, at worst, and celebrate and learn from it, at best.

The are other characteristics of the venture philanthropist as well — a willingness to bring more than a checkbook to the table, for one; an insistence on measurables, for another. Venture philanthropy has its applications and misapplications. It is an approach that naturally favors certain not-for-profits and has limited application to others.

But one thing is certain: It is not just about getting a group of young people together to make small or mid-sized grants to a range of local institutions. It does not become venture philanthropy simply by calling it venture philanthropy.

If we want to change the world, or our little piece of it, we are going to have to take some chances. Aspiring venture philanthropists who are assessing their appetite for risk would do well to consider the New York Lottery’s sage advice to skeptical ticket-buyers: “Hey, you never know.”

Mark Charendoff is president of the Jewish Funders Network.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • A grumpy Jewish grandfather is wary of his granddaughter's celebrating Easter with the in-laws. But the Seesaw says it might just make her appreciate Judaism more. What do you think?
  • “Twist and Shout.” “Under the Boardwalk.” “Brown-Eyed Girl.” What do these great songs have in common? A forgotten Jewish songwriter. We tracked him down.
  • What can we learn from tragedies like the rampage in suburban Kansas City? For one thing, we must keep our eyes on the real threats that we as Jews face.
  • When is a legume not necessarily a legume? Philologos has the answer.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.