Charles Liebman Shed Light on Jewish Culture

Social Scientist Pioneered Pivotal Studies of Contemporary Jewry

By Steven M. Cohen

Published September 12, 2003, issue of September 12, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Charles Liebman, widely regarded as the pre-eminent social scientist of Jews and Judaism in the latter third of the 20th century, died last week in Petah Tikva at age 69. A political scientist by discipline, his dozen books and scores of scholarly articles deftly interpret the culture of Judaism and the Jewish people in the United States, Israel and around the world. Earlier this year he received the Israel Prize for his life’s work, awarded to Israeli political scientists only once every three years. He was also a recipient of the Marshall Sklare Award of the Association for the Social Scientific Study of Jewry as well as several other prestigious awards.

Known for his incisiveness, honesty and imagination, Liebman pioneered several influential and pivotal concepts in the study of contemporary Jewry. In “The Ambivalent American Jew,” published in 1972, he persuasively argued that American Jews struggle to integrate into the larger society while trying to maintain a distinctive group identity. Reflecting his profound concern over modernity’s challenge to Jewish authenticity, Liebman doubted that American Jews were prepared to distance themselves sufficiently from a culture and society that were, in his view, inimical to Jewish tradition.

To those of us who knew him as a friend and colleague, Liebman will be remembered not only for his originality and insight but also for his fierce devotion to honesty, even at the risk of unpopularity. He believed as a matter of principle in telling audiences what they did not want to hear, and he often critically assessed his colleagues’ work, pulling no punches in public or private. Yet his warmth, wit, curiosity and passion for his fellow Jews won him extraordinary affection and admiration from students, colleagues and the international fraternity of social scientists of Jewish life.

Born in New York, Liebman was brought to Israel as a child and completed his high school studies at the prestigious Gymnasia Herzliya in Tel Aviv. Returning to the United States after graduation, he earned his bachelor’s degree at the University of Miami and his master’s and doctoral degrees in political science at the University of Illinois, where he met his wife Carol. The couple moved in 1969 to Israel, where he helped found the political science department at Bar-Ilan University.

Building upon the work of sociologist Marshall Sklare, a man he admired as his friend and teacher, Liebman is remembered for advancing the influential notion of “Jewish personalism,” elaborated in “Two Worlds of Judaism,” the study of Israeli and American Judaism upon which he and I collaborated in 1990. By personalism, he meant the tendency of American Jews to pick those parts of Judaism they find personally meaningful, rather than complying with external requirements of religious law, Zionist ideology or ethnic obligation.

Liebman believed that Judaism has an authentic, albeit always evolving, core that is continuous with the past — whether real or imagined — and is essential for the unity of Jews and Judaism in our own day. Troubled by what he saw as the rampant tendency of American Jews to radically innovate, Charles frequently argued that Judaism is not anything you make of it. In particular, he was troubled by the tendency of American Jews to conflate Judaism with political and cultural liberalism.

A religiously observant Jew, Liebman was deeply committed to Jewish ethnicity and peoplehood. He found the decline over the years in close ties among American Jews to be deeply troubling and once remarked to me that this may be the most telling finding in the study of American Jewry. He was deeply pained at the rise in intermarriage, and even more pained by the readiness of organized American Jewry to soften its historic opposition to intermarriage. He feared that attempts to make Judaism attractive to intermarried families would make American Judaism less ethnic and less distinctive.

Notwithstanding his personal identification with cultural conservatism in the American context, Liebman counted himself as a religious dove with respect to the Israeli-Arab conflict. He often opposed Israeli government policies for reasons of both pragmatism and morality. He severely doubted whether Israel had the moral right to curtail the human rights of Palestinians, even in the interest of Israeli security.

To me personally, he was a caring and protective friend and, not least, a loving mentor. His personality shaped my work as strongly as his thinking and teaching.

A prolific scholar, he remained academically productive until his dying day and was preparing a new book with his younger friend and colleague Yaacov Yadgar, comparing approaches to Jewish traditionalism among Sephardic and Ashkenazic Israelis.

Charles spent most of his academic career teaching at Bar-Ilan University. In addition to his wife he is survived by three children, Rivkah Lubitch, Aaron Liebman and Avigayil Liebman, as well as six grandchildren.

For his service in the Israeli army, he served in the education branch and was fond of saying, “When war breaks out, others will start fighting, and I’ll give speeches.”

Steven M. Cohen is a professor at the Hebrew University and director of the Florence G. Heller/JCCA Research Center.






Find us on Facebook!
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • "My husband has been offered a terrific new job in a decent-sized Midwestern city. This is mostly great, except for the fact that we will have to leave our beloved NYC, where one can feel Jewish without trying very hard. He is half-Jewish and was raised with a fair amount of Judaism and respect for our tradition though ultimately he doesn’t feel Jewish in that Larry David sort of way like I do. So, he thinks I am nuts for hesitating to move to this new essentially Jew-less city. Oh, did I mention I am pregnant? Seesaw, this concern of mine is real, right? There is something to being surrounded by Jews, no? What should we do?"
  • "Orwell described the cliches of politics as 'packets of aspirin ready at the elbow.' Israel's 'right to defense' is a harder narcotic."
  • From Gene Simmons to Pink — Meet the Jews who rock:
  • The images, which have since been deleted, were captioned: “Israel is the last frontier of the free world."
  • As J Street backs Israel's operation in Gaza, does it risk losing grassroots support?
  • What Thomas Aquinas might say about #Hamas' tunnels:
  • The Jewish bachelorette has spoken.
  • "When it comes to Brenda Turtle, I ask you: What do you expect of a woman repressed all her life who suddenly finds herself free to explore? We can sit and pass judgment, especially when many of us just simply “got over” own sexual repression. But we are obliged to at least acknowledge that this problem is very, very real, and that complete gender segregation breeds sexual repression and unhealthy attitudes toward female sexuality."
  • "Everybody is proud of the resistance. No matter how many people, including myself, disapprove of or even hate Hamas and its ideology, every single person in Gaza is proud of the resistance." Part 2 of Walid Abuzaid's on-the-ground account of life in #Gaza:
  • After years in storage, Toronto’s iconic red-and-white "Sam the Record Man" sign, complete with spinning discs, will return to public view near its original downtown perch. The sign came to symbolize one of Canada’s most storied and successful Jewish family businesses.
  • Is $4,000 too much to ask for a non-member to be buried in a synagogue cemetery?
  • "Let’s not fall into the simplistic us/them dichotomy of 'we were just minding our business when they started firing rockets at us.' We were not just minding our business. We were building settlements, manning checkpoints, and filling jails." What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.