Experts Say Saddam Interview Showed Iraqi’s New Eloquence

By Ori Nir

Published March 07, 2003, issue of March 07, 2003.
  • Print
  • Share Share

WASHINGTON — Given Saddam Hussein’s penchant for rambling in interviews and tendency to appear dazzled by the luster of his own flowery Arabic, longtime observers of the Iraqi dictator have come to not expect much in the way of eloquence from him.

That is why they were so surprised and impressed with Saddam’s sit-down last week with CBS anchorman Dan Rather. In his interview with Rather for “60 Minutes II,” Hussein switched linguistic gears: His answers were relatively short, and his language was formal and accurate.

“He was much more coherent and much more detailed this time than any other time he appeared in public,” said Majid Fakhry, emeritus professor of philosophy at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. “It was a person who not only has a good command of the language, but was more articulate than in the past, expansive and composed.”

A top Israeli intelligence expert echoed this assessment, with a clear explanation: “This time I think we saw a leader that was trying to survive, not to impress.”

“Saddam is usually inarticulate. You can translate the words he says, but you’ll still be stuck trying to understand the sentence structure and the thought structure,” said the intelligence expert, one of the longest-serving and most respected Arabic specialists in Israel’s security services. “I view his style as kitsch. It’s as if he’s trying to impress you with polished language and figurative expressions.”

This time, however, Saddam attempted to deliver a distilled message, and he was surprisingly nimble while fending off Rather’s queries.

When the veteran newsman attempted to get Saddam to compare his popularity in the Arab street with that of Osama bin Laden, the Iraqi leader dodged, saying that Rather surely is not the kind of interviewer who would try to “merely provoke or to try to get someone to say something that might be held against him.” And when he was asked to explain his idea of holding a televised debate with President Bush, Saddam replied that “the most important thing is that our debate be heard in a normal and accurate way.”

To the uninitiated, such observations might sound like trivial academic nit-picking. But, during the past half century, the hearts and history of the Middle East have often been swayed by the men most capable of simultaneously mastering the “high” Arabic of official speech and of written texts — almost identical to the classical language of the Koran — and the colloquial, spoken Arabic used by commoners.

The untold king of this near-impossible gambit — and Saddam’s rhetorical role model — was Gamal Abdel Nasser, the pan-Arab nationalist who ruled Egypt in the 1950s and 1960s. Nasser was “the leader that Saddam has been most impressed with, who shaped his outlook, and had a formative impact on him,” said Ibrahim Karawan, who directs the Middle East Center at the University of Utah.

Nasser’s secret was his ability to address both intellectuals — the Egyptian and Arab elite — and the largely illiterate working class of Egypt.

Karawan credited his former boss at the Cairo-based Al-Ashram Center for Strategic Studies, legendary speechwriter Muhammad Hassanen Haikal, for inserting the highbrow riffs into Nasser’s speeches. But the highlights of these speeches came when Nasser departed from the carefully crafted text and addressed the masses in colloquial Arabic.

Arabs all over the Middle East would gather around radio receivers and revel in Nasser’s scolding of Arab monarchs — he once declared that the boot of an Egyptian soldier is “worth more than the crown of [Jordanian King] Hussein or the throne of Saud” — or his ridiculing of Western leaders.

It was Nasser who invited superpower leaders, during the 1956 Suez crisis, to “drink from the Red Sea” — a phrase Yasser Arafat regularly borrows when urging opponents of a Palestinian state to go “drink from the sea of Gaza” or from the Dead Sea.

“But Saddam is no Nasser,” Karawan said.

The Iraqi leader lacks Nasser’s natural charisma, sophistication and credibility. “Inflaming the sentiments of the masses can work when the masses trust you,” Karawan said. “It cannot work when the masses are the ones that are going to pay the high price for your conduct.”

