The Return of the Deficit


By Gus Tyler

Published August 01, 2003, issue of August 01, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The federal budget deficit for fiscal 2003 will be the largest in American history, according to the White House. The estimate is that the deficit will run to $455 billion for the year. It breaks all records by billions. The highest deficit up until this year was $290 billion in 1992 when George Bush Sr. was president.

In between the two Bushes, during the Clinton years, the deficit fell from $290 billion to $22 billion in 1997 and then turned into a surplus of $236 billion in the year 2000.

Under Bush Jr. deficits made their return. Just a half a year ago, the White House announced that the budget would be running a sizable deficit of $300 billion. In this brief period, the forecast is a deficit that will have risen by 50%.

This runaway budget deficit should be a source of considerable concern to the administration. But it isn’t. Serenely, the new director of the budget, Joshua Bolten, assures us that a deficit of such unprecedented magnitude is “manageable if we continue pro-growth economic policies and exercise serious spending disciplines.” To the informed who know that Iraq is costing Uncle Sam nearly $4 billion a month and who see the unemployment rate and business bankruptcies soaring, Bolton’s words sound like a nonchalant non sequitur.

What is not revealed in all this talk about budget deficits is that for years budget deficits have been distorted to fool the public into believing that the federal budget was in better condition than it really was. It started with President Lyndon Johnson. In his last years in office, Johnson was burdened with costly wars in Asia. To pay for them, he should have raised taxes. But since there was an election coming up, Johnson was hesitant to do so. Instead, he indulged in creative accounting.

He knew that the Social Security Trust Fund had been running surpluses for many years. So, he decided to merge the pluses of the Social Security Trust Fund with the minuses of the U.S. Treasury — although the Trust Fund was, and is, an independent entity whose surpluses, by law, must be invested in government securities. (Uncle Sam has been paying interest on those funds to the Social Security Trust Fund that now has assets of close to a trillion dollars.)

Johnson’s little ploy has, ever since, been formalized in the annual report of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. In that report there are three different budgets: the “On-Budget” budget, the “Off-Budget” budget and the unified budget.

No president has offered to put an end to this false reporting that counts borrowed money as “income” because this deception makes the budget look better than it is. During the last few years, the Social Security Trust Fund and a few other quasi-governmental funds such as the United States Postal Service and the Highway Trust Fund have jointly been running surpluses of about $150 billion a year. As a result, true government deficits have been and still are understated.

But shortly, these “off-budget” operations, especially the dominant Social Security Trust Fund, will become a burden rather than a blessing. The post-World War II baby boom generation is coming of age, getting ready to retire. The drain on the Social Security Trust Fund will in time exhaust the reserves, and a big plus may turn into a burdensome minus — as the painful truth about the budget is finally revealed.

Find us on Facebook!
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • What do you think?
  • "To everyone who is reading this article and saying, “Yes, but… Hamas,” I would ask you to just stop with the “buts.” Take a single moment and allow yourself to feel this tremendous loss. Lay down your arms and grieve for the children of Gaza."
  • Professor Dan Markel, 41 years old, was found shot and killed in his Tallahassee home on Friday. Jay Michaelson can't explain the death, just grieve for it.
  • Employees complained that the food they received to end the daily fast during the holy month of Ramadan was not enough (no non-kosher food is allowed in the plant). The next day, they were dismissed.
  • Why are peace activists getting beat up in Tel Aviv?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.