Jerusalem Weighs Danger Of an Unchecked N. Korea

By Ze’ev Schiff

Published January 17, 2003, issue of January 17, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

JERUSALEM — About 10 years ago the deputy chief of Israel’s Mossad, Ephraim Halevy, and a top-level Foreign Ministry official, Eitan Bentsur, were invited separately to meet with North Korean leaders and discuss Pyongyang’s missile supplies to various countries in the Middle East. The North Koreans made it clear they expected a significant Israeli financial response in return for agreements to curb such sales. The two Israelis traveled separately to Washington to get American views on the issue.

Each came back with different conclusions and recommendations. Halevy understood Washington was opposed to the North Korean offer, and that it would be best not to get under the Americans’ feet in a place where Washington has critical interests tied to its military presence in South Korea. Bentsur said Israel should not reject the North Korean offer.

Then-prime minister Yitzhak Rabin decided to accept Halevy’s view after the Americans promised they would deal through their own contacts with the matter of Middle East missile exports. Their view was to tackle the nuclear problem first and then the missile problem, and so the North Korean portfolio became an American responsibility.

In 1994, the United States and North Korea reached an agreement, now breached, by which North Korea promised to freeze its nuclear development program. But the missile problem only intensified.

Israel has not always followed the course it did a decade ago. When it became evident that Iran was trying to acquire ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel, and was pushing ahead with a military nuclear plan with the help of the Russians and Chinese, Israel adopted its own line. It coordinated its moves with Washington, but also acted, and continues to act, on its own vis-a-vis Russia regarding nuclear leakage to Iran, and the same with China. In this case, Israel’s separate path was clearer, despite the coordination with Washington.

It asked the leaders in Beijing not to endanger it with Middle Eastern weapons deals and even received promises. Sometimes this angered the Americans, who accused Israel of endangering regional stability, as in the case of the Phalcon aircraft sale to China.

The circumstances of 1992, when Israel was in contact with North Korea, are different from the circumstances today. The crisis with North Korea is being conducted against the background of an expected American attack on Iraq. Even though it is clear that North Korea is on the way to acquiring nuclear weapons, the United States is offering a peaceful solution and increased economic aid.

The new administration in South Korea is offering a tempting negotiation for a new economic-security deal to calm North Korea. Israel cannot ignore the fact that during the last decade, North Korea has exposed it to dangers in the Middle East by its ties to the missile programs of Syria, Iran, Libya and Yemen.

The missile shipment which was intercepted late last year off of Yemen was apparently on its way to Iraq. Egypt has also signed a purchase order for 50 engines for long-range No Dong missiles, but the deal was nixed by the United States.

If the current crisis over the North Korean missile program is not settled, there is a danger that Pyongyang will sell not just missile technology but nuclear technology to the Middle East. It’s a country that easily goes to the brink and is ready to take major risks in seeking a new anti-American coalition with countries like Iran, Libya, Syria and Yemen. This is a coalition that by definition will be extremely anti-Israeli.

Thus, North Korea’s moves in the Middle East pose dangers for Israel, which will only worsen if the crisis deepens. The coordination with Washington is therefore of great importance, and one should not conclude that Israel will be a silent player that waits for everything to be done for it by Washington. Israel has good reasons of its own for making direct contact with North Korea, just as it did with China and Russia.

This story is reprinted with permission from Ha’aretz, whose Web site is www.haaretzdaily.com.






Find us on Facebook!
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.