Recipe for Disunion

Published January 31, 2003, issue of January 31, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Great presidents, it’s said, are in large measure products of circumstance. It’s at moments of national crisis that a leader has the opportunity to rise above his narrow base, put aside his own past baggage and rally a united citizenry. Only in crisis can a president be transformed into something larger than the sum of his parts.

Of course, not every president rises to the occasion. As President Bush showed in his State of the Union address this week, it’s possible for a president to stand before the nation in a moment of profound crisis and be revealed as nothing more than the limited individual we saw the day before.

America is facing a crisis of global proportions, as Bush rightly reminded us in his speech. It is a challenge to America’s values and its standing on the world stage, and it is a challenge we did not seek. A war has been declared on us by an international force of utter ruthlessness, and we must respond as a nation. Bush is not wrong in that.

He may be right, too, that the rise of dictatorships that pursue weapons of mass destruction compounds the terrorist challenge. The case for pre-emptive war has not yet been made convincingly, but Americans — and the world — are willing to be convinced.

The president’s next step, then, should have been to rally America and the world around the common cause of confronting the danger. If we are to go to war, Americans must face the enemy united, both among ourselves and with our fellow democracies across the sea. We must be clear about the reasons for war and the justice of our cause. We must understand the sacrifices that will be demanded. In all this, it is our president who must lead and unify us.

Bush, sadly, chose not to lead but to divide. In a calculated display of shocking partisanship, Bush combined his call to war against Iraq with a reiteration of his now familiar laundry list of radically conservative domestic schemes, from his $670 billion tax giveaway to the rich to his “faith-based” plan for funding churches and a new scheme for undermining Medicare by forcing patients into private HMOs — while declaring every American’s right “to choose their own doctor.”

Every one of these schemes is guaranteed to touch off an ugly, protracted battle in Congress and the media. Americans will be fighting Americans, when we should be fighting Al Qaeda and its allies.

The president should not have gone this route. In order to help Americans unite, he should have offered to modify his tax-cut plan and announced immediate, round-the-clock negotiations with Democrats — who represent fully half the electorate and control nearly half the Congress — to find a plan that meets them half-way. He should have announced that in deference to the misgivings of constitutional scholars and religious minorities, he was pulling back his faith-based initiative for further study, and appointing a bipartisan, interreligious panel of experts with a mandate to review the issue.

The last president who led a divided nation into war while insisting on a radical reordering of domestic priorities was Lyndon Johnson. In his 1966 State of the Union address Johnson, like Bush this week, struck dual themes of rallying Americans to war abroad and launching an ambitious economic restructuring at home. Unlike Bush, Johnson had just been elected in a historic landslide.

And yet the results were disastrous. Within two years Johnson was retiring from politics in humiliation, while his party was preparing to cede power to the opposition for what would become a generation of steadily rising Republican hegemony. As for that war, the nation never did rally. The war dragged on for nearly a decade, tens of thousands of American lives were lost and the enemy beat us.

Bush doesn’t need that kind of tsores. Neither does America.






Find us on Facebook!
  • “I don’t want to say, ‘Oh oh, I’m not Jewish,’ because when you say that, you sound like someone trying to get into a 1950s country club, “and I love the idea of being Jewish." Are you a fan of Seth Meyers?
  • "If you want my advice: more Palestinians, more checkpoints, just more reality." What do you think?
  • Happy birthday Barbra Streisand! Our favorite Funny Girl turns 72 today.
  • Clueless parenting advice from the star of "Clueless."
  • Why won't the city give an answer?
  • BREAKING NEWS: Israel has officially suspended peace talks with the Palestinians.
  • Can you guess what the most boring job in the army is?
  • What the foolish rabbi of Chelm teaches us about Israel and the Palestinian unity deal:
  • Mazel tov to Idina Menzel on making Variety "Power of Women" cover! http://jd.fo/f3Mms
  • "How much should I expect him and/or ask him to participate? Is it enough to have one parent reciting the prayers and observing the holidays?" What do you think?
  • New York and Montreal have been at odds for far too long. Stop the bagel wars, sign our bagel peace treaty!
  • Really, can you blame them?
  • “How I Stopped Hating Women of the Wall and Started Talking to My Mother.” Will you see it?
  • Taglit-Birthright Israel is redefining who they consider "Jewish" after a 17% drop in registration from 2011-2013. Is the "propaganda tag" keeping young people away?
  • Happy birthday William Shakespeare! Turns out, the Bard knew quite a bit about Jews.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.