Experts agree that the most refined speaker among Arab leaders was the late King Hussein of Jordan, who combined a flawless command of the language with impeccable diction and personal charm. Egypt’s Anwar Sadat was considered an excellent speaker. Syria’s Hafez al-Assad may not have had the charisma of the Jordanian king or the Egyptian president, but his Arabic was grammatically flawless, accurate and elegant.

Current Arab leaders, however, leave much to be desired. Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak speaks an instrumental yet unattractive mixture of colloquial and classical Arabic, the rhetorical skills of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad are as pale as his personality and Jordan’s King Abdullah is still trying to shrug off his English accent. Having been educated in Britain, Abdullah speaks English better than he does Arabic. When he was hastily appointed to the throne, he took extensive tutoring to be able to speak in public without spoiling his father’s legacy.

Libya’s Muammar Gadhafi, with his staccato machine-gun-like diatribes and strong North African accent, is often incomprehensible to Arab visitors from outside his country.

Some say Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat intentionally adopts what is generally thought to be the roughest and crudest oratory style of contemporary Arab leaders — though, even in the eyes of his own people, it seems to be losing whatever mischievous, popular appeal it may have had. “His Arabic reflects his confused personality,” said Shukri Abed, chair of the languages department of the Middle East Institute, a Washington think tank.

So who are today’s great orators of the Arab world? Echoing several other observers, Abed told the Forward that he is particularly impressed with Osama bin Laden’s command of classical Arabic — “amazing, absolutely impeccable.” Abed also praised the linguistic skills of Sudanese President Omar Hassan al Bashir and Hezbollah’s secretary general, Hassan Nasrallah.

“There is no question that, with all of them, their excellent Arabic is a result of a good Muslim education,” Abed said.

Saddam, a secular dictator, never received a thorough religious education. His increased use of Muslim terminology and imagery only dates back to 1991, in the days following the Gulf War. It was then that he added the words “God is the Greatest” to the Iraqi national flag.

Find us on Facebook!
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • "My husband has been offered a terrific new job in a decent-sized Midwestern city. This is mostly great, except for the fact that we will have to leave our beloved NYC, where one can feel Jewish without trying very hard. He is half-Jewish and was raised with a fair amount of Judaism and respect for our tradition though ultimately he doesn’t feel Jewish in that Larry David sort of way like I do. So, he thinks I am nuts for hesitating to move to this new essentially Jew-less city. Oh, did I mention I am pregnant? Seesaw, this concern of mine is real, right? There is something to being surrounded by Jews, no? What should we do?"
  • "Orwell described the cliches of politics as 'packets of aspirin ready at the elbow.' Israel's 'right to defense' is a harder narcotic."
  • From Gene Simmons to Pink — Meet the Jews who rock:
  • The images, which have since been deleted, were captioned: “Israel is the last frontier of the free world."
  • As J Street backs Israel's operation in Gaza, does it risk losing grassroots support?
  • What Thomas Aquinas might say about #Hamas' tunnels:
  • The Jewish bachelorette has spoken.
  • "When it comes to Brenda Turtle, I ask you: What do you expect of a woman repressed all her life who suddenly finds herself free to explore? We can sit and pass judgment, especially when many of us just simply “got over” own sexual repression. But we are obliged to at least acknowledge that this problem is very, very real, and that complete gender segregation breeds sexual repression and unhealthy attitudes toward female sexuality."
  • "Everybody is proud of the resistance. No matter how many people, including myself, disapprove of or even hate Hamas and its ideology, every single person in Gaza is proud of the resistance." Part 2 of Walid Abuzaid's on-the-ground account of life in #Gaza:
  • After years in storage, Toronto’s iconic red-and-white "Sam the Record Man" sign, complete with spinning discs, will return to public view near its original downtown perch. The sign came to symbolize one of Canada’s most storied and successful Jewish family businesses.
  • Is $4,000 too much to ask for a non-member to be buried in a synagogue cemetery?
  • "Let’s not fall into the simplistic us/them dichotomy of 'we were just minding our business when they started firing rockets at us.' We were not just minding our business. We were building settlements, manning checkpoints, and filling jails." What do you think?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.