The Shooting
After 48 hours of nationwide hilarity, discussion of Dick Cheney’s hunting accident turned suddenly somber on Tuesday afternoon. That’s when America learned that the man Cheney shot, Texas attorney Harry Whittington, had suffered a heart attack. A pellet from the vice president’s shotgun had lodged in the lawyer’s heart. At that moment, Americans were forced to consider the possibility that when the vice president of the United States shoots a man in the face, the event could have a serious aspect.
That thought bears repeating: When the vice president of the United States shoots a man in the face, the event could have a serious aspect.
In a way, it’s not hard to understand why it took us so long to sober up. When the shooting first occurred, the vice president’s entourage didn’t even think it merited public notice. Once the news was finally reported by Cheney’s host, Republican lobbyist Katharine Armstrong, it was presented as a minor boo-boo. During a quail hunt, she said, Whittington showed up unexpectedly in Cheney’s line of fire and “got pretty well peppered.”
Now we have a new fault line in America’s culture wars. In the red states, “peppering” is a hunting hazard. In the blue states, it’s a culinary option. It was comic Jon Stewart who first captured blue-state America’s bewilderment at the dismissive tone: “Peppered. There you have it. Harry Whittington, seasoned to within an inch of his life.”
Red-state America responded with its own bewilderment. “You all can spend your time on it,” presidential spokesman Scott McClellan testily told reporters. “We’re going to keep focusing on the pressing priorities of the American people.”
But for most of us, our leaders’ behavior is a priority. The last time a vice president shot a citizen was in 1804, when former Treasury secretary Alexander Hamilton got “pretty well peppered” by Aaron Burr. Hamilton died the next day. We’ve been talking about that ever since.
Not too long ago, Republicans brought Washington to a standstill over a president’s sexual trysts. That president ended up facing impeachment because he waffled to a grand jury, suggesting that what he did depended on “what your definition of ‘is’ is.”
So, what’s your definition of “shot a man in the face”?
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